Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armitage Says He Was the Source in C.I.A. Leak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:55 PM
Original message
Armitage Says He Was the Source in C.I.A. Leak
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 06:56 PM by babylonsister
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/07/washington/07cnd-armitage.html?hp&ex=1157688000&en=bba0b7a224a2ab60&ei=5094&partner=homepage

WASHINGTON, Sept. 7 — Expressing regret for his actions and apologies to his administration colleagues, Richard L. Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state, confirmed today that he was the source who first told a columnist about the intelligence officer at the center of the C.I.A. leak case.

“It was a terrible error on my part,” Mr. Armitage said in an interview. He added, “ There wasn’t a day when I didn’t feel like I had let down the President, the Secretary of State, my colleagues, my family and the Wilsons. I value my ability to keep state secrets. This was bad and I really felt badly about this.”

Mr. Armitage also confirmed that he was the anonymous government official who talked to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward in June 2003 about Valerie Plame Wilson, the C.I.A. officer, in what is the first known conversation between an administration official and a journalist concerning her.

Mr. Armitage, who has been criticized for keeping his silence for nearly three years, said he had wanted to disclose his role as soon as he realized that he was the main source for Robert D. Novak’s column, published on July 14, 2003, which identified Ms. Wilson as a C.I.A. intelligence officer.

But he said held back at the request of Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor. “He requested that I remain silent,” Mr. Armitage, said.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. This smells
just IMHO..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. I wonder how much he's been paid---OTOH he didn't tell Libby, Cheney did
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 04:12 PM by wordpix2
Armitage also didn't tell Rover or the other reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Curly is Full of Shit
"Let down the President..." Give us all a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. So why did he keep his mouth shut until now, and why would Patrick
....Fitzgerald the prosecutor tell Armitage to remain silent and then go on investigating others in the administration? No, Armitage was not alone, this was a conspiracy by the administration to smear Wilson and ram their war agenda through. The whole administration must be taken down for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gee, think of all the time and money he could have saved everyone
If he had told his version of the truth three years ago.

Dick can fall on a bed of swords for all I care, his confession is hollow and doesn't absolve anyone else of their crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. Boy isn't that truth.
What a waste of time and money................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I did it! I did it!
Why won't anyone believe me!?

This is so freaking obvious. It's CYA in the extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's actually gonna take the fall for Rov -- uh, I mean for whoever?!
Crikey! Every time I develop the slightest shred of respect for one of these bozos (see under Powell, Colin ), they go and do something like this to make me realize that they're all the same. Every man (and Condi) jack of 'em. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear Mr. Armitage:
Thank you for finally finding the courage to come forward. The country owes you a debt of gratitude. Now that the truth has finally been brought to light, and I sure that the ... :rofl:

Ya gotta be kiddin' me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. I want to see this "letter"
Earlier this week, after news reports identified him as the source, Mr. Armitage said that Mr. Fitzgerald consented to his publicly disclosing his role. Mr. Fitzgerald had sent Mr. Armitage a letter in February, notifying him that the inquiry into his activities had been closed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, yeah we know, and Karr says he was the killer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a Limited Hangout, nothing more (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Vat a raft of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is nonsense. Purely pre-election BS. Fitzgerald will have the
timeline down and I don't think you were first, buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Libby still perjured himself
Lying to a grand jury is jail time.

Plus Armitage may be right.. but he was not the ONLY source...
we was just one of many leakers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. A fact that Bill O'Racist somehow can't grasp.
"It's not about the sex, it's about the perjury"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. UNTANGLING THE FACTS IN CIA LEAK PROBE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
40. GREAT LINK- Was Armitage the only one who leaked???
No of course not but you wouldn't know that from the prepackaged conventional wisdom that is flying around now now would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Isnt that a go straight to jail dont pass Go or collect $200 card?
Or if its considered treason, then a death card?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Armitage is the least bad person in the Bush lineup.
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 08:04 PM by grytpype
I'm sorry he was involved. But he clearly has remorse, unlike Rove and Libby. Someone should ask them if they are sorry for what they have done and regard it as a mistake. They would not, they couldn't understand the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Hogwash. He's a old hand with the Scumbag Team.
Iran-Contra, mob connections, PNAC's "invade Iraq" cheerleading squad, 2004 attempts to influence the Australian elections ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yeah, like I said the "least bad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Real remorse from Armitage seems unlikely, given his history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Lielielielielielielielielie
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. The dog ate my homework. No! Wait! I ate my homework.
These disingenuous bastards never tell the truth, even by mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. It wasn't Armitage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. In other confessions, Armitage admitted
that he killed JonBenet, sank the Titanic, broke up the Beatles, put the bomp in the bomp-ba-bomp-ba-bomp, and, tragically, let the dogs out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. hee hee hee
laughing out loud over here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
43. Now that's funny ... thanks for the morning laugh
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

In other news, Armitage you're just a sick sociopath. Why don't you rather tell us of your cowardly actions in Vietnam. C'mon old man, you're getting on in years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPaine2 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Armitage unbelievable on several points
In an interview with Brit Hume, Novak said Armitage told him that Wilson's wife worked at CIA & suggested him for trip to Niger in response to his questioning how Wilson got the assignment. One can only imagine Novak's response to hearing the allegation that Wilson, who essentially charged Bush with lying to promote war, may have gotten the Niger assignment through some nepotism. And yet despite Novak outing Plame just 3- 4 days later, citing "senior administration offiicals" as sources, and the furor that resulted from it, Armitage claims he had no idea he was a source until October, just days after formal investigation was announced, when Novak described his original source as "not a partisan gunslinger." Could Armitage really be this dense/ stupid? Is he in early stage of Alzheimers or other dementia? And the belief that just because Armitage was a reluctant supporter of the war, he couldn't possibly have participated in plot to discredit/ smear Wilson is BALONEY! He was still a loyal Republican/Bush soldier, just like his boss- Colin Powell- who delivered very dubious evidence to UN to promote war. That he was part of an elaborate plot is more plausible than story that he had no clue for months that he was a Novak source & that he overlooked/forgot that the State Dept memo from which he learned about Plame had the symbol for "secret" at start of paragraph about her work at CIA. More on my blog...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Welcome to DU, TomPaine2!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Armitage
Actually, Fitz wasn't appointed until Dec 30th, 2003. Armitage said he realized his "mistake" in Oct/2003...and felt really bad and wanted to tell someone...but Fitz asked him not to. If Fitz wasn't appointed until Dec 30th, there was nothing keeping him from telling for almost 3 months. Somethings wrotten in Denmark.

Plus, he didn't tell Fitz about telling Woodward until 2005 because he forgot that he'd told him in waay back in June 2003. Huh.

The whole thing is "senior administration officialS".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Oops, I committed treason, silly me. Oops, I did it again.
A career military man doesn't accidentally reveal the identity of spies, especially not twice.

Once it was apparent that Woodward wasn't going to act on Armitage's initial leak, Libby told Judith Miller, Armitage told Novak and Rove told Miller and Matt Cooper all within the next week or two.

All just a coincidence, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. I call BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. Uh huh
Right. This does not make any sense. If Fitz gave him the o-kay in February, then why hasn't Fitz made a formal statement to that affect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. This letter basically seems to confirm
what was in the book HUBRIS by Michael Isikoff and David Corn. Say what you want about Isikoff, but I don't think that Corn is lying to protect the administration (and therefore, Armitage wouldn't be lying either).

I'm not saying that this is a "get out of jail free" card for anyone in the administration, just that this particular part of it is probably true, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. NO, neither Isikoff or Corn are trustworthy.
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 11:33 PM by ShortnFiery
I don't believe it, not for one moment. It's CYA. :(

Further, please note this factoid: "The Armitage confession was of limited relevance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. So you believe that David Corn is just
taking his daily marching orders from the White House? Reading Corn's other work, I don't see anything to lead me to believe he'd be inclined to lie here.

The fact that I had a salad for lunch today is of limited relevance, yet it is also true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. No, but I don't trust David Corn who I believe has an hidden agenda
Look at his work and most people would concur he's a player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I've looked at his work...
and I don't think he has a hidden agenda that would cause him to lie about this. I guess I'm not "most people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Look again? Or else we disagree.
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 12:22 AM by ShortnFiery
:hi:

Admittedly, I can't put my finger on it (smoking gun evidence) but SOMETHING is very wrong with him (based on the accumulation of his writings) that, perhaps his, an overblown ego, is one who would be easily tempted to "sell out" in subtle ways. I'm not alone in that impression, but perhaps most people don't consider personalities that deeply. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I think we disagree...
though I do see some ego in his work, I don't see it any more than many other writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. No one with axes to grind can be trusted.
No one. Anyone playing political games is not to be trusted, even David Corn, certainly not Woodward. This is how they make their livings and it is all about money and power. And you all know the old saying about money and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
38. Libby, Armitage,Novak and Woodward
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 02:56 AM by lumpy
are all guilty of trying to discredit the Wilsons. All of them knew it was a crime to reveal the fact that Valerie Plame was an intelligence officer for the CIA. Non of them are ignorant of the implications of revealing a CIA agent. But the word got out anyway didn't it, one way or another. There is no doubt in most of our minds that this was a deliberate attempy to discredit Wilson because of his revelation regarding the Niger yellow cake affair. The treasinous bastards should all be held accountable and charged. Armitage attempt to fog the issue should'nt fly. This creep has been around doing his dirty work for the corrupt GOP SOB's for years. We are in real trouble folks if these people get away with their illegal activities, too many to mention.

Pardon the misspellings. I am pissed and have had it with these treasonous bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. I'll tell you what will happen.
This investigation is over for all intents and purposes, Libby will be pardoned. People are calling Fitz a liar now for having known all along who the leaker was and he knew when he publicly stated that Libby was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
41. ahem... cough.. cough... bullshit.. cough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
44. In other words the fix was in?
Mr. Novak’s July 2003 column led the C.I.A. to request an investigation into the leak, a move that resulted in the appointment of Mr. Fitzgerald. After nearly two years of investigation, that inquiry led to the indictment of I. Lewis Libby Jr., the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, on obstruction charges.

Mr. Armitage said he first told authorities about his conversation with Mr. Novak in October 2003, when he read in a subsequent column by Mr. Novak what he believed was a reference to him. That meant Mr. Armitage’s role was known to the Justice Department almost from the outset of the inquiry, two months before Mr. Fitzgerald was named special counsel in the case.


I'm indeed surprised that Judith Miller's name isn't on this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
45. So, I don't understand...
The crime is more forgivable if it comes wrapped in a more acceptable package? Armitage with his heavy jolly, just an old war horse, bull in a china shop personality, as opposed to Rove, with his fish-belly white, clammy and slimy, dr. frankensein personality?

A crime is a crime. Wilson and Plame should add him to the list of people in their lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. Taking it for the team. What a trooper. Doubt if they'll give him Carlyle
though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. The ROSEMARY WOODS AWARD goes to Richard Armitage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
48. yeah right. In a pig's eye
I hope Wilson/Plame sues his ass for millions of lost wages. Let's see how he holds up then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoyCat Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
49. So, how much fatter do you think his bank account is right about now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. Bush promised anyone involved would be fired. Has this scum been fired ?
According to Puppet president Bush, anyone in "his" administration involved in these leaks would be fired. Why hasn't this fat, greasy cockroach been fired yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
52. Taking the fall for Powell n/t
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC