Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Steele: Adopt unused clinic embryos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:43 PM
Original message
Steele: Adopt unused clinic embryos

http://www.market-day.net/article_35816/20061029/Steele:-Adopt-unused-clinic-embryos.php

Steele: Adopt unused clinic embryos

<snip>

Some of the sharpest exchanges came on the topic of embryonic stem cell research, which Democratic Rep. Ben Cardin supports and Republican Lt. Gov. Michael Steele opposes.

...

Sunday, TV host Tim Russert asked Steele why he opposed using federal money for stem cell research that would use unneeded embryos usually thrown away by fertility clinics.

"We have 400,000 (unneeded embryos in storage), I think, across the country," Steele said. "I would pursue options that would allow us to look at adoption of some of those embryos," at least for those which are viable.

"I see that as a life, and I don't think that we should use federal funds to (destroy embryos in stem cell research), and that's the difference to me," he added.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not? I got some room in the freezer!
(High hat)

Take my wife. Please....

I just flew in from Cleveland....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Just don't put them next to the Caviar, they might accidently be eaten. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. gives new meaning to
Roe.....V Wade :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. ROFL!!!! Good one!!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Are these guys for real? Are they that crazy? Anyway, it was a pretty lame and weak point because they know that they have nothing.
And I don't know enough about how they are used, but are any of these supposed 400k even considered for such a use? I somehow can't imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about feeding and clothing some post-born humans?
Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Their attitude is the subhumans are lazy Let them starve
Unless of course they are willing to work for $2.00 an hour.

They would love to turn these embryos into Clone soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Question: What if gay adoption extends to embryos? What does Steele say then?
Don't you think a petri dish blastocyst deserves a mother AND a father? Where are Gary Larsen and The Far Side when you really need them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. And what about all those living, breathing children who need families?
Did Steele mention them? :eyes:

Repugs are always more concerned with the welfare of an embryo than the welfare of a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. They always conveniently ignore that question.
They harrumpf and look disgusted when youu point out they are only looking for little babies to adopt when there are so many children that need homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Silly. They're already born. He doesn't have to give a * about
them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. You can't be AGAINST embryonic stem cell research
and FOR in-vitro fertilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is "living should starve and the eggs should be adopted" crowd.
wackos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Funny thing is, they'd rather flush them than let gays adopt them.
Yeah, that's just what we need in this country, 400,000 more kids when we can't feed or take care of the ones who are already here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. It's crazy. Totally messed up and crazy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I like Chris Matthews' question
as to in the case of a house fire and only one could be taken out, would a person rescue their 3-year-old child or a frozen embryo in a petri dish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. bwahahaha, lol, save the embryo over the 3 yr. old! That's what the fundies would do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
73. Tweety SAID that?
Dang, the things I miss these days...

(I stopped watching him months ago, so this is news to me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. why doesn't this fucker adopt all the foster kids who can't find permanent
homes in this country? What a fuckwad. I'm so sick of these jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. That is my favorite thing to harp on. They don't give a fuck about
kids once they are out of the womb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. I totally agree. In fact these asses want to kill the young people off for their insane wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh yea.....
Then maybe we can apply for federal child support assitance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tim Russert should have asked him
are these adoptions going to begin with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Adopt and donate for research
Can I do that? I'll sign up right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Madonna's house is full. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. All good God-fearing, fundie women should offer their bodies
up as baby vessels. If they start young enough, they could foster a good 10-15 before their baby birthing years are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Alot more than that.
You can go on well past menopause, when the embryos are from donor eggs. If she starts at age 20, she could go on for a good forty years. If she doesn't, then that means that she hates babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Heck, why stop at 15?
If a woman's childbearing years are, say, from 14 to 44, you could squeeze THIRTY snowflake babies out of her with a little effort and luck.

Ok, now where to find the 10,000 lucky little ladies who will get the honors? I suggest the local fundie megachurch. They can hold lotteries for the "privilege". And if you bow out of the lottery, you get excommunicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. But that would greatly increase their numbers
I say we don't let the fundies breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Snowflake Babies: None are alike and all are White.
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 05:43 PM by IanDB1
Credit to Louis Black.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Not all. We have a test case coming up soon here in Texas.
The mother is African, naturalized, and her ex-husband is white, and they made some embryos, but the marriage fell apart. He wants the embryos destroyed. She wants to have the children. Lots of hypotheticals happening with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
47. Those aren't "Snowflake Babies."
Snowflake Babies are unwanted frozen embryos adopted by am unrelated third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. We should give out frozen embryos for Halloween.
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 05:46 PM by IanDB1
Keep little petri dishes in a thermos with some water and dry ice in it, so you get that nifty CO2 fog coming out.

Give each child a petri dish, with instructions on it telling them to find a womb for the tiny little baby inside before they murder it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Said it before, saying it again.
"We love the babies UNTIL they're born!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
52. Don't say "WE" - it's just Republicans
most of us would rather fight for the child after it's born in hopes to give it a chance to live the American Dream (or what's left of it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Sorry, didn't make that very clear.
I hoped the quotes around the statement would signify that it was being said by the Repugs. Hence "they" are the "we" in the quote. (?!?)

Sorry that came out in the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Am I in the right place?
Is this LBN, or did I slip into the Humor Forum? Or perhaps the Comic Book Forum?

My second gut response is that I was relinquished and adopted in the early 50s. I have suffered plenty of identity, self esteem and social problems. I can't IMAGINE how one of Steele's adoptees would grow up feeling!

'I was in a petri dish in a freezer for a long time, then some Republican moron saved me from the trash, allowed another Republican moron to carry me to term then give me away to <God knows who/what>. Then the Republicans completely forgot about me.'

Wow. What an esteem builder. No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. I just had my menstural period. Another egg gone. Another potential in the trash.
am I going to hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Shame on you. Why didn't you sort through
the mess and save it for later fertilization by some volunteer, to be raised by some reich-leaning, goose-stepping family?

Just kidding. My eggs are pretty much kaput now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
50. I know, I am sure someone would want to raise a bunch of babies with Downs syndrome
old eggs and all that. The most difficult part was finding small enough knitting needles to knit tiny enough little caps to keep their little heads warm at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Off to jail with you, you've just "killed another baby!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Couples have to Consent
for anything to be done with their frozen embryos. If these couples are consenting to have them used for stem cell research, it is obvious they don't want anymore children. If you don't want anymore children, why would you want to have them implanted in somebody else and then have somebody else raise them? My guess would be that they would probably discard them if they aren't being used for research.

It doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Is Steele doing debate prep with Alan Keyes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
58. Or Sam "Talking Embryo" Brownshirt?
er, Brownback...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. What a dumbass. A donor may have real issues with someone
adopting their leftover embryos to raise. I think it should be left up to the donor what should happen with their own embryos whether they opt for destroyed, stem cell research, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spangle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Legal problems
I see that happening.

The embryo implanted into a different 'mom' with a different dad, will not look like the rest of the family. Family medical history would be a 'joke.' Basicly, they are 'adopted' kids. And many adoptied kids want to know who 'made' them. Where they 'came from.' And do they have brothers and/or sisters out there.

However, the Mothers who BIRTHED them, will NOT feel like adopited parents. Will not 'understand' wanting to 'know', etc. The familys either.

When the mad doctor went around using his own sperm to make the embryos used in his practice, he made lots of 'siblings' who may grow to marry each other. Using adopted embryos causes the same conerns.

Adoption now days is pretty risky. Parents come back latter and want their kids back. Fight the adopting parents in court, etc. Being the 'birth' mother will not ensure that the mother gets to keep the child. The child will have 2 mothers, 2 fathers. All ready are cases were embryos have been mistakenly implanted into the wrong womb. Then it's a case of what is best for the child. Parents against parents. who ever is handling the 'stress' of the situation, is the group that more likely wins. Pretty sad.

How does one explain to grown person why they allowed them to be adopited when they were just an embryo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. I had forgotten about the mad doctor making embryos. I wonder
if those kids will ever think about having DNA tests on someone they would want to marry. What a nightmare for them. Is that doctor in prison?

I've never even thought about some of the scenarios you came up with.....I'm sure the idiot proposing this hasn't either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeygirl Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
67. I thought it was an interesting idea. I freely admit that I have no
clue if it actually is possible or a realistic option.

As for adoption being risky, usually, it's cases were kids are pulled out of the original home and put into the foster care system, then adopted where there are complications because these kids weren't willfully put up for adoption. Relinquishing a child at birth is a lot different than having your kid taken from you-when you fully intended to parent the child, then finding out that the foster family wants to adopt him or her.

But you are right in that this would be a whole new area for case law. Current adoption laws are very antiquated at best, and barely recognize open or semi-open adoption arrangements. For instance, in my state, you can have a semi-open, but what you agree to isn't enforceable by law. So if the adoptive parents stop sending letters and pictures, then the birth parents have no legal recourse. Adoptions are risky - for both the birth parents and the adoptive parents.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. Can we adopt and then donate them to stem cell research? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. exactly what I thought when Steele said this--how much to adopt one, lol???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. And how many of those does he intend to incubate personally?
What an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. And the snowflakes come back again
This does go over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
42.  Perhaps these embryos could be stored with Ted William's frozen head
To be thawed out later, when science has invented the artificial womb and robotic parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. My God these people are sick and twisted
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 10:44 PM by depakid
Just when you think you've heard every stupid thing a Republican fundamentalist might say- they come up with some even more inane.

That anyone in Maryland would vote for such an idiot is proof positive of the irreversible decline in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. He sure fucking weaseled his way out of that question.
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 11:01 PM by Placebo
Tim Russert asks him, since his opposition to embryonic stem cell research is that "it destroys life" what should be done about fertilization clinics across Maryland and the nation which routinely discard fertilized embryos not used by couples for invitro, and he says he WON'T tell THEM not to do it, and then says we need to "look into" options for those embryos like adoption.

What a fucking retard.

And he brings his SISTER in to do a commercial response to the ad Michael J. Fox did for Cardin, and accuses Cardin of being the one out of line.

What a giant fucking douche.

Steele is one of those Republicans that I just can't help but despise with a passion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hear that Patricia Heaton and Jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
48. Sperm & eggs are sacred, but people are damned unless rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
49. I would say to Steele, put your money where your mouth is.
How many embryos do you and the missus want? How about a six pack . . . or better yet a dozen? These people are truly nuts. One other thing. When Dems discuss this issue they need to say the embryos will be "killed" not "disposed of" if they aren't used for embryonic stem cell research. The embryo lovers appear to have a misty eyed, hearts and flowers vision of little cells floating up to Jesus. Nope, sorry. In with the medical waste and down the crapper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
51. How many of them have you adopted Michael Steele
It's so easy to talk about it when I'm guessing you have yet to do it yourself.

Almost sounds like Republicans on War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
53. Can I get an adoption subsidy to keep them in my freezer?
Just wondering. I can still get pregnant the old fashioned way, so I don't really need to have any embryos implanted in my womb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. Steele displays his ignorance of the in vitro fertlization process
Isn't it true that doctors need to implant multiple embryos in order to ensure that at least one actual takes hold and develops? That's one reason you see multiple births with couples who go in for the procedure - more than one embryo develops. But the other embryos do not attach to the uterine wall (Is that correct? typing from memory here, not a doctor, and have a different set of genitals than those in question), and thus perish.

so even trying to "adopt" an embryo would result in the demise of several other embryos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
55. If I put one in my freezer, can I take a tax exemption for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
57. What a Sick, Twisted Fuck-Whack
just when I think I've truely heard it all. :puke:
That's it numbnuts, more kids with no parents,
so are you going to support them all?

Oh my God, seriously please, someone, please boot these fucking freaks out of office! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
60. Saw MTP and Steele was an ASS
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 03:10 PM by smtpgirl
Backpedaling and denying that he said some things 2 years ago.

He said that he could look for adoption of those embryos that were in the fertility clinics, not use them for stem cell research!!!

What the hell are the Pubs afraid of???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
61. From now on, his Delta Tau Chi name is Michael "The Embryo" Steele
with a nod to George "The Animal" Steele, who was in WWF way back before it became WWE, and as hard as it may be to believe, was even crazier than The Embryo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllexxisF1 Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I watched the whole interview.
It has been years since I seen a politician dodge so many questions. Good God, "adopting embryo's" ...is he serious? the host of the show should have taken him to the cleaners on that response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. it went totally over Russert's head, he didn't bat an eye while I was LOL & WTFing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. Sorry Mr. Steele, since you have to have a uteris to implant those
embryos in, you aren't qualified to have that opinion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
68. Can we work on getting homes for all the kids who are already HERE?
oh, no, they're not as easy to use as a political football. And they have, like, icky NEEDS and stuff.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
69. Many embryos are created and then destroyed
as a natural part of the in-vitro process (freezing, implants that do not "take," etc).

A principled anti-abortion believer should actually want to shut down the whole ball game, because in-vitro does destroy "babies".

But that would be such a politically unpopular position that it is just not an option even for RW Republicans. Also too many affluent contributors have their babies that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
70. are they a legal adoption company?
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 08:02 PM by superconnected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
71. They aren't "unused embryos". They're
"unborn children".

Didn't you get the memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
72. Is This the Pet Rock of this Generation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC