Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deployment Math Tests the Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:57 AM
Original message
Deployment Math Tests the Military
WASHINGTON — As prospects fade for U.S. force reductions in Iraq, Army and Marine commanders have been stepping up their warnings that the pace of troop deployments is increasingly straining the military and threatening to cause long-term damage.

According to Pentagon officials, senior officers in the Army and Marine Corps in recent weeks have begun warning that without a reduction in Iraq, the present schedule of combat tours would be difficult to sustain without an increase in the number of forces.

Army officials had been counting on a gradual drawdown in Iraq starting later this year and accelerating over the following 12 months.

But the rising violence in Baghdad forced the Pentagon to shelve those plans at the end of July, and Army Gen. John P. Abizaid, commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, acknowledged publicly Tuesday that force levels would remain around the current 145,000 through spring.

LA Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinerow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I feel a draft coming on...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I feel very sorry for all the people who
volunteered, but now find themselves Enslaved to the Military for the duration.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Enslaved Is Right -- BushCo Wants INDEFINITE War
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 12:25 PM by K8-EEE
Which is why we have "enduring" bases etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There should be a draft
America wanted this war. Now it's time to ante up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinerow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Correction...The Administration wanted the war...
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 11:08 AM by pinerow
and lied to get the American peoples support...there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And a number of US here told them it would be a Cluster-Fuck
Too bad this site was erased in July 2003, losing all the old Posts


If I had the nasty posts attacking me as Un-American and the rest of the Hillary DLC drivel

I could tell those MOTHER--FUCKERS, who called me names to go FUCK THEMSELVES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. What you told them back in 2003
makes you smarter than Bush's god, btw.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I don't know about that
It seemed obvious at the time.

It was and is IRAQ-NAM II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I didn't see any lack of support for the war when I was last in the US
two months ago. Quite the opposite. I didn't see a single protest, not even a protest sign, except for the one entering Big Sur on HWY 1. I traveled north, south, east, and west. Not a whimper of protest, not even now, as Bush pushes for the legalization of torture and a personal reprieve from the torture he's already committed.

If Bush were a leader in Europe or most of Asia, he would have been driven out a long time ago.

Americans support our active duty being recycled, used and abused, for no good reason. It's time for the bulk of those who voted for this never ending war to contribute heart and soul to the cause they have supported with hot air and a ballot since its inception.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. aWoL lie us into this illegal occupation of Iraq/ Doesn't he have some of
TANG duty to finnish? LEt him and his fill the recruiting gap. No Democrat should support a draft to further the reich's illegal imperial ameriKKKa plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. A draft would get our troops home faster than anything else.
As long as the children of the poor and powerless are dying, there is no urgency. But start sending the sons and daughters of the powerful to die for this administration's lies and we'll see them bending over backwards to justify "cutting and running".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. My RW extended family/acquaintances support Bush to the max
They are doctors, bank presidents, teachers, FBI agents, nurses, farmers, tire busters, Bible whackers, and they ALL have kids of draftable age. They ALL say the troops signed on the dotted line, so screw 'em.

I want a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. and how many of them will have their kids will be drafted? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockyandmax Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. or maybe we just change the maimum
age for the entry into the military to something like 65 or so.


Social Security isn't as good as it use to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJackal Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I say let them send their own kids and nephews/nieces/grandkids into war..
first and then after that ask us to sign up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Senator Voinovich (R-OH) has 3 children and 7 grandchildren
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 12:54 PM by lebkuchen
Voinovich was saber-rattling the President of Iran this week, calling him names, saying that the US would never have a solution to Iraq until it dealt with Iran. Deal with Iran, how?

A US military strike, but of course. With what army?

Naturally, Voinovich has no military experience whatsoever. I say now's as good a time as ever to draft his offspring.

http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/newmemberbio.cgi?lang=&member=OHJR&site=ctc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJackal Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Good point - draft those who can actually AFFORD college.....
and let those who can't actually go and further their academic and economic well-beings. These fuckers in congress and in the administration are always calling for war and yet they expect other people to just drop what they're doing and alter their lives for their sick war mongering. This country gets scarier and scarier by the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Notice how they never announced an increase from 130,000 to 145,000?
They just 'delayed rotations' and suddenly, the new baseline number is 145,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. AP: 20,000 Increase in Troops Since June
An AP article a couple days ago said there was a 20,000 increase in the number of US service persons in Iraq since June. Some of the increase came from transferring a brigade that was in reserve in Kuwait, but the rest were never announced.

Apparently, more and more troops are going to get their coming home date delayed again. That will be great before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. But is dimson listening, as he claims? Rec'd. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. all hell will break lose after the election --just my gut feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Coaxing the unwilling" about recruitment.
a friend sent me. sorry but i do not have a link


FIGHTING FORCES in Asia Times

Coaxing the unwilling

By Nick Turse, Sept 16, 2006

US military recruiting in 2006 has been marked by upbeat pronouncements from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, claims of success by the White House, propaganda releases by the Pentagon, and a spate of recent press reports touting the way the military has made its wo/manpower goals.

But the US armed forces have only met with success through a fundamental "transformation", and not the transformation of the military - that "co-evolution of concepts, processes, organizations and technology" - Rumsfeld is always talking about, either.

While the secretary of defense's long-standing goal of transforming the planet's most powerful military into its highest-tech, most agile, most futuristic fighting force has, in the words of the Washington Post's David Von Drehle, "melted away", the very makeup of the armed forces has been mutating before our collective eyes under the pressure of the war in Iraq. This actual transformation has been reported, but only in scattered articles on the new recruitment landscape in the United States.

Last year, despite NASCAR (National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing), professional bull-riding and Arena Football sponsorships; popular video games that doubled as recruiting tools; television commercials dripping with seductive scenes of military glory; a "joint marketing communications and market research and studies" program actively engaged in measures to target for military service Hispanics, dropouts and those with criminal records; and at least US$16,000 in promotional costs for each soldier it managed to sign up, the US military failed to meet its recruiting goals.

This year, those methods have been pumped up and taken over the top in 12 critical areas of recruitment that make the old army ad-line "Be all that you can be" into material for late-night TV punch lines of the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here's the link to that article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJackal Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Let them bring the draft back
I'll show up with my draft card at the nearest jail to turn myself in for refusal to serve. I refuse to serve in Iraq, Iran or in any other unconstitutional, illegal neoconservative war.

John Kerry warned in the debates about a "back-door draft" and here we go -- talk of it has already begun. That fucking country is like a rag soaked in gasoline surrounded by candles. It's just a matter of time because that son of a bitch catches fire and blows up. And when that happens, it's time to remove Dubya. I think a draft will turn enough voters away from the Rethuglikkkans and into the anti-war movement that we'll see recall elections and Bush and Cheney impeached and inprisoned along with that snivelling little Likudnik William Kristol. Then after that who knows -- maybe some good old-fashioned treason trials will be conducted along with some old-fashioned hangings......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fredtheman Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. You'll certainly be
The belle of the ball!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sustaining current levels would require a draft.
Just imagine what it would take to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hmmm, a Rove ploy? Have the dems impose a draft so they get the blame?
This could be a set-up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. The military family is close to revolt right now
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 01:00 PM by lebkuchen
The dems could choose to do nothing and let our active duty suffer even more than it already has, but then they'd be mimicking Bush, who is essentially holding our troops hostage for his own benefit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Not surprising, Bush was never any good at math or science. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. They wouldn't have this problem if they would
JUST GET THE FUCK OUT OF IRAQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. Iraq is no war
there is no enemy to fight back against. our troops are getting blown away and can not fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Destroying the Reserves and the National Guard
Who in their right mind would join up when it just means you'll be sent repeadedly to Iraq as cannon fodder?

<snip>

One senior Pentagon official involved in long-term planning said the concerns had reached such a level that top Army leaders broached the issue of changing deployment rules to allow for more frequent call-ups of National Guard and Reserve units to relieve pressure on the active duty Army.

Because the Army relied heavily on the Guard and Reserve early in the war, many units have hit legal deployment limits, which allow for two years overseas out of every five. But without a change in those rules to allow more frequent Guard deployments, the Army would be forced to consider a push for an expansion of its active duty force, which stands at 504,000, the official said.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stella_Artois Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Bigger army - good
Thats how they see it. They are career officers, bigger army = more career opportunites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC