Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force asked to change name of "Crusaders"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:00 AM
Original message
Air Force asked to change name of "Crusaders"
An Air Force Academy graduate from Albuquerque wants Cannon Air Force Base officials to end the 523rd Fighter Squadron's use of "Crusaders" as the unit's nickname.

Mikey Weinstein, who has sued the Air Force over allegations that Air Force Academy cadets were unconstitutionally subjected to Christian evangelization, has complained about the 523rd's unit emblem, which features a cross, a sword and an armored helmet.

"The airmen of 523rd Fighter Squadron ... not only have invoked the term 'Crusaders' to describe their unit, they use blatantly sectarian religious symbolism on the patches they affix to their uniforms and the official logo of their unit," Weinstein wrote in an article for the Sept. 4 issues of the Air Force Times, Army Times and Navy Times.

A Cannon spokesman, Staff Sgt. Craig Seals, said he knew of no plans to change the Crusaders nickname or emblem.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4270732
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds like a good idea. Seperation of church and state.
seperation of fundamentalists of all stripes from the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fundamentalism has driven the military for over a century
Why would anyone start rooting it out now and "lower morale"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. better late than never. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Church and State? Nonsense
There has not been crusade involving knights for a number of centuries. Its a historical not a religous reference.

Offensive to some? Undoubtably, but then again, I am not sure one could find a name/mascot/logo that would not annoy someone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. This image is pretty religious. May be historical, but religious also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is the patch he speaks of...


Seems like a reasonable request given the blatant imagery.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. What were they thinking? Seems like a no brainer to me. Why don't they
just carry the Christian flag into battle then? If they want a theocracy let's do it right!

http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/rel-chr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. The Chistian flag?
I never knew such a thing existed...



Looks perfect for going into battle. Maybe all the fundies should secede and set up their own theocracy under this flag. There's some prime real-estate for them in the middle of the Atlantic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yeah, that's pretty bad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Offends Muslims
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 11:07 AM by JPZenger
I don't oppose the use of the name Crusaders because they use a cross. I oppose it because it is justifiably upsetting to hundreds of millions of Muslims. Large numbers of Muslims were killed by "Crusaders" in the Middle Ages who were trying to take back the Holy Lands and forcibly convert Muslims. It would be as if the Air Force had a squadron named the "Nazi Death Squads."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh, I oppose the cross.
How about offending any Jews? Or others? The cross should be in the chapel only.

I suppose another bad name would be the "Inquisitors".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Mmm-hmm. Also offensive to Orthodox Greeks and the French.
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 02:28 PM by seawolf
The Christians who settled in the Holy Land after each Crusade killed plenty of Muslim civilians whenever they sacked Muslim towns, and the Muslims killed plenty of Christian civilians in sacked Christian towns.

However, whenever crusading armies fresh from Europe came to the Holy Land, they generally had a couple instances of mass murder.

For example, when the Crusaders took Antioch and Jerusalem in the First Crusade, and...I think it was Damietta in Egypt in the...Third or Fifth...they did their best to wipe out every Muslim in those cities, and killed something like 99% of them, along with most of the Jews. Coptic Christians-native Egyptians who dressed like Muslims-were also slaughtered in Damietta.

When the Fourth Crusade was turned against Constantinople by the Venetians in 1204, they killed something like half the population of the city.

The Albegenisian Crusades in France resulted in even worse mass murder. In one instance, 20,000 people (again, 99% of the population) were killed in the city of Beziers in order to wipe out a few hundred Cathar "heretics." We can thank Pope Innocent III's personal stooge Arnald-Amalric, for that.
***

And the little fundie-monkeys got the helm on the shoulder patch wrong. It should be a nasal helm or great helm, maybe a bascinet. Not a close helm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. It offends me too, and I'm a Christian
But then, us historic peace church types always get a little cranky when the cross gets mixed up with military stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
44. Glad to hear it. I would think Jesus would be offended too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here is their emblem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
filer Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Onward Christian solders, marching as to war...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war,
Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war,
With the cross of Jesus going on before.
Christ, the royal Master, leads against the foe;
Forward into battle see His banners go!

Refrain

Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war,
With the cross of Jesus going on before.

At the sign of triumph Satan’s host doth flee;
On then, Christian soldiers, on to victory!
Hell’s foundations quiver at the shout of praise;
Brothers lift your voices, loud your anthems raise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
filer Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks, I could only remember the first two lines. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. Was that written by Arthur Sullivan (of Gillbert and Sullivan)?
Or did he write the Military Installation Icon Worship Song?
(A Mighty Fortress Is Our God)

I get confoogled...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
40. I have no doubt
Jesus weeps when he hears that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe they could call themselves the Washington Bullets, instead.
When you're changing your name to conceal an embarassing irony, it's pretty lame.

And yes, I do think the R--skins need to change their name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not Just Muslims
The Crusaders also slaughtered Jews before leaving for the Holy Lands & killed Christians who had the misfortune to be born with brown skins once there. Not exactly the image I think we want to portray to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. They also sacked Constantinople on the way to Palestine.
Not very friendly to fellow Christians either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah,
Well them Orthodox guys crossed themselves in a funny way!
(Of course, the REAL irony was that the First Crusade was instigated by Byzantine fears of the Ottomons - they never thought the Pope would send an entire army of crazied Holy Warriors.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Actually, that was the Fourth Crusade.
Doge Enrico Dandolo of Venice turned the Christians on that crusade against the Byzantines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Now, if we dumb down our educational systems
back to K-12 level, perhaps no one would know history except as related by Granny Laura, a champion of librarian storytelling mythology. Heads of State would also serve as the the Pope, the head of the ELCA, the chief rabbi, and they could rally their divisions for constant evangelistic control of thought. Once upon a time.... versus In the beginning.... Lions, and tigers, and bears, OH MY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. So 'crusade" is a bad word?
And we gots to stop using it as in: she was a courageous crusader for truth, justice, and the American way? Y'all know who the "Caped Crusader" is, eh?

Ya think there are other words and phrases in our modern lexicon that might offend one segment of the population or another?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. As you well know, using it in this context by this group
is terribly offensive.

Nice strawman though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Please don't call that woman a librarian
She's an embarrassment to a very liberal, honorable profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. and the Cathars (in the Albigensian Crusade)
French Christians who just happened to disagree with the Pope. The Crusade started off as a tool of state repression (of so-called heretics), and turned into a free-for-all land grab and looting spree by mercenaries.

Unfortunately, this IS the kind of impression which the Bush Administration seems to want to give the rest of the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. What if they rename it The Maccabees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. How about the Sacred Band of Thebes?
Three hundred brave Greeks, undefeated for 33 years until surrounded by Philip II in 338 BC. Even then they did not surrender, but 254 of them died in place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Air Force has become a fundie branch.
That's why there's been so much SCANDAL at the USAF Academy.

The rotters outta get in the infantry. No I take that back. Get the hell out of the service.

Go start a freaking cult somewhere just get out and stop screwing up our military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey, maybe they'll change the name to:
1. the Inquisition;
2. the Church Militant;
3. the Avenging Angels;
4. ???

Nope, under the Dubya Administration, they'll keep the name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. There are also have been planes named Crusader
Namely the F8 and the Cessna 303

Are we going to have to remove the name Corsair too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Piracy was a generalist problem.
Unless corsair has another meaning I'm not aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. Here's what it looks like


I have no problem with the name--there are all kinds of crusades--but, yes, I think the cross should be removed.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yup remove the cross.
but, yes, I think the cross should be removed.

And replace it with a picture of Jesus - that is the long haired, white, Anglo-Saxon looking Jesus, so those brown skinned heathens will know the great Anglo-Saxon sky warrior Jeebus was who authorized the dusting of their land with depleted uranium dust to bring them cancer and birth defects in their babies and cluster bombs to blow the arms of their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
37. The whole US military machine should be renamed the Crusaders.
And each soldier guiven a white jesus icon to sit on his gun site
as he kills and dies to enable the theft of lands and comodities,
and the ruinatin of nations ...

Just like in the old days.



The Cannibals of Ma’arra

From the very beginning, during the Crusades (1096-1100 A.D.), the Crusaders gained themselves a reputation for their barbaric behavior amongst the Muslim inhabitants of Syria, and much of that reputation would appear to have been founded on the horrific events which occurred at Ma’arra al-Numan. Following the fall of Antioch, the Crusaders raided the surrounding countryside in the lean winter months failing to bring in anything like sufficient supplies to feed their large numbers. They laid siege on the town of Ma’arra al-Numan. As many as 20,000 of its inhabitants are reported to have been massacred, despite assurances that their lives would be spared.
But if such events were common during those times, what happened next was certainly not. The Christian soldiers started to cannibalize Muslim Men, Women and Children. Men and Women were boiled then eaten. Children were barbequed on spits, somewhat like a shish-kabob. In a letter to the Pope one of the Crusader commanders wrote; Radulph of Caen wrote explicitly how: "In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults alive in cooking-pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled." For centuries afterwards, the image of the Crusaders as fanatical cannibals lived on in Arabic, Persian, and Turkish literature. Some Arab commentators have even suggested that the behavior of the Crusaders was born not of necessity, but rather out of fanaticism, their religious fervor leading them to view the Muslims as lower than animals. Thus Amin Maalouf, in his book The Crusades through Arab Eyes, points to the words of the Crusader chronicler, Albert of Aix, who wrote: "Not only did our troops not shrink from eating dead Turks and Saracens; they also ate dogs!”

http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http://utah.indymedia.org/news/2003/10/6476_comment.php&h=475&w=345&sz=42&hl=en&start=2&tbnid=pYqI6piSawjd-M:&tbnh=129&tbnw=94&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcrusades%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Guess what, THEY'RE BAAAACCCKKK.
I guess if you were to firmly believe your god is going to cast unbelievers into a literal lake of fire and an eternal torment of being burnt alive in hell, then it wouldn't be a huge step to start the process by setting fire to them on earth. After all, being burnt alive on earth would only be a small foretaste of the oficial, god approved punishment they will endure throughout eternity.

That's what's scary about today's fundamentalist wacko reconstrucionistS. They are every bit as convinced as the crusaders of old that their is a literal heaven and a literal hell and their god is guiding their footsteps so that they are implementing his plans and doing his will. If they were to actually gain the type of control of government they are looking for, unbelievers will be lucky if the worse fate we face is a stoning to death for missing compulsory Sunday church services.


A Nation Under God
by John Sugg

SNIP

I first met DeMar 18 months ago at his church, Midway Presbyterian, in the Atlanta suburb of Powder Springs, where he was teaching a class on government. During the session, a teenage homeschooler talked about how he had tried in a paper to prove that the family is a form of “Christian government.” “You don’t have to prove that,” DeMar gently chided, and then added, with more heat: “That’s established—established by God!” DeMar’s lecture focused on the “three governments”—family, church, and state—all of which, he told me, should be ruled by God-fearing men.

The Old Testament—with its 600 or so Mosaic laws—is the inflexible guide for the society DeMar and other Reconstructionists envision. Government posts would be reserved for the righteous, as long as they are male. There would be thousands of executions a year, with stoning a preferred method because it would turn the deaths into “community projects,” as movement theologian North has noted. Sinners in line for the death penalty would include women who commit adultery or lie about their virginity, blasphemers, witches, children who strike their parents, and gay men (lesbians, however, would be spared because no specific reference to them can be found in the Books of Moses). DeMar told me that among Reconstructionists he is considered something of a liberal, because he’d execute gays only if they were caught indulging in sodomy. “I’m happy to just drive them back into the closet,” he said.

In introducing Moore at the Trinity Chapel rally, DeMar told the crowd that he supports a “jurisdictional separation of church and state.” But he was not mounting a defense of the First Amendment so much as outlining an organizational distinction. In his book Liberty at Risk, DeMar writes that “the State cannot be neutral towards the Christian faith. Any obstacle that would jeopardize the preaching of the Word of God…must be opposed by civil government.”

Besides facilitating evangelism, Reconstructionists believe, government should largely be limited to building and maintaining roads, enforcing land-use contracts, and ensuring just weights and measures. Unions would not exist, and neither would unemployment benefits, Social Security, and environmental protection laws. Public schools would disappear; one of the movement’s great successes has been promoting homeschooling programs and publishing texts used by tens of thousands of homeschooling families. And, perhaps most importantly, the state is “God’s minister,” as DeMar puts it in Liberty at Risk, “taking vengeance out on those who do evil.” A major task for the government key Reconstructionists envision is fielding armies for conquest in the name of Jesus.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/a_nation_under_god.html


Of course Karl Rove plays these "christian" screwballs like the proverbial violin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Oh, like this?
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 11:15 AM by El Supremo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. That's a rosary -- that makes me sick
SICK. I was raised Catholic -- the Church is strongly anti-war, and the rosary is primarily an homage to the Blessed Virgin. Hanging it from a weapon barrel? Sickening. And also sacrilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malmapus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
43. Rename it Templars!
Or Tuetonic Knights, always fancied those more :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC