Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: Afghan president sees 15-year fight against opium

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:37 PM
Original message
Reuters: Afghan president sees 15-year fight against opium
Afghan president sees 15-year fight against opium

By Paul Eckert, Asia Correspondent
Reuters
Thursday, September 21, 2006; 8:36 PM

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Eradicating Afghanistan's surging opium production
and weaning poor farmers from growing the raw material for heroin will take
at least 10 to 15 years, the country's president said on Thursday.

President Hamid Karzai said desperation after decades of war and poverty drove
Afghan farmers to turn orchards and vineyards into fields of poppy, which now
accounted for 30 percent of his country's economy.

Stamping out opium production "will take more than two or three or five years,"
he said, citing the experiences of former opium producers Thailand, Pakistan and
Turkey, which each took more than a decade to curb poppy growing.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/21/AR2006092101523.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, that's a bunch of bullshit. Fight against opium?
That's their main crop, people are getting rich, supply is bigger than demand, and no one is stopping them.
Wrong war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Mayor of Kabul is drinking again
He needs to go to betty ford to DRY OUT.

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny thing, opium production was down
Until the U S A showed up. Then they started growing poppies again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think it was the Taliban who cut down production. I remember reading
that the reduced poppy crop yields was linked to the recession in, what was it, 2000? Not long after we came in in 2001, crop levels went right back up. It's huge in the world economy. Props up a lot of economies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, they want a free market, here's the opportunity...
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 09:48 PM by Union Thug
There's a demand and here's a supply. What a great economic opportunity for a war torn country. :)

Geezus, dear god, it's a poppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. He dropped about 3 zeros off that estimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. how are anglo-american banks gonna cure the trade deficit?
700 billion off the books goes a long way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. This made me wonder about the coup in Thailand
Maybe the CIA had to make sure there was a reliable alternate supplier available before the poppy crop in Afghanistan could be eradicated.:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Where do these clowns pull these time tables numbers from?
Out of a hat, from out of their asses?

They're starting to sound like the stupid bunch of raving lunatics that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. which they'll lose
Fight longer; they'll still lose.

When there's a crop that reaps HUGE amounts of money in a land of the uneducated and desperately poor, that crop will be grown.

With any luck, the reactionaries won't be able to get a total stranglehold on our media and this period of bellicose posturing will be shown for what it is.

Meanwhile, people do what they do to make a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. It took exactly four years to ramp up production to world record levels
once we invaded.

From almost zero to the most ever in four years of US military intervention.

Funny that. Isn't it? And it's not the first time.

http://www.countercurrents.org/ipk-saleem150703.htm

Mikhail Gorbachev ordered the Red Army out of Afghanistan. The last Soviet soldier walked out of Afghanistan on 15 February 1989. Interestingly, between 1982 and 1989, while the CIA was in league with the Mujahideen, Afghan opium production ballooned from 250 tons in 1982 to 2,000 tons in 1989.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC