Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chemical Plant Security Debate Focus on Strictness of Rules: GOPers object

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:56 PM
Original message
Chemical Plant Security Debate Focus on Strictness of Rules: GOPers object
NYT: Debate Over Chemical Plant Security Focuses on Strictness of Rules
By ERIC LIPTON
Published: September 21, 2006

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 — After nearly five years of debate over whether the chemical industry should be required to protect plants better against a terrorist attack, a fierce struggle is going on behind the scenes in Congress to deal with what is considered one of the nation’s most serious vulnerabilities.

The clash, which could be resolved as soon as Thursday, is testing the balance of power not just between Republicans and Democrats, but also between rival Republicans in the House and the Senate and between environmentalists and the chemical industry, all of whom have dug in to defend their views.

But the Bush administration, the chemical industry, Democrats, Republicans and environmentalists do agree on one important point: voluntary measures put into place by the industry after the 2001 terrorist attacks are not enough....

***

As recently as Tuesday, it looked as if the chemical industry, with the assistance of Senator George V. Voinovich, Republican of Ohio, was on its way to winning approval for regulations that echoed almost word for word what the industry had been seeking.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff would have been authorized to establish regulations requiring security measures, but the regulations would have applied only to a sliver of facilities that manufacture, use or store toxic chemicals and that are deemed to have the “highest levels of security risk.”...Approval of the industry-backed measure is now in question because of objections raised by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, Representative Peter T. King of New York, and Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, all Republicans who hold powerful positions....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21chemical.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=094cc5bdcc5b3488&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muesa Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Flynn, America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us
A good read on chemical plant and petroleum refinery insecurity is Steve Flynn's "America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us from Terrorism"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC