Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Intelligence Panel Staffer Reinstated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:05 PM
Original message
WP: Intelligence Panel Staffer Reinstated
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/20/AR2006112001140.html

A Democratic staff member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has had his security clearances reinstated and yesterday resumed work for the panel, ending a pre-election drama during which senior House Republicans alleged he may have leaked an intelligence report that was politically embarrassing to the Bush administration.

The mid-level staffer, Larry Hanauer, had signed an affidavit that he did not "discuss, disclose or cause to be discussed or disclosed" a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraq to any person "affiliated with the press."

Committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) wrote on Friday to ranking Democrat Jane Harman (Calif.) that the affidavit and the results of the committee staff director's interview of Hanauer were enough for him to rescind the punishment.

At the time of the suspension, Hoekstra told Harman that another committee member, Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.), had questioned the timing between Hanauer obtaining the NIE for a Democratic lawmaker who requested it and the New York Times publishing a story about it days later. Although the leak allegation was not based on any evidence, Hoekstra suspended Hanauer, telling Harman he had "come to the conclusion that I cannot assume that this was a mere coincidence."

Soon after the suspension last month, House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) released statements condemning leaks and praising Hoekstra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another election trick
that didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, it meant to intimidate and punish
Punish didn't work, but the intimidation factor is still there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like a Hoekstra is putting a down payment on some payback insurance.
Too little too late, asswipe. BEFORE the election this might have had some meaning. It has little meaning AFTER the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polesitter Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. If members and staffers had to pass polygraphs like CIA & NSA
personnel, you couldn't fill or staff the intel committees. Assigned military take only Counterintelligence (CI) Polys - civilian employees must pass full life-style in addition to CI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. "an intelligence report that was politically embarrassing to the Bush administration"
Gee, wouldn't that describe ALL of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC