Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT/AP: Airlines: U.K. Travel Grinding to Halt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-12-06 10:29 PM
Original message
NYT/AP: Airlines: U.K. Travel Grinding to Halt
Airlines: U.K. Travel Grinding to Halt
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: August 12, 2006

LONDON (AP) -- Airlines warned the British government Saturday that the country's air travel is ''grinding to a halt'' because of tough new anti-terror security requirements. One airline asked for police and army reservists to help with screening.

British Airways and Ryanair canceled scores of flights from Britain to Europe and the United States and blamed airport operator BAA for not investing enough in security systems and baggage screening in the aftermath of new terrorism threats.

BAA, which owns Heathrow and Stansted airports, ordered the cancellations because its systems for screening passengers and checked-in baggage for security threats could not cope with the extra required scrutiny of passengers and their luggage in the wake of Thursday's thwarted threat to bomb up to 10 U.S.-bound aircraft.

Budget carrier Ryanair appealed to the British government to use police and army reservists to speed up searches at overloaded airport security checkpoints.

''If the British government is serious about defeating terrorism and not allowing the terrorists to disrupt normal, everyday British life, then it must provide the additional security staffing -- either police or army reserve personnel -- immediately to prevent London's main airports from grinding to a halt over the coming days,'' said Michael O'Leary, chief executive officer of Ryanair....

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Britain-Terror-Airports.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-12-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just Came Home By Plane
Had to remove my sandals==we will soon be a nation of athlete's foot and plantar wart sufferers.

The three days of hysteria on CNN were nauseating==haven't they ever heard of the dangers of crying wolf?? If they arrested people in the airports, in the act, I'd believe there was a real threat.
This is bullshit. Did they even find any "chemicals" capable of creating an effective weapon?

I think not. There was no report of such a thing, to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-12-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe the terrorists plan all along was to spread really bad Athletes foot
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-12-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait, so the British airports are privatized? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Not only privatised in the 80s; bought 2 weeks ago by a Spanish company
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 04:25 AM by muriel_volestrangler
BAA, the owner of Heathrow, has dismissed fears that its new Spanish owners, Ferrovial, may be rethinking their £10.3 billion purchase of the airport group.
...
Ferrovial has had control of the British airports group since July 29 and shares in the company will be delisted on Tuesday. Ferrovial said that it was far too early to know what impact any new measures might have on the business.

BAA’s revenues from retail reached £862 million last year, of which £385 million came from its subsidiary, World Duty Free.
...
But analysts said that given Ferrovial’s highly geared purchase of the airport group any fall in revenues could cause problems. Gert Zonneveld, analyst at Panmure Gordon, said: “If no duty free drinks are available that is quite a severe impact because it’s such a money maker. If airports see revenue from this decline they may have to increase the landing fees they charge to recover that income.”

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9077-2309127,00.html


If you haven't been to a British airport, you may not realise how pervasive the Duty Free shops are - once through the security check, the passengers are treated as captive customers for an hour, stuck in a shopping mall they are not allowed to exit. If BAA have to employ people to search them, rather than sell them booze, their entire business model is ruined.

Oh, and by the way, BAA completely runs Indianapolis's airports, so that was all sold to the Spanish a couple of weeks ago. In addition, BAA runs the shopping malls at various other American airports, but not the real airport operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascaz Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Terrorist's have already "WON" - IMHO
When they can play our govt. like a rusted trombone, and cause our own govts. to curb our freedoms, they HAVE INDEED WON ALREADY. How long will it be before the next "threat" closes down our Movie Theatres, or Amusement Parks? What if they uncover a plot to attack crowds at MacDonalds'? Will they shut down all the fast food restaurants in America? Where's it going to end? There is only one destination that this road goes to, and it's called FASCIST DESPOTISM and a POLICE STATE. And we're already alot furthur down that road than most Americans will admit. FEAR FEAR!

Peace - :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. The terrorists won when they staged a coup
and got Shrub declared president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. This huge terror alert
was an attack on the British economy by its own govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. The fact that there is no threat anymore (if there ever was one)
must make this thing doubly hard to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC