Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army monitors soldiers' blogs, Web sites

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 01:50 PM
Original message
Army monitors soldiers' blogs, Web sites
From the front lines of Iraq and Afghanistan to here at home, soldiers blogging about military life are under the watchful eye of some of their own.

A Virginia-based operation, the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell, monitors official and unofficial blogs and other Web sites for anything that may compromise security. The team scans for official documents, personal contact information and pictures of weapons or entrances to camps.

In some cases, that information can be detrimental, said Lt. Col. Stephen Warnock, team leader and battalion commander of a Manassas-based Virginia National Guard unit working on the operation.

In one incident, a blogger was describing his duties as a guard, providing pictures of his post and discussing how to exploit its vulnerabilities. Other soldiers posted photos of an Army weapons system that was damaged by enemy attack, and another showed personal information that could have endangered his family.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061029/ap_on_hi_te/military_blogging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Monitor my taxicab reports too then DOD
the truth will get out one way or the other. Can't stop the signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Wonder if those Fuckers monitor us here
If so, they can go fuck themselves

Take that Bush Butt Boys.

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Under fire, soldiers kill blogs: Pentagon milblog crackdown"
"Some of the web's more popular "milblogs" -- blogs maintained by present or former active duty military personnel -- are going quiet following a renewed push by U.S. military officials to scan sites for security risks."

this story will be on npr tomorrow and is on wired news now. this link is to Boing Boing which has more info and related links to this story

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/29/under_fire_soldiers_.html

this may be a big story tomorrow and i guess we will have to wait and see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. security risk = dissent within the ranks
American free speech = free if you agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You have no free speech in the MILITARY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Correct.
One more reason I got out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This has nothing to do with security
and everything to do with the war we're currently losing, and preventing news of the fiasco from reaching American audiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That is undoubtedly happening, but the instances cited in the article
...are legitimate security concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nolo_Contendre Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Low morale = national security risk
Where national security is defined as Repuke control of the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Big Brother is watching. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's part of the problem....
....they're watching the wrong people. But then, guilty people of nefarious character tend to think everyone else is as bad as they are.

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC