Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abbas Announces Deal With Hamas (Coalition of Fatah and Hamas)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:35 PM
Original message
Abbas Announces Deal With Hamas (Coalition of Fatah and Hamas)
Abbas Announces Deal With Hamas
Rival Palestinian Movements Agree to Work Together to Create Unity Government

By Scott Wilson
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, September 12, 2006; Page A18

JERUSALEM, Sept. 11 -- Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas announced Monday that the governing Hamas movement and his rival Fatah party have agreed on the principles of a power-sharing government and may soon form a new cabinet to lead the beleaguered Palestinian Authority.

Under the plan, Abbas, the authority's president, is to dissolve the current Hamas-led cabinet within 48 hours. Abbas would then nominate the current Hamas prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas officials said, to assemble a coalition cabinet that would include members of his party, Fatah, other factions, and so-called technocrats unaligned with the leading movements.

Details of the agreement mark the first time Hamas has tacitly endorsed a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, if not explicitly the Jewish state's right to exist. Hamas and Fatah announced a tentative agreement several months ago, but it was never officially signed because of the tumult of an Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip following the June 25 capture of Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit by gunmen from Hamas's military wing.

-snip-
The deal follows contentious negotiations over a unified political program that would satisfy the rival Palestinian movements, as well as bring about an end to international sanctions against the Palestinian Authority. International donors froze aid after Hamas defeated the secular Fatah movement in elections eight months ago. Israel has withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue that it collects on the Palestinian state's behalf.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/11/AR2006091100237.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let it be so n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, who's going to sabotage this?
Hamas, Fatah, Israel, or the United States?

I'll vote "Israel" just because Olmert is on a roll with self-destructive actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Islamic Jihad is my vote.
They have been targeting Fatah members and refuse any coalition that recognizes Israel. If this coalition is true, then I think IJ will sabotage this, as will the "splinter" groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe IJ and Olmert will tag-team.
IJ will commit a terrorist atrocity, and then Olmert, needing to show what a strong leader he is :sarcasm: will overreact with a missile strike or bombing.

That'll splinter things quite effectively.

Sad how cynical one must be when processing news from I/P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Tacit" = deniable and ignorable.
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 10:41 AM by igil
More of the "they'll accept a separate Palestinian state now, and let's assume that means recognition of Israel's legitimacy." That amounts to a two-state solution; at least, it amounts to an interim two-state solution. And there's the rub.

Hell, when you work out the plan to shoot some guy in the back of the head you're acknowledging he exists; when you follow him, you're acknowledging he exists; when you're standing next to him, you're co-existing with him, sort of a "interim two-body solution". But there's a difference between that and 'tacitly acknowleding his right to exist'. On edit: And there's a huge difference between that and explicitly acknowledging his right to exist.

More papering over significant difference in hopes that they don't matter, playing kick the can for short-term advantage. Must appear righteous and acceptable, even if inside there's rot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC