Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark Says He Hasn't Ruled Out Clinton As Running Mate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:18 PM
Original message
Clark Says He Hasn't Ruled Out Clinton As Running Mate
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 01:21 PM by Jerseycoa
On the presidential campaign trail Tuesday morning, Democrat Wesley Clark said he has not ruled out Hillary Clinton as his running mate if he wins the Democratic presidential nomination.

Clark praised the New York senator as a great person and a great leader and said he has admired her for 20 years.


Source: AP



:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. hehe
the freepers are going to love that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. No matter the criticisms of Hillary
I love her positions on social policy...and it would be quite entertaining to see her debate Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Above donkey (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thx. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you spell D-E-S-P-A-R-A-T-E?
Man, and I like Clark too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Calm down
He was probably asked a question and answered it. He did not issue a press release. I thought it was amusing, I admit, but until we hear what was actually said, let's hold our fire. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Apparently you can't spell it.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Must be that oxycotin I had this morning...
...lol, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
64. That's spelled O-X-Y-C-O-N-T-I-N Patriot_Spear :)
I guess when you buy it directly from Rush, you don't have a prescription bottle to reference.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. what is this, a "spelling be?"
yeah, yeah, that was a joke. bee. whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #67
74. Hee Hee. Twas a good goke truthisfreedom. :)
End of massage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. *I* can, can you??? :) (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You Win the "Ironic Post of the Week" Award (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yes, I can spell desperate. Unfortunately,
you can't--and Clark isn't. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Uh, do you mean D-E-S-P-E-R-A-T-E?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. That was my immediate reaction.
Not having a good day, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. oops...lol
Oh, well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. Desperate? This Has Been A Topic For Months
I can recall seeing this (Hillary as potential VP) being debated on Clark blogs including the national Yahoo! Clark site since late summer, before Clark even announced. Personally, I think it would be a great winning ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saskatoon Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
53. Hilary in second spot?????
She would NEVER take 2nd place. She will be a President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nile Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #53
70. But...
Do not a lot more Vice Presidents go on to be President than do Senators? May it increase her chances down the road.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederic Bastiat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. Where did you learn how to spell like DubYa?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. I'm from Arkansas and I was a Rhodes scholar...
:evilgrin:

I must need a nap.

Scouts Out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Were you trying to spell desperate, or disparate?
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. I was in a hurry and made an ass of myself...
LOL... Irony was having way too much fun at my expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
55. Hahahaha
I've done that too, it kind of ruins your point. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pompitous_Of_Love Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
72. Yes, I can
D-E-S-P-E-R-A-T-E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Might be the case, but don't think he's ruled
out anyone else either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. So What If He "Hasn't Ruled Out " Asking Senator Clinton
that doesn't mean that she'd join the ticket if asked. She has clearly said again and again (no matter how badly the freepers long for her to be in the white house) she has a responsibility to fulfill as NY Senator.

The repukes need to just get the hell over their lust for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You talking to me, pal?
"freepers"? "repukes"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. I'm Saying The Repukes Want Her In The White House So They
can start their "Arkansas Project" up again and do their witch hunt craziness with congress, etc.

I believe most dems accept Senator Clinton's answer (which she has given a thousand times!) that she is going to fulfill her senatorial duties. I see this Clark "story" as some reporter trying to put words in his mouth about something that will never happen. All it does is feed the repuke wet dream fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
75. Mmmm....I think you're on the wrong track
This is just my opinion, but I think the repukes wouldn't mind seeing Hillary run because they don't think she has a snowball's chance of winning. (It scares them to the core to even imagine her winning...but they are convinced she is SO hated by a majority of Americans and that she SO polarizes the country, that she'll never win.)
Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. No Clark, don't do it!
I LIKE Wes, but I'm not a fan of Hillary. If he's going to win the nomination and pick her as his running mate, I might have to hold out my vote.

I'd gladly vote for Clark in the general election, so this isn't a dog on him. It's a dog on Hillary, someone that has sold out Democrats ONE too many times while she's be a 'rookie' senator from New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Don't worry, Sean
It ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Very smart to try to keep his name in the news today
there is no way he can overtake the amount of coverage that Dean is getting in this news cycle but he can be the "oh and Wesley Clark said today..." end of the coverage of the Dems.

Let everyone know he is still there
and that his eye is still on the prize of the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. SawHillary on an interview this weekend
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 01:56 PM by jokerman2004
sorry no link, and I wasn't paying attention until they got on the subject of the '04 campaign.

Her eyes sparkled, she batted her eyes a few times, and very carefully demured from making much of a statement at all. But she certainly wasn't attempting to dispell all doubt.

Who knows? With Gore's endorsement of Dean just breaking, maybe the senior Dems are positioning themselves on this election now. Clintons Vs. Gores vs. Rove...

I wouldn't rule out anything at this point.

(Although, I'd feel a little uncomfortable if Hillary baled on her first term Senatorial duties.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I didn't see the interview on MTP
but I read the transcript, and she said clearly she would not run or accept a draft in 2004. She won't bail on her promise to New Yorkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. Thanks for correcting my impressions
Like I say, I wasn't paying complete attention. Now we know how little attention I was paying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
76. I taped it and watched the segment with Hillary TWICE
and she did make it pretty clear that she wouldn't run NOR would she accept the nomination should it somehow be bestowed on her (which she adamantly insisted was NOT going to happen.) Still...she seemed flattered and a little coy, but her words made it pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Although I am sure that there's a core of truth here,
this is mostly to compete with Gore's endorsement of Dean, to deflect a bit of media attention to Clark's campaign. I doubt that Senator Clinton would accept, anyway.

Neither Clinton will endorse a candidate at this point, as they would want to put 100% of their weight and influence behind whoever emerges as the Democratic candidate. Their endorsement now would only muddy the waters; Gore's endorsement, however, gets full media attention without overshadowing the primary campaign, which is great!

Both Gore's endorsement of Dean and Clark's teasing the media are fantastic. I can't tell you how good it is to see something in the news that isn't Repug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hey2370 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Right on, my friend!
Any press is good for the Dems as it brings them attention they don't get from the media in general. Plus it gets them talking about the Dem Presidential candidates and that is great for the electorate to hear.

I'm not a fan of Clark or Hillary, but media time taken away from the GOP is good for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
77. Good points!
And I like the way you called it - Clark "teasing" the media. That's just what it is, and it's working!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Of course he wouldn't rule her out...
That still doesn't mean she'll accept. She's been very adamant about finishing her term as senator. I think this is Clark's way of invoking his connection to the Clintons for political advantage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. When Clinton obsessed reporters ask such question, what can one answer?
NO WAY, I HATE HER? This is a non-story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Exactly
if he's says no, it sounds like he's dissing her. He's not the one who raised the topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. This thing is very far from over
All it takes is one very likely Dean screw up and the nomination becomes a toss up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swittersnc Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. clark hasn't officially ruled me out either
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yeah really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. How many have there been so far?
I don't think anything is going to bring Dean down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hey2370 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. From what I have seen of Clark and Dean so far
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 02:34 PM by hey2370
A debilitating Clark screwup is far more likely than a debilitating Dean screwup.

Clark already said in a national TV spotlight program (Hardball) that he wasn't fired and didn't quit under Clinton. What the hell happened then? "It was politics", Clark said. Okay, then, you were fired or quit because of politics, right? I liked the guy before I saw that interview, but he came off as someone that wouldn't be a viable candidate if he wasn't a former four-star general.

ON EDIT: And now I have serious doubts as to whether Clark would even be a good VP choice. He exhibits poor political ability to the point where he would probably have trouble debating polished pol like Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BellTry Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. You are totally correct
Dean has a good amount of political experience. Clark has nothing in comparison. A rookie in politics is always far more likely to screw up compared to a veteran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Bah, humbug!
Boy, we came away from that interview with totally different views. What really happened is that they slipped a new guy in under the wire. It was a sneaky, run-around Clinton. When Clinton found out, he was furious, but felt helpless to correct because of his tenuous relationship with Shelton and Cohen, I believe both Republicans. They told Clark he was being relieved early for the new guy to get a headstart, so to speak. He was always battling with the Pentagon and they got even for his wins by sneaking him out of the picture a few months early, when it really didn't matter, since it was only three months until he would be relieved anyway. He received major kudos from everyone, including Shelton, who, at the time, had nothing but praise for our General Clark. This is really a non-story, for General Clark came out of Kosovo smelling like a rose, and everybody knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foswia Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. As if Dean could?
Clark could take on Bush, Hilary could take on Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. And Dean hasn't ruled Clark out either ;-)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. NEWSFLASH:Clark is going to be on the ticket one way or another
Aside from him the only "southern" still running is Edwards...okay Graham could be the VP pick and a good one but I would bet on Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. I don't think Clark would accept the second slot
Dean doesn't have the nomination sewn up and there is a lot of time in between for mind changing. Clark as president would be just fine with me. :thumbsup: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
63. And Dean as president would be just fine with me!
The point is -

we must win

we must win

we must win

and we must nominate whoever we feel has the best chance of being our "heavyweight" and winning. Ordinarily, I don't think that Clark is a second position kind of guy; however, due to his being new to the political world, he might well make an exception. Also, being VP would give him precious years to keep his name in front of the public, in the second highest position in the land, primed to run for president in the future.

In any event, we NEED a VP candidate who is as strong as our presidential candidate. This will help safeguard our president when he takes office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
66. That's typical thing for him to say while still running
But if he's defeated for the nomination and he recognizes that his name on the ballot can help save lives and might help end the administration he clearly recognizes as harmful to the country, certainly he'd need to reconsider.

Clark is a man who's always done his duty to his country when called upon. I don't see that changing just because he might lose a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_boxer_ Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. Stupid question...
Can Bill run for VP? I'd rather have Bill than Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Yes-no one can be ELECTED more than twice (12th Amendment)
http://memory.loc.gov/const/amend.html

Amendment XXII
(1951)

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_boxer_ Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thank you...
I was just wondering if that included VP as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
65. That's been on my mind, too -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. Clark and Clinton.
That sounds cool. I would not mind seeing Clinton in the White House again.


In fact that would give me something to laugh at republicas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. It looks like this is coming down to a two candidate race
This was a good move by clark. It keeps his name in the paper as the Dean steamroller keeps moving.

I wouldn't be surprised if it stays neck and neck between the two of them for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
47. If he gets the nod and picks Hillary, I'll vote for Nader
This is just crazy talk to get his name back in the papers now that the Dean Machine is taking a victory lap around America...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BellTry Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Yup
It's really pathetic. Instead of doing something legitament he puts on out BS with no substance to try and catch up to Dean. Is that what we want? A person who has to play games like this in order to APPEAR to have something he doesn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foswia Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. Ya. Dean doesn't do this *rolls eyes*
Ha. You mean like dean 'appearing' to be this great liberal? Even my New Democratic friends who live in VT say he’s not a liberal.

Talk to the people of Vermont, don’t you think they know something you don’t?

Running against the war doesn’t make a campaign, anger is all flash and no substance. There is a reason he was steamrolled on MTP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foswia Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Thanks, "Democrats" like you who cost us 2000.
If this crazy talk makes him win, maybe he has a point. No one but mindless zealots like you find yourself locking up the race for your candidate so early. Kerry’s camp said the same about dean, its ironic that Dean voters say the same about Clark.

The race is not over.

I’ve been aware of her consideration for months. Try reading more than DU posts.

ANYONE BUT BUSH IN 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. Stop with the infantile Nader crap
Edited on Tue Dec-09-03 08:33 PM by JoFerret
and stop right now. What foolish nonsense. Vote for Bush if that is who you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
48. A two-term President could also be a Vice President
The way the amendment is written he could "fill in" an unfinished term, plus having two of his own, so if Clark wanted Bill he could have him, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
60. I'm not a Clark supporter, but
you'd be pressed to find anything really BAD I've said about him. I am mostly skeptical of Wes Clark and I prefer not to have a military leader running our country. That's just me, personally, you know.

I have to say though, if Clark were really serious about this, he should have done it on a different day than the Gore/Dean announcement. It makes Clark look desperate to take the spotlight. (Kerry perfects that trait. Don't you start, too, Wes!!)

Gore and Clinton were the poll leaders for quite a while (in some polls, still are), so to try to trump Al Gore's endorsement of Dean on the SAME DAY looks like something a novice would do. I hope he didn't do it on purpose. I would hope he has better advisors than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. I dont think that would be a good move...
there is just too much involved with the Clinton name...Bill has the political savvy, Hillary has to try too hard...she wouldn't make it...I like her, but Bill had a gift, she just doesnt have it in the same way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. How many VPs have gone on to become President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. for that matter, how many Presidents have gone on to become VP?
could the Big Dog be nominated for VP? i suppose the possibility that he might become Pres would preclude that. 8^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #62
78. A lot become VP with the intention of being president...
I dont understand your point?

Hilary is too polarizing...the appeal of Clark is that those ole "Nascar guys" will respect his 34 years of military service...you think these swing voters would vote for anyone with Hilary on the ticket...I dont...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. My point is, if Hillary has Presidential ambitions,
would she consider running as VP to anybody else? In post-war
history, I believe most Presidents have come from outside the
White House, yes? Nixon is the only one I can think of who rose
from VP to the top office, and that wasn't immediately. So I
wonder if anyone serious about becoming President would prefer
to wait and run at the head of a ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romberry Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
69. Just another example illustrating why political novices...
...should not make their first run a run for the highest office in the land.

Hillary Clinton is a classy lady but a damned polarizing figure. She plays about as well south of the Mason-Dixon line as Lucifer. In addition to that, there is no way she would ever settle for the VP slot. She's a senator and has pledged to the state of New York that she is not a candidate for any higher office. I belive her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRK7376 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
73. Cool possibilities!
That will sure make Rush and Faux spin...Go Wesley!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC