Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

100 tons of U.S. milk powder rejected in China

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 11:18 PM
Original message
100 tons of U.S. milk powder rejected in China
100 tons of U.S. milk powder rejected in China
www.chinaview.cn 2006-08-23 20:06:48

BEIJING, Aug. 23 (Xinhua) -- China has sent back more than 100 tons of powdered milk made in the United States because it contained excessive nitrite. The 102,000 kilograms of milk powder, produced by West Farm Inc., was worth about 200,000 U.S. dollars, according to the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine.

The Beijing Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau said the Chinese company imported the milk powder as raw material for making chocolates. Samples from the three batches of imported milk powder were found to contain 2.8 mg, 4.4 mg, and 2.7 mg of nitrite for every kilogram of milk powder, exceeding the allowable limit of nitrite in milk powder of two mg per kilogram, the administration said.

All of the powdered milk in question had been returned to the United States under the supervision of the administration and none had entered the Chinese market, the administration said in a statement.

Imported food must pass the quality supervision checks and meet China's national standards before entering the Chinese market, said Li Yuanping, director of import and export food safety.

<snip>

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-08/23/content_4998678.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. What? The bribe not big enough for ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the FDA's been weakened enough
here, perhaps the milk will find its way back to the :patriot:USA.:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. IF !?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet we continue to drink their apple juice
...I can't find any apple juice these days that doesnt say "Made in china" on the bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's probably the apple juice that doesn't meet their own standards.
They pawn it off on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Come to Australia.
We have such good locally produced juices and cider now that
I've practically given up alcohol and have delicious fresh
juices instead.

I was already suspecting we are terribly lucky to have these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's OK.




When the bad milk returns to the US it will be sold to the school lunch programs.




:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. You could very well
be right.

This is an interesting situation because this should not have happened (I'm involved in exporting). The producer should have been more careful about the product. They should have checked the Tariff regulations about the level of nitrites. (In fact, I'm going to go check this).

Secondly, the exporter should have known this. It was just as much THEIR responsibility to look into this before sending the shipment.

Now at this point, I'm wondering: who will absorb this cost? It's going to be either

a) the exporter or

b) the producer.

Maybe they will fight and split the cost. Either way, it's a lesson learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not good enough for China but ok here.... Sad.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. too much bacon in the milk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. KIck
This deserves a little more front-page exposure, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. first rice...now milk...hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red1 Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is not unusual
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 11:34 AM by Red1
Raised on a farm, I remember my Dad talking about the mills shipping grain overseas that would be contaminated with dirt, other grains, weed seed, etc. This would reflect poorly on the farmers, who were powerless to change the situation. Such is the state of affairs with our food industry, even today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. 200,000 pounds...wow..
and that's before you add water :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desperadoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. This will end up being sent to 3rd world countries like......
Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, Boston to be distributed to inner city schools......and the taxpayers will pick up the bill.

No Child Left Behind, my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You said it!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC