Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voting Rights statute tested

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:16 AM
Original message
Voting Rights statute tested
Sept. 7, 2006, 10:45PM
Voting Rights statute tested
Austin water district sues over portion dealing with minority participation


By JANET ELLIOTT
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN — When the Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 wanted to move its sole polling place from a residential garage to a school four years ago, it had to pay a lawyer $1,250 to file a letter with the U.S. Department of Justice and wait two months for permission to make the change.

Even though district leaders said they wanted to move the polling location to boost voter turnout, they had to convince the Justice Department that the change wouldn't reduce minority voting participation. Known as "preclearance," the process is a key feature of the Voting Rights Act, the major civil rights legislation recently reauthorized by Congress for another 25 years.

Last month, the MUD challenged the constitutionality of the law in a federal lawsuit against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Civil rights groups fear the case could reverse decades of improvements for minority voters in Texas and 15 other states subject to the preclearance scrutiny.
(snip)

The strategy reflects a move to federal courts after conservative lawmakers failed to change the preclearance requirements. Several Republicans, mainly from Texas and other southern states, argued that the provision may violate the Constitution on grounds that it unfairly punishes states for long-past discrimination.
(snip/...)

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/4171585.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. They need clearance to move polling stations ....?
.... but DON'T need clearance to under-resource polling stations? (i.e. like having too few voting machines at a polling place)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There are about 9 states
(Mostly southern states w/ a hx of racial discrimination) that must receive approval from DOJ or a federal judge before changing their election laws.

Texas is one of the states, which is why they need preclearance before moving polling locations.

IMO, this is one of the most important features of the Voting Rights Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC