Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Surveillance bill gets Hill hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:41 AM
Original message
Surveillance bill gets Hill hearing
Source: USA Today

WASHINGTON — FBI agents and other federal investigators would have greater leeway to eavesdrop on foreigners in the USA suspected of having information on terrorism or national security threats, under a Bush administration proposal.

The bill has the backing of the Justice Department and Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell. It would allow the telephone calls, e-mails and other activities of persons who are not U.S. citizens or legal residents to be secretly monitored if they are thought to "possess significant foreign intelligence information." Individuals and groups who deal in "weapons of mass destruction" would also become surveillance targets, under the proposed law.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act requires that a surveillance target be an agent of a foreign power or connected to a terrorist group before a secret FISA court authorizes monitoring. The proposed law, a copy of which was furnished to USA TODAY by McConnell's office, would amend that requirement.

The Senate Intelligence Committee is scheduled to conduct hearings on the bill today.

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-04-16-FISA_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Congress should just drop it
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 08:50 AM by ck4829
They do not have to even bring it up for a hearing, so I say to Congress, just let this surveillance thing drop like a bag of bricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh, no -- it shouldn't be dropped. Further restrictions should be added.
Let Dubya veto an intelligence bill, too -- or accept further restrictions on snooping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. You don't let an administration that has run amok and run roughshod.........
Edited on Tue Apr-17-07 08:53 AM by Double T
over the Constitution and Bill of Rights and plain old human decency have unlimited powers without strict oversight. The Democrats in Congress better NOT let us down on this change in the law. bushco is ALL ABOUT skirting the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait a minute.... I thought Bush already had the authority to conduct surveillance of this nature
Isn't that what they kept telling us... that as commander-in-chief, he can wiretap these people w/o a warrant?


If he DOES... why does he need this bill?




If this bill is necessary, then what Bush was doing up until now is ILLEGAL... is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC