Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military calling out-of-uniform troops (IRR)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:37 PM
Original message
Military calling out-of-uniform troops (IRR)
Military calling out-of-uniform troops
By REBECCA SANTANA, Associated Press Writer

CAMP ANACONDA, Iraq - Spc. Chris Carlson had been out of the U.S. Army for two years and was working at Costco in California when he received notice that he was being called back into service.

The 24-year-old is one of thousands of soldiers and Marines who have been deployed to Iraq under a policy that allows military leaders to recall troops who have left the service but still have time left on their contract.

"I thought it was crazy," said Carlson, who has found himself protecting convoys on Iraq's dangerous roads as part of a New Jersey National Guard unit. "Never in a million years did I think they would call me back."

Although troops are allowed to leave active duty after a few years of service, they generally still have time left on their contract with the military that is known as "inactive ready reserve" status, or IRR. During that time, they have to let their service know their current address, but they don't train, draw a paycheck or associate in any other way with the military.

But with active duty units already completing multiple tours in Iraq, the Pentagon has employed the rarely used tactic of calling people back from IRR status, a policy sometimes referred to as a "backdoor draft."

(more)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060819/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_back_in_uniform

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. i knew this was coming....
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh Can-ada, ahem, cough....
little frog in my throat there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is "backdoor draft" in quotation marks?
And this out-of-uniform troops thing.

Someone went through a hell of a lot of trouble to sugar coat this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not backdoor at all, they are still on contract
The real issue would be retraining upon activation. Most military skills are not practiced in civilian life. Also many are not in good enough physical condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Agree not a back door draft...
When I signed up back in 1990 I knew I had an 8 year obligation. 4 years active duty with 4 years IRR. When I reached my End of Term of Service I was given a DD form 214 but did not get my certificate of discharge until 1998. I spent four years carefully watching the news to see what was happening in the world that could result in my being called up. It was a period of great nervousness. I was relieved when I finally received my certificate of Honorable Discharge.

During the first Gulf War my unit was involved with the training of the IRR called back into duty, these guys were not the least bit pleased with their turn of fate, but they knew full well just as I did that that possibility of being called back existed. No one can say they were not told about the 8 year obligation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. How were their skills. The ones I knew were rusty and out of shape
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Retraining. What retraining?
I was called up last year. Received orders and was getting ready to go. Then they gave me the choice to resign. When I found out I had a choice, I investigated what they had planned for me. 39 days straight training at Fort Bragg and then straight to Civil Affairs Baghdad for OJT. I had been out for ten years. I resigned.

I told the story to a CWO who has been to Iraq a couple times and he said "it's all OJT over there." He is strongly anti-Iraq war as am I. Tells me it's more fucked up than anything he or I had ever seen. And we've both seen some fucked up shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. quotes are proper, I think. It's not an official term.
But it is used often informally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. The original point is that it seemed argumentative.
Edited on Sun Aug-20-06 10:09 AM by Kagemusha
Apparently people view the term as not arguably correct but manifestly false here.

Edit: So someone tell John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, I'll make the obligatory comment. It's getting drafty in here.
However, whichever party pushes a draft will get hammered in the next election. No one wants their kids to be forced to serve in one of the hot spots, Middle East or otherwise.

Those in power pretty much remember Vietnam. I know I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think the volunteer military can handle the obligations that have
been put upon it by bush. If that's true, then we either have to lower the level of obligations or institute a draft. I don't believe any case has been made that the current high level of obligations are necessary to our national security. Bush has a duty to make the case and institute the draft; or to lower the level of obligations that the military is under. Of course, I don't expect him to do either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. well when you are losing a Brigade a month
I suppose this happens. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Call up the Swift Boaters. Send them to Iraq and wish them luck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Amen to that!
Let that 36% of the country that backs King George go serve under him!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. But aren't the military services meeting their recruitment goals?
They keep saying so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm IRR
and I actually just found in the mail a letter stating that they are considering removing me from the lists and gave me the option to tender my resignation before they just issued an honorable discharge.

I feel like Mr Carlson - if they call me then there's real trouble is what I always thought and said to people who asked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. If you plan on resigning get your paperwork in NOW.
Before they change their minds.

I got orders last year, and then later given a choice to resign. I sent in my resignation and they screwed around for a long time before it was approved, and then I kept getting calls from deployment officers. The admin side of the house is more f'ed up than I've ever seen before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. they were going to put me in jail if I don't show up
<snip>

Jason Mulligan, 28, of Ridgefield, Conn., left the army back in 2002 after two years in the infantry. He was working as a painting contractor while studying wildlife conservation when he received his letter last fall alerting him that he'd been mobilized.

The letter was followed up by another warning to Mulligan that if he didn't comply, the government would prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law.

"My family and my fiancee were telling me 'Don't' report. Don't show up,' said Mulligan, who also serves with a New Jersey National Guard unit as a gunner on a Humvee helping patrol the territory around Camp Anaconda, a base about 50 miles north of Baghdad. "And I thought, 'Well I got that nasty letter saying they were going to put me in jail if I don't show up.'"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I hope MASSIVE numbers DO choose jail time...
It's the only way to stop the madness.

Last I heard, there were something like 40, 000 gone awol-
what are the neocons going to do?
Lock all of them up?
Where?

I REALLY hope the troops start taking a stand
against the insanity of what they are being
asked to do.

No more senseless deaths and destroyed lives!


BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Absolutely!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I am prepared to swear under oath that these ex-GIs are all gay
if that is what it takes to keep them from being recalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Someone send them a dimebag,
lighter and bong...oops....Tommy Chong tried this and look what it got him.....9 mos in the Fed pen....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eccles12 Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. I just have one question to ask of the Bush-neocon blind and brain-dead
supporters: "Have you had enough yet?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. they'll do anything they must to avoid a draft . . .
because they know that a draft will turn the nation against them in a very active and vociferous way . . . so they'll grab the Reserves, the National Guard, the IRR, even the Boy Scouts if necessary -- anything to keep the draft inactive . . .

but with Iran and possibly Syria on the horizon, and with their pool of talent running low, they may no choice -- and soon . . .

draft age men and women -- get your conscientious objector paperwork in order! . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC