Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI Denies Overestimating Anthrax Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:42 PM
Original message
FBI Denies Overestimating Anthrax Power
The FBI denied Thursday that it ever overestimated the potency of the anthrax spores used in mailings that killed five people in 2001.

The bureau also rejected a request for a classified briefing on the case from Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J. Citing media reports, Holt said Wednesday that the FBI should have determined in days, not years, that the anthrax was less sophisticated than initially believed.

Shortly after the attacks, media reports said the spores contained additives and had been subjected to sophisticated milling - both techniques used in anthrax-based weapons - to make them more lethal. Earlier this month, there were media reports that the FBI belatedly learned that those techniques were not used and the anthrax was not enhanced.

Bureau officials say the early reports of weaponized anthrax were misconceptions, and the more recent reports misunderstood how early the FBI was able to accurately analyze the spores.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6112900,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our they saying they fuck that up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. No shit, these guys are supposed to be the best?
How stupid are we supposed to be? Please don't insult my intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sopunds like another post-9/11 historical rewrire.
That clue about weaponized grade anthrax was a little too implicating...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. The early, widely publicized, reports were wrong?
Yet not a peep.

Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. But still Ames strain?
That is my question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I guess we can't blame the PNACers for planting the anthrax,
.
.
.

Cuz if it came from the arsenal of the US military,

It sure as hell woulda been "enhanced"

AND

now the US military "research" division has just duplicated the virus that caused the 1918 "Spanish Flu" virus that killed 50 million worldwide - -

all for the sake of preventing another outbreak, mind you -

They would never consider using it for a biological weapon of Mass Destruction,

RIGHT?

Oh wait a minute,

I remember sumthing about poisoned blankets(smallpox) for native Americans about 2-3 centuries ago . . .

that'd be a biological weapon of mass destruction, wouldn't it?

How times change,

But people don't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC