Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Review of Landmark Study Finds Fewer Vietnam Veterans With Post-Traumatic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:23 AM
Original message
Review of Landmark Study Finds Fewer Vietnam Veterans With Post-Traumatic
Stress

Far fewer Vietnam veterans suffered from post-traumatic stress as a result of their wartime service than previously thought, researchers are reporting today, in a finding that could have lasting consequences for the understanding of combat stress, as well as for the estimates of the mental health fallout from the Iraq war.

The report, published in the journal Science and viewed by experts as authoritative, found that 18.7 percent of Vietnam veterans developed a diagnosable stress disorder that could be linked to a war event at some point in their lives, well under the previous benchmark number of 30.9 percent. And while the earlier analysis found that for 15.2 percent of the veterans the symptoms continued to be disabling at the time they were examined, the new study put that figure at 9.1 percent.
...
Bobby Muller, president of Vietnam Veterans for America in Washington, who was paralyzed from the chest down after taking a bullet in Vietnam, said....“that veterans suffering mental health problems have been under assault, the diagnosis has been continuously attacked in terms of its legitimacy, funding has not been ramped up to handle these problems for vets returning from Iraq, and now people will see this study and say, ‘Oh look, the problem is not as bad as we thought it was.’ ” He added, “This is absolutely the last thing we need.”

A spokeswoman for the Veterans Affairs department said it had no comment on the study or on whether it would have any affect on mental health benefits for veterans. The department would need time to evaluate the findings, the spokeswoman said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/18/health/policy/18psych.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. well, duh. let's see, I am just about the youngest you
can be to be a Viet Nam vet and I turned 54 this year,

what other earth-shattering news can they come up with?

Civil War Vets still dead?

Franco? Still dead.
Reagan? Likewise.

friggin assholes. ever think that this population has suffered all it can, and is shuffling off it's mortal coil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Question: What Republican organization...
...that wants to use studies like this as an excuse to cut Veteran's benefits sponsored this 'research'? Follow the money...it may lead nowhere but I'd be interested to see if it does or not. I'm always skeptical about "research" like this. And, has it been corroborated by other studies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
station agent Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Seconded
Follow the money, I'm sure it's as Triana says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Exactly what popped into my mind, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tell that to my unemployed, 100% disabled brother-in-law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let's do the math
ONLY 18.7%! Good news!

Assuming we've rotated at least 200,000 troops in Iraq, that means (assuming the same excellent percentage now identified from Vietnam Vets) ONLY 37,400 young men and women who cannot function well in "normal" society. If they each have on average 1.5 children, 1.8 parents, and .8 spouses, that would effect a mere 153,340 citizens.

I spoke to a woman who was one of the first deployed to and first discharged from Iraq, a medic who made countless helicopter sorties to pick up wounded soldiers. After 4 years at home, and lots of treatment, she was working toward a Masters in Social Work so that she could help others with PTS. She was still on full disability. She was still unable, herself, to engage in any lengthy conversation about her experience. She was still collecting all the pieces of herself back up and trying to put them together.

She was also living in Oregon, where her experience was that liberals did not care about the troops. I tried to correct that impression and told her to listen to Randi Rhodes.


ONLY 18.7%!!! AWESOME. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Great Post. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did I miss something? How are they counting this? Are they
lying as usual (like the welfare queens driving caddies)? I wonder if they're counting the dead and the suicides and the homeless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. My father sure did.
I saw that shit up close - it was not pretty. Frothing at the mouth lunacy coupled with withdrawal and personality disorders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alacrat Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have no doubt many more Vietnam Vets had PTSD,
probably way more than were previously thought. Think about WW2 vets, the average soldier endured more years of combat and on an equal to or more violent level. Rarely was PTSD talked about, or even recognized. I'm sure it existed, but most probably just lived with it, or dealt with it in a tragic way ie.. alcohol abuse, suicide, domestic violence. I think there was a mentality of, you were weak, if you complained about your feelings, so the majority were never recognized. Why would VN be any different? Society was a little more understanding of psychological problems, but still the majority probably felt they were being weak if they admitted problems. Just a thought.......... I'm a firefighter, we have C.I.S.D. critical incident stress debriefings, sometimes formally, sometimes simply sitting around the table talking with your co-workers, but most wouldn't admit having problems from PTSD. There is a level of peer pressure, and bravado that make admitting problems seem weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. my dad fought for 3 years in the Pacific...
it turned him into a functional alcoholic...
he would work, was a good father...but the booze was his way of dealing with the pain.

he died young at 60...and up until he died in '80...he was still having nightmares about Guadalcanal.

they had it...they just didn't talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Until we know better - I'd suspect this is a tool for cutting more VA bens
How can you trust "reports" when you already know they hire scientists to lie about global warming?

You can't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Does the VA recognize PTSD as a legitimate health problem
that needs treatment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fewer Vietnam Vets Are Found to Have Stress Disorder--WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/17/AR2006081701488.html?referrer=email

Fewer Vietnam Vets Are Found to Have Stress Disorder
New Study Is Criticized for Using Narrow Criteria for Condition

By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, August 18, 2006; A03



A painstaking reanalysis of data collected in the 1980s from Vietnam War veterans confirms that post-traumatic stress disorder is a real and common psychiatric consequence of war, but it comes to the controversial conclusion that significantly fewer veterans were affected than experts have thought.

The report's suggestion that one in five Vietnam veterans had the syndrome at some point in the first dozen years after the war -- as opposed to previous estimates as high as one in three -- drew praise from some experts as a valuable reassessment of an issue made timely by fresh waves of disturbed veterans coming back from Iraq.

"It provides a more accurate gauge of the treatment needs," said Harvard University psychologist Richard J. McNally, who wrote a commentary accompanying the research in today's issue of the journal Science.

But other experts and some veterans groups criticized the study, saying it used criteria so narrow that it excluded many vets who should have been included.

EVEN BETTER, 20 YEARS AFTER, HOW MANY HAVE DIED DUE TO LACK OF TREATMENT, SUICIDE OF VARIOUS FORMS, ETC? INCLUDING MY UNCLE, DEAD AT 55 IN 1999, OF ADDICTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Wow. I don't believe that one for a minute. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. The problem is that the formally defined criteria for PTSD
constitute a relatively narrow portion of the spectrum of psychological problems that may actually result from trauma. Only those who respond to the trauma with a specific pattern of symptoms qualify for the diagnosis under DSM IV criteria. For example, alcoholism, rage reactions, dissociation ("spacing out," etc.), generalized anxiety & withdrawal from social contact are not taken as diagnostic of PTSD, even though veterans may display a variety of these characteristics as a direct consequence of their exposure to war-related trauma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sgxnk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. i don't hate to say i told you so
but i was arguing this point with somebody here within the last week

the media overemphasized (not to mention ideologues) incidents of PTSD to help forward a narrative

of COURSE PTSD happens

heck, i know cops and firemen who have suffered PTSD too.

but its prevalence among vietnam vets was exaggerated

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. How about that military tool used to diagnose? It's a FOUR item
Edited on Fri Aug-18-06 07:35 PM by mbperrin
instrument. WOW! If that's not designed to deny treatment, then read about what's recommended by real people looking to HELP people, instead of just sending them on their way:
http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309102073/html/29.html
From: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Diagnosis and Assessment (2006)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sgxnk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. i;ll take a look at it. thanks for the link nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You're welcome!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwdeviant Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. 4 Items? That's monstrous!
Here it is: http://www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/PTSD/PTSD_cpg/content/appendices/appendixC.htm

All questions yes / no

"1. Have had nightmares about it or thought about it when you did not want to?"

Covers most of DSM-IV criteria B except flashbacks and external cues (the famous "backfire of a car leads to a vet diving to the ground" type incidents). Not terrible, but far from good.

"2. Tried hard not to think about it or went out of your way to avoid situations that reminded you of it?"

Covers DSM-IV part of criteria C well enough.

"3. Were constantly on guard, watchful, or easily startled?"

Covers few of DSM-IV criteria D, leaves out sleeplessness, anger, and trouble concentrating. Very poor.

"4. Felt numb or detached from others, activities, or your surroundings?"

Covers DSM-IV the rest of criteria C well enough, except for loss of memory of the event itself.

3 or more YES answers indicate probable PTSD, but that's by current standards, possibly it was once required that all be YES.

Happily the new standards are up to date and correct. Unfortunately, those that I can review are designed for disasters, the ones for combat stress need to be ordered by someone with more psych credentials than I carry (I'm a researcher, not a clinician).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. "only" 1 out of 5? And how about the ones who aren't diagnosed ...
... or who go through a bad patch and are only viewed as "borderline" because they are able to manage their stress?

And as a previous poster pointed out ... even an underestimate like this means tens of thousands of people, not including their spouses and kids, who are seriously affected.

I got a whole new perspective on PTSD this summer, after I went to the hospital for some blood tests, and the elderly veteran next to me in the waiting area was having flashbacks. It was horrible. The poor man was crying and whimpering -- he was probably at least 80 years old, so it must have been WWII or Korea -- and he was also suffering from dementia, so he was unable to distance himself from those events, or rationalize them. There was just raw fear -- nothing else. The staff tried to comfort him, but it was no good ... he was going through his own private hell, and nobody could reach him

The people fighting in Iraq now could easily live past the year 2060. Who will look after them for all those decades into the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. The statistic may be a result of the high suicide rate and death from
drugs and alcohol rate. The worst PTSD cases are already dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Thank you, that was my point. Same as with
Agent Orange exposure, the longer they delay, the older the population becomes, and the more likely they will die off of other causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. And then ... tra la ... the survivors are dead and make the stats look
better. Figures don't lie but liars can figure!

Thanks for the OP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thoughts on PTSD in this article
http://www.utne.com/pub/2006_136/promo/12168-1.html

A little hope for the our collective fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
25. Cross those numbers with suicide rates among vets
and other stress-related deaths. Wonder what you'd get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. Of course they can't count the ones that committed suicide
Or like one of the kids from my neighborhood, died in a drunk driving accident, since after he came back from 'Nam he was hardly ever sober...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC