Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice's new U.S. attorneys have partisan records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:13 PM
Original message
Justice's new U.S. attorneys have partisan records
Source: McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Under President Bush, the Justice Department has backed tougher state voter identification laws and steered U.S. attorneys toward investigating voter fraud -- policies that critics say have been intended to suppress Democratic votes.

Bush, Karl Rove, the president’s deputy chief of staff, and other Republican political advisers have highlighted voting rights issues and what Rove has called the “growing problem” of Democratic election fraud since Bush took power in the tumultuous election of 2000, a race ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Since 2005, McClatchy Newspapers has found, Bush has appointed at least three U.S. attorneys who had worked in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division when it was rolling back long-standing voting rights policies aimed at protecting predominantly poor, minority voters.

Another newly installed U.S. attorney, Tim Griffin in Little Rock, Ark., was accused of participating in efforts to suppress Democratic votes in Florida during the 2004 presidential election while he was research director for the Republican National Committee. He's denied any wrongdoing.

... Taken together, legal experts and other critics say, the replacement of the U.S. attorneys and the changes in Justice Department voting rights policies suggest that the Bush administration may have been using its law enforcement powers for partisan political purposes.


Read more: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16962753.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush administration may have been using its law enforcement powers for partisan political purposes
And the sun may rise tomorrow.

But who knows for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush administration may have been using its law enforcement powers for partisan political purposes.
Yup, that sums it up

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. recommend -- steraling elections remains a republick party corner stone for gaining power.
remember and never forget the goal is -- a permanent republick party majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. low lifes. It will takes years to fix this----if fixable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rove set up an incredible infrastructure, we are seeing just the tip of the iceberg.
We may never dismantle it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. ... in building a "permanent Republican majority" attributed to KKKarl
by none other than Tom DeLay.

Didn't Hitler build a "permanent majority" in the democratic beginnings of the Weimar Republic? A permanent majority for the Nazis -

Of course, Neocons don't study history, or serve in combat. They go to school to learn how to count beans, cook books and spin the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It is also the US corporate model. Destroy all opposition, bribe everyone else.
Corner the market, borrow as much money as possible.
Expand, then declare bankruptcy and walk away rich beyond dreams.
Everyone else is left holding the bag and cleaning up the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Democratic election fraud" Is this why we have won all the elections since 2000? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. i guess there can be no doubt about which u.s. attorneys
will be gone when a dem gets elected president. and i guess we can never let down our guard again.

the deceit and hubris of these guys just stuns me.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Actually, there is much confusion on this, even more than a week after all
this started to receive major media attention --It is NORMAL (at least for the last 20 years or so) for an INCOMING President to replace ALL of the US Attorneys at the beginning of his first term. (they are appointed for 4 year terms, but generally stay in place if a President is elected to (or steals) a 2nd term.) What is unusual here is that Chimpy replaced some in the *middle* of his term in office, and for POLITICAL reasons - politicization of the Judicial branch is NOT appropriate in a so-called Democracy. Presumably you know the rest, but, for those just getting up to speed here:

There is an ever-growing pile of evidence that US Attorneys were fired for either not going after Democratic corruption in a vigorous enough manner to keep the WH happy and/or for pursuing investigations of Republican corruption.

*****Methinks that it will be VERY important to investigate what sorts of inappropriate actions were taken by the US Attorneys who KEPT their jobs. There is bound to be MUCH slime unearthed here, deeds that were done to keep BushCo happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. yes, i know all that. i'm just saying that chimpy has
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 12:37 PM by ellenfl
apparently surreptitiously stacked the courts, over and above normal procedure, and the dem prez will have to try to undo some of the damage.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. MAY have been using its law enforcement powers for partisan political purposes ??
well, that is putting it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. MAY have been using its law enforcement powers for partisan political purposes ??
well, that is putting it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is SO chilling
It's so damn bald, so brazen, so unbelievably wrong -- and yet that doesn't bother them at all (as if I should be surprised at sociopathic behavior by this time).

There is just no end to the outrages from this administrtion. I sure as hell hope all our Dems investigating this see this particular article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. What a surprise
Delay's storm troopers in FL 2000 should have been met with baseball bats and small arms fire. This thing should have been brought to a head before it got to this point. What is the sense of having a right to bear arms if we are not going to use it to protect our franchise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. NOT in the NYT or WaPo I see
gawd our traditional media is so utterly and cravenly bought out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee, I wonder why they didn't want to have to have them confirmed?
Maybe because these partisan hacks -- if they're even licensed to practice law -- wouldn't even get out of committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC