Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Learned in '02 That Bin Laden Had No Iraq Ties, Report Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:34 PM
Original message
CIA Learned in '02 That Bin Laden Had No Iraq Ties, Report Says

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/14/AR2006091401545.html

CIA Learned in '02 That Bin Laden Had No Iraq Ties, Report Says

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 15, 2006; Page A14

The CIA learned in late September 2002 from a high-level member of Saddam Hussein's inner circle that Iraq had no past or present contact with Osama bin Laden and that the Iraqi leader considered bin Laden an enemy of the Baghdad regime, according to a recent Senate Intelligence Committee report.

Although President Bush and other senior administration officials were at that time regularly linking Hussein to al-Qaeda, the CIA's highly sensitive intelligence supporting the contrary view was apparently not passed on to the White House or senior Bush policymakers.

...

According to the three Republicans, the CIA said it did not disseminate the intelligence about the lack of a Hussein-bin Laden connection because "it did not provide anything new."

But other information obtained at the same time from the same source that paralleled what administration officials were saying was immediately passed on to "alert" the president and other senior policymakers, the three Republicans said. A "highly restricted intelligence report" conveyed the source's claim that although Iraq had no nuclear weapon, Hussein was covertly developing one and had stockpiled chemical weapons, according to the committee members.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said he could not provide additional information about the situation beyond what is in the Senate report, but he added that "the agency's decisions to disseminate intelligence are not guided by political considerations."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. "A man hears what he wants to hear and he disregards the rest."
Paul Simon - "The Boxer"

Our Prez and Dick Cheney wouldn't have paid it any mind even if it had been passed on.

And tell George Tenet that "CIA decisions to disseminate intelligence are not guided by political considerations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clmbohdem Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To this day I don't get Tenet's motive for this crime.
Nor Powell. Most everyone else I can figure out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I wonder, too.
Blackmail? I don't know why this administration didn't scapegoat Tenet immediately after 9/11...he was a Clinton appointtee, afterall. Surely after the bad intel on Iraqi WMD, right? But they didn't. Even gave him a Mefal of Freedom when he left.

I can only surmise a miniMAD scenario was in play. Both Tenet and this administration had stuff that could nuke the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh gawd, everyone with any brain in the entire world knew Hussein and OBL
were total ENEMIES.

OBL offered to kill Hussein, for fuck's sake.

Hussein was an "infidal".

But GEORGE W. bUSH took care of OBL's enemy!

OBL loves ya, bush!


Stupid MFer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. page A14?
old news gets the back pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds about right nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Note the byline:
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 15, 2006; Page A14

Yes, it's the Friday dump with extra "bury the story in the back" sauce!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh christ, I thought maye we'd have ONE non whitewash report
The CIA did not disseminate it... what BS... so lil miss bunnypants is blameless and those damn incompetents in intel are to blame once again....

no one could have imagined a secular dictator and a religious extremist rebel would be like oil and water.........

go figure........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. I love these friday stories
:eyes:


Why doesn't the media do its job Monday - Thursday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. September 2002
This was around the time the Big Dick and Scooter were making regular trips to Langley, in order to tell analysts to write what they wanted to read. It goes without saying that if the Big Dick and Scooter knew this, they wanted to make sure it didn't get passed to the White House.

Anyway, this should be the subject of a Congressional investigation. Why wasn't this information passed to the White House. It will be interesting to see how much Congressional findings resemble the theory I just presented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. No shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bullshit. I don't believe for a second that they weren't told
The administration was positively rabid to go after Hussein and they would have been all over the intelligence community for any information about him. Somehow we're supposed to believe that Cheney didn't glean this information on one of his many trips to Langley?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC