Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(CNN) Iranian official offers glimpse from within: A desire for U.S. ally

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:08 PM
Original message
(CNN) Iranian official offers glimpse from within: A desire for U.S. ally

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/02/21/btsc.iran.amanpour/index.html

Iranian official offers glimpse from within: A desire for U.S. ally

• Senior official offers interpretation of religious leaders' view of United States
• Says cooperation, not conflict, is desire of key leaders, including Khamenei
• Wish for nuclear program is to show strength and independence, he says
• Not all in government agree with the view, unnamed official adds
By Christiane Amanpour
CNN

TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- As I sat down recently with a senior Iranian government official, he urgently waved a column by Thomas Friedman of The New York Times in my face, one about how the United States and Iran need to engage each other.

''Natural allies,'' this official said.

It was a surprising choice of words considering the barbs Washington and Tehran have been trading of late.

"We are not after conflict. We are not after crisis. We are not after war," said this official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "But we don't know whether the same is true in the U.S. or not. If the same is true on the U.S. side, the first step must be to end this vicious cycle that can lead to dangerous action -- war."

...

But he insisted he was describing the thinking at the highest levels of the religious leadership -- the center of decision-making power in Iran.

I asked whether he meant Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei himself.

"Yes," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Amanpour is an authentic journalist.
Glad she is fighting to get the truth out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. remember this? "Did Bush wiretap CNN's Christiane Amanpour? "

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/01/did-bush-wiretap-cnns-christiane.html

Did Bush wiretap CNN's Christiane Amanpour?
by John in DC · 1/04/2006 02:09:00 PM ET
Discuss this post here: Comments (121) · digg it · reddit · FARK · · Link

FURTHER UPDATE: NBC has now deleted the paragraphs of the interview dealing with Amanpour. Very very interesting.

UPDATE: Read our follow-on to this story here.

From NBC News:

New York Times reporter James Risen first broke the story two weeks ago that the National Security Agency began spying on domestic communications soon after 9/11. In a new book out Tuesday, "State of War," he says it was a lot bigger than that. Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea Mitchell sat down with Risen to talk about the NSA, and the run-up to the war in Iraq....

Mitchell: Do you have any information about reporters being swept up in this net?

Risen: No, I don't. It's not clear to me. That's one of the questions we'll have to look into the future. Were there abuses of this program or not? I don't know the answer to that

Mitchell: You don't have any information, for instance, that a very prominent journalist, Christiane Amanpour, might have been eavesdropped upon?

Risen: No, no I hadn't heard that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a major diplomatic outreach.
Make no mistake about that. This is how these sorts of things are done when there are no other lines of communication.

If the maladministration does not pick up on this and run with it, Congress must step in.

As an aside: There may be factionalism conflicts going on in Iran right now. One faction, in control of certain military elements and wanting to take the reins of power, may be roiling the waters. Other, more moderate factions may be trying to stay their precipitous behavior.

All in all, the US needs to engage Iran diplomatically and at the soonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4.  I agree
Perhaps congress could at least threaten to do something if Bush doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is nonsense
The mullahs will ally with none but there own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankieT Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why ?
Are you some kind of mullahs expert ? Please, I want to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why? bc it's Feb. 22nd
remember the deadline? You only have to follow the UN current events to see this "move" is going in the right direction.
In the long run, I would prefer to be allies with Iran and use that alliance with discussing internal wahibi matters with the House of Saud.

At least in certain sections of Tehran,women have a certain level freedom of expression that Saudi women only dream about.

Thats the direction this WOT needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankieT Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I totally agree with you
I was questioning the widespread view that Iran leaders are 100% extremist religious lunatics. Iran is an old country and even if iranian leaders don't satisfy our superior western standards they inherited a long tradition of subtle diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. * is too stupid to realize this is a "Nixon goes to China" moment.
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 07:03 PM by roamer65
If he went to Iran and talked, he actually would begin to have a "legacy". But it isn't gonna happen. Like Chavez said, "He's a monkey with a razorblade".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Actually, it's more of a Kissinger shuttle diplomacy door opening
The media was the tool used between Sadat and the prime minister of Israel when they were each quoted as as saying in public they were willing to meet face to face and discuss peace.
Both on public record.

..the ball is in the DC beltway court now. See if there is a return volley.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC