Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fed Members Saw Pause as `Close Call'; Unsure of Further Moves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:12 PM
Original message
Fed Members Saw Pause as `Close Call'; Unsure of Further Moves
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awU.n8sp706Y&refer=home

By Scott Lanman

Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials saw their decision to suspend a two-year run of interest-rate increases as a ``close call'' and were unsure whether they would further raise borrowing costs, records of their last meeting showed.

``Many members thought that the decision to keep policy unchanged at this meeting was a close call and noted that additional firming could well be needed,'' the Fed said in minutes of the Aug. 8 meeting, released in Washington today. ``Members generally saw limited risk in deferring further policy tightening that might prove necessary.''

The records detail how central bankers wrestled with a dilemma: raise rates because of higher inflation fueled by an increase in energy costs, or hold back because of a housing slump that's weakening the economy's expansion. Most voting Fed members felt that the current rate stance may prove ``consistent with satisfactory economic performance.''

The 9-1 decision, which left the benchmark lending rate at 5.25 percent, was the first of Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's tenure to feature an opposing vote.

The dissenter, Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker, wanted an 18th quarter-point increase because economic growth was not likely to slow enough to reduce inflation. In his view, ``further tightening was needed to bring inflation down more rapidly than would be the case if the policy rate were kept unchanged,'' the minutes said.

. . . more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. hold for 90 days till post election then raise 'em again. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Close Call? Don't Want to Tip into Depression Before It's Scheduled!
Amazing, isn't it? Which country, which economy do these people live in? And how do we get them to walk in our shoes for half a lifetime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I suppose the election is too close to raise the rates. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC