Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman loss offers signs of angry electorate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:38 PM
Original message
Lieberman loss offers signs of angry electorate


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/pl_nm/usa_politics_connecticut_dc;_ylt=AvkmsvB6iZIzG1fzwYavgPqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-

Lieberman loss offers signs of angry electorate

By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent 2 hours, 21 minutes ago

HARTFORD, Connecticut (Reuters) - U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record)'s defeat in Connecticut offered tangible evidence of Democratic anger with President George W. Bush and the
Iraq war and could be an early sign of a strong anti-incumbent mood before November's election, analysts said on Wednesday.

........


Lamont had cast the race with Lieberman as a referendum on the Iraq war. A CNN poll released on Wednesday showed 60 percent of Americans oppose the war in Iraq and a majority would support a partial withdrawal of troops by year's end.

Lieberman's defeat came on the same night two House incumbents, Republican moderate Joe Schwarz in Michigan and liberal Democrat Cynthia McKinney in Georgia, lost in their own primary challenges.

Each had special circumstances contributing to their losses, but, along with the defeats of more than a dozen incumbent state legislators in Pennsylvania earlier this year, they offered a cumulative warning signal for November, when control of Congress will be up for grabs.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, those angry, angry Dems.
Is that the best they got? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. The people are angry. The people interviewed on cable channels
and the callers on C-Span had a litany of reasons why they could no longer support Lieberman which included the war, increasing costs of the war, the loss of jobs, the millions without health care, the Medicare drug program and the bankruptcy bill which Lieberman voted for. This was not a one issue rejection of Lieberman, it was eighteen years of him and the many many reasons they want a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ah yes don't forget Limpmann voted for the bankruptcy bill
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 04:18 PM by saigon68
You are 75. Your only asset is your house.

Your husband dies with $200,000.00 worth of unpaid medical bills.

You can't go bankrupt without jumping through all kinds of hoops

And you will lose your house

NICE GOING JOE YOU FUCKING COCKSUCKER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Saigon,
you said it better than I could. I rest my case (and that's rare for me....:smoke:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sorry I got really angry at Zell Limpmann
I should have been more refined in my criticism

NAH---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. The dozen in PA got the boot because they met at midnight
To give themselves a huge raise, while slashing the budget for everyone else. That's why they lost,not because they were incumbants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think most people are pretty angry right now, hopefully...
it will be used constructively and put in a Democratic Congress this Fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. And why should we not be angry? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ah, the headlines. They be more accurate to say "hopeful"
The voters in Connecticut aren't necessarily "angry." They're just as likely *HOPEFUL* that Lamont can help restore sanity to Congress, and that he'll negotiate from a position of strength -- rather than from his knees, as the senior Senator from Connecticut has been doing for nigh on 6 years plus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC