Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guatemala Rejects US Ethanol Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 02:07 PM
Original message
Guatemala Rejects US Ethanol Plan
Edited on Thu Apr-05-07 02:08 PM by Judi Lynn
Source: Prensa Latina



Guatemala Rejects US Ethanol Plan

Guatemala, Apr 5 (Prensa Latina) The US-promoted plan of using agricultural products to produce ethanol would bring a world food catastrophe, Guatemala's popular leaders and farmers stated on Thursday.

Orlando Blanco, leader of the Social Organizations Group (COS), told Prensa Latina that to use great quantity of corn and other cereals to extract a gallon of ethanol is really an offense to people who are starving.

"In the case of Guatemala," said Blanco, "this project would cause a devastating crisis because it would wipe out production of basic grains in a country where 50 percent of population live on agriculture."

He warned that since the Free Trade Agreement with United States came into force, there is a latent risk here on the idea of sowing transgenic corn, sugarcane and African palm to produce fuel.



Read more: ~~~~ link ~~~~



http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID=%7BA222C697-0E7E-439D-B67E-F28DD54670B6%7D)&language=EN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roadside Rampage: Salvadoran Murders in Guatemala Raise the Stake of Central American Drug-Addled Vi
Thursday, April 5th, 2007

Roadside Rampage: Salvadoran Murders in Guatemala Raise the Stake of Central American Drug-Addled Violence

In the aftermath of President Bush’s recent failed trip to Latin America, the diplomatic toll mounts:

• In closely scanning the newspapers in the region, not a single significant achievement was wracked up by the Bush trip

• Heads should roll among those in the Bush administration who planned the tour

• Of the five countries visited, only stopovers in Uruguay and Brazil could be even remotely defended as bringing some good news, while Guatemala and Colombia turned out to be total disasters, with Mexico generating a yawn.
(snip/...)

http://www.coha.org/2007/04/05/roadside-rampage-salvadoran-murders-in-guatemala-raise-the-stake-of-central-american-drug-addled-violence-2/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. One man's account of an anti-Bush demonstration in Guatemala City:
burning bush in guate city
from La Sur: Politics and Culture in Mexico and Central America
Trip Date: Mar 11 '07
Location: Guatemala City, Guatemala

“someone in the crowd discovered eggs and soon everyone was pelting the cops with them.”

~snip~
but the biggest surprise of movement was the rest of the crowd, the bulk of the protestors that did not groove on the violence. they left. i don't mean "the walked away in disgust from the violence." i mean several hundred people turned and literally ran, full speed, no looking back, out every side street available to them. i have never seen such a large mass of people move so quickly. what was perhaps a two thousand person strong protest transformed within seconds to a group of maybe 100 protestors, with perhaps another hundred watching safely from a more removed distance. my guess is that the cops here are reknowned for their violence, and with the memory of the civil war only a decade past, most people had no interest in getting their heads busted in.

what followed was about two hours of low-intensity violence, perpetrated by the protestors against the cops, with almost no reaction at all from the police line. as barricades were pulled down a new lines of human cops would go up in the same place, but no excursions were made to capture anyone. stun guns were brandished but not used. someone in the crowd discovered eggs and soon everyone was pelting the cops with them. others were pulling up cobblestones and breaking up chunks of sidewalk to throw at cops. mostly the police were impervious to this but i did see one cop take a fist side rock in the side of his face. more barricades were thrown, received, and pulled behind the cop line. the guys on the bullhorn had more level heads, and i heard numerous pleas in spanish to "please not incited the violence," and "there are women and children present, please do not incite the police."

jack-booted state
View more photos no-one throwing objects was older than 20 or 25 or so. a surprising number of them were as young as 12. all but one was male. most wore bandanas on their faces. all in all, they reminded me more than anything of the black block crowd in our own protests, only with less inhibitions against violence against persons. very very quickly the protest turned from "people versus bush," to "young punks versus the cops". personally i did not see the point to this shift, as the punks had completely alienated their own support base, and while the cops were not our friends, they were certainly not the main enemies here. not that that ever stops the black block in our own movements, of course.

surprising too was this smaller crowd's reaction to us, the gringo protestors. my friend "d", up on a lamp post, called down in her broken english for some eggs to throw. this was greeted by jeers from the crowd, who shouted slogans (in spanish) at us, like "spanish only!" and "gringos go home!" and "que? que? que? que?", an imitation of gringos who say "what?" all the time when trying to understand español. the next round of egg-throwing included us as targets, and direct hit to my shoulder luckily bounced off and did not break. other less-accurate shots just left me splattered. apparently this small group of punk-ass kids doesn't need any allies at all, not local, not international, and they by themselves are going to take on the cops, win, and change the social structure of their country. good for them. good luck.

still, there was one great highlight for me here. someone had the bright idea of creating a george w. bush piñata. they tied it to a string on the end of a stick, lit the toes on fire, and then dangled the smoldering contraption of the head of the cops. like cats with a shiny toy the cops could not help but bat at the thing with their batons, and for about 15 seconds i was laughing my ass off at the site of a half-dozen cops beating the crap out of the image of george w. bush. how totally ironic! apparently the irony was not lost of the cop commander either, and the second time it was dangled the troops on the line were ordered to leave it alone. when it dropped too low one of them finally captured it and took the protestor's toy away. bummer.
(snip/...)

http://realtravel.com/guatemala_city-journals-j3967370.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the PNAC's "final solution"
Let the brown people starve, which means more oil for their SUV's At this rate, it won't be long before the rest of the world declares we should no longer exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Viva Guatemala
There's seems to be so much sanity outside of the borders of the U.S. of A....

And so little within...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm glad to see resistance to the "ethanol colonization" of Latin America, but
this headline is a little misleading. Generally, the word "Guatemala" as a subject of the sentence would mean the government of Guatemala. I may not agree with that politically. I think that the PEOPLE of Guatemala ARE Guatemala. And, often, rightwing governments are at odds with the opinions and interests of their own people. So, "Guatemala," as a designation meaning its people is okay with me. To say "Guatemala rejects US Ethanol Plan" is true, politically. The Guatemalan people reject it. But the rightwing government does not reject it, as far as I know. The government is into "free trade" (global corporate piracy). The article title gave me the wrong impression, that the government was acting in the interests of the people and had shoved this one back in Bush's face--which I don't think has happened.

As a matter of fact, I think it will be quite important in the coming Guatemalan elections, that the left (the majority) rejects conversion of farmland to fuel land for US cars, and all US/Corporate plundering ("free trade"), while the rightwing rich elites--who currently control everything including the government--welcome the rape and ruin of their country, if it enriches them.

I'm not sure what is meant by "Guatemala's popular leaders and farmers" as to the ability of the people to influence THIS government. And I don't know if the "Social Organizations Group (COS)" has any official standing or ability to set policy. Perhaps I misunderstand who they are. But I'm pretty sure I'm right that this DOESN'T mean an official change of policy. It means, rather, that the rightwing government is going to have a big fight on its hands when it comes to this latest Oil Cartel plan--especially with half the people in the country living by agriculture--food production--no doubt on small farms, that Big Oil will try to get title to and aggregate into vast, pesticide-ridden, erosion-creating, chemically and GMO-polluted, ugly, goddamned, exploitative, earth-killing waste lands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Aw, I thought the same as you did
The headline lead me to believe Guatemalan leadership rejected ethanol plans and I was ready to say yay.

So it appears this is a wait and see situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC