Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaked intelligence report rocks Bush election stance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:28 PM
Original message
Leaked intelligence report rocks Bush election stance
Leaked intelligence report rocks Bush election stance
(AFP)

24 September 2006

NEW YORK - US spy agencies dropped a political bombshell six weeks before national elections, with the leak Sunday of a classified report concluding that the war in Iraq has spawned a new wave of Islamic radicalism and increased the global threat of terrorism.

The intelligence document rocked a central pillar of the Republican Party’s campaign platform ahead of November elections: that the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the ouster of Saddam Hussein made America safer, not weaker.

With opinion polls showing President George W. Bush’s party possibly losing control of both houses of Congress in the the mid-term polls, in large part due to unhappiness over the war in Iraq, the report stating categorically the opposite will make for painful reading at the White House.

Bush has argued repeatedly in pre-election speeches that Iraq is the central front in the war on terrorism and that demands for a US troop withdrawal from the country by the opposition Democrats underscores why the center-left party should not be trusted with the nation’s security.
(snip/...)

http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2006/September/theworld_September854.xml§ion=theworld&col=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know we've all said this before but if the Dems can't use this
to their advantage, they don't deserve to be in the majority. No, I don't really mean that but can you imagine the outcry if the situation were reversed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. if they don't use it, they were part of the collective ignorance ...
thus part of the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did you see Frist on ABC This Week
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 12:41 PM by MissWaverly
This report was released in April but Frist did not read it because it was "classified" so
although he is the Majority Leader in the Senate he was not given access to the report.
Repeat after me, Congressional oversight cannot be maintained when "classified" status prevents congress from reviewing nuts and bolts reports it needs to do its job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. McCain gave the same BS argument with Schieffer on Face the Nation
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 01:10 PM by Steve_DeShazer
You make a really good point in that when major Congressional leaders say, as Frist and McCain said, that they are not "privy" to classified materials, then there is no oversight by Congress despite what the Constitution mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. yes, and what is the purpose of "classified"
It meant nothing when it came to Valerie Plame's covert status, they called up the reporters
on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yup. They're trying to have their terror cake and eat it, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It's CYA time for the repubs., hear no evil, see no evil
Exactly, no Congressional oversight. We have us a King! As they say, he stamps Everything Secret. Helps keep you from being prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh I get it now, the bushes were attempting to create more
terrorists because it helps their power grab. They were NOT fighting the terrorists but actually aiding and abiding them. I see said the blind man to the deaf dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. More terrorists = more profits
and bush/cheney are ALL about the profits. Lives mean squat to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I believe you meant "aiding and abetting" ?
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. MIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Abiding and abetting
Works for me!!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would love to see this headline in US papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. did this hit the SUNDAY talk show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. They simply won't speak about it again...
IF they know what's good for them, and the Repugs can start saying the same things again unchallenged./
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. It doesnt require a "classified" intellegence report to figure this out.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. this should be played over and over again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. The problem is that it will take six months for the reality of this
information to pass through the walls surrounding their loyal voters. With the help of the corporate propaganda networks, this information might die within 36 hours and will never be referred to by the reverends and the reverends' helpers - Limbaugh, North, Liddy, Hannity, O'Reilly, Charon, Kristol, Bennett, etc.

It's up to us to spread it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Link isn't working
I got an error when I tried to link to article.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC