Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Court turns down Iran opposition group (terror indictment appeal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:49 AM
Original message
AP: Court turns down Iran opposition group (terror indictment appeal)
Monday, January 8, 2007 · Last updated 7:07 a.m. PT

Court turns down Iran opposition group

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- Supporters of an Iranian opposition group lost a Supreme Court
appeal Monday that was intended to let them challenge the United States'
designation of the group as a foreign terrorist organization.

Justices declined to review the case of seven people who were indicted in 2001
on charges they raised money for the People's Mujahedeen, also known as the MEK.
The State Department first said in 1997 that the group engaged in terrorist
activities.

In 2002, 150 members of Congress called on the State Department to withdraw the
designation.

The seven people have sought to dismiss the charges against them by demonstrating
that the Iranian group has no terrorism ties. The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
said the indictment could proceed.

-snip-

Full article: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1154AP_Scotus_Iranian_Opposition.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Here's a snip from the case on-going case ..... No. 06-241 note: FTO = "foreign terrorist organization"

"In 1999, the Secretary redesignated the MEK as an FTO. At that time, the Secretary added a new alias designation for the MEK, finding that the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) had been acting as the MEK's alter ego. The MEK and the NCRI challenged their 1999 designations. See National Council of Resistance of Iran v. Department of State, 251 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (NCRI I). The District of Columbia Circuit rejected the MEK's statutory challenges to the Secretary's action. Id. at 199-200. The court held, how ever, that the NCRI had a sufficient presence in the United States to trigger the protections of the United States Constitution, id. at 201-203, and that the organization had not been provided with adequate procedural safeguards in connection with the 1999 designation, id. at 208-209." -snip-

http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2006/0responses/2006-0241.resp.html

I add this here because if you type in NCRI into google 'news' ... you will find a very busy propaganda campaign active here in the U.S. by these people in trying to bring on an all out war with Iran. How this organization can be given 'constitutional protection' as a front for MEK ... is beyond me? ..... Twisted thinking somewhere in there. Anyway NCRI, MEK, MKO and a guy named Alireza Jafarzadeh (spokesman for this conglomeration of orgs) ..... will be saying a lot in the next few weeks, months etc... remember Chalabi in the run-up to the Iraqi mess? Well kinda the same program going on here as it relates to Iran. Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, what a tangled web of players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC