|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:05 AM Original message |
NYT: Exxon Chief Cautions Against Rapid Action to Cut Carbon Emissions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. Shut up you warmongering, terrorist supporting, propaganda spewing, profiteering SOB. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. You forgot GANSTERS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, it may cut into the year end bonuses and the management |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. I expected nothing less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doondoo (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well dayum, if EXXON is against it then we should be TOO!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. In my best Gomer Pyle voice.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eugene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
6. Tillerson: We admit there might be a problem, but is it really THAT urgent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. Gentlemen! We have to protect our phoney-baloney jobs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I didn't get a "harrumph" from that guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankeyMCC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I nominate this post as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
all.of.me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broadslidin (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
10. The Only Place For The government steno pool n.y.t. is The Dust Bin....!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blitzen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. Hah! He's worried about "future generations"! Yeah, right.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
12. The fact that they're admitting there's a connection between CO2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. I wonder, what they think the economic consequences will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. they're betting they'll all be dead by then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. I know the answer to that. Since exxon MUST continue to reap huge profits, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
14. At first, they said it didn't exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selteri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
15. These people don't seem to get it that all the profit in the world doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
16. yeah, oil companies give great advice on environmental protection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
17. What will the world economy look like without crops, with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozymandius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
18. The whore wears Armani. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
20. Put a sock in it, Tillerson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
21. Um, define "haste," Tillerson. You and your cronies have been instrumental... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. They still haven't paid off their bills for destroying the coast of Alaska! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
24. Shut up you profit-mongering piece of shit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. You need a world to have a world economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. Yes, in downtown Houston in future decades, they may swim to the surface ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seldona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. Don't mess with their $75k per MINUTE profits? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
28. maybe we just need to nationalize exxon, and change some priorities here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
29. ::headdesk:: x9000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
31. Right. Let's not be hasty. Wouldn't be prudent. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wovenpaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-14-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. Money must trump global warming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YankeyMCC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
33. "When all the trees have been cut down, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
34. ruin global economy, right, check. more like ruin your record profits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
36. If you don't like Exxon, then don't buy their oil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
37. $270 plus billion in profits last quarter? STFU.....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. Okay, they can foot the bill for the effects of global warming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-15-07 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
39. Exxon is NOT the world economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC