Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harlem to Clinton: You're Ruining Us

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DYouth Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:11 PM
Original message
Harlem to Clinton: You're Ruining Us
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article1191869.ece

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article


Published on Sunday, July 23, 2006 by the lndependent/UK
Harlem to Clinton: You're Ruining Us
Gentrification since former president moved in sees rents rise by 100 per cent, forcing poor black families out
by Nicholas Wapshott in New York


Bill Clinton's decision to site his office in the largely black Manhattan neighborhood of Harlem, as a gesture of solidarity with African-Americans, appears to have backfired.

Dozens of angry blacks demonstrated last week outside the building that houses the former president's staff, claiming that his move had led to the gentrification of the area and increased the price of homes beyond their reach.

Mr Clinton's empathy with black Americans is well known. His humble family circumstances, as a penniless white boy raised among poor blacks in rural Arkansas, gave him a rare insight into the African-American community. It led to his being dubbed "Bubba", a term of affection among impoverished Southerners, and, without irony, "America's first black President".

But his move to Harlem, known as the Black Capital of America, has had unintended consequences. The protest march by 40 mainly elderly people to 125th Street was organised by the Harlem Tenants Council to protest at property prices, which have rocketed since Mr Clinton moved in.

----

At first I thought the title may refer to Hilary, who's also ruining New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh really? How is she ruinng NY?
I thought that was just a Republican talking point. Please enlighten us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. I would like to know also. (too many broard brush strocks at Hil. lately).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. "She" who? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I honestly believe Bill had no real malice intent to cause trouble
Unlike Hillary who's recent votes really make one wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh geesh! What is the problem?
He moves his office there and their property values go up, and they're pi**ed about that?????

I understand people not being able to afford property there now, but isn't it a good thing for those who now own it?

This sounds like a damned if you do and dmaned if you don't thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The problem becomes if people in one area generally make 18,000
Let's say for example and proterty value averages around 15,000 and by Clinton having an office there causes property value to go up to let's say 50,000. How can anyone making 18,000 can afford to have a home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. It also drives up property taxes
Gentrification is a complex issue. Property values go up, which means that people who own their homes have a more valuable property, but that leads to higher taxes, which can make the person have to sell. And if they sell, they can't afford housing in their area, and have to move elsewhere. This splits up families and friends who may have lived in the same area for generations.

Also, rents go up, so if you don't own a house, you may have to move. And if you grew up in the area, you have to move away when you move out. And if you lease a business, rent goes up. In the particular case of Harlem, as in many traditionally black neighborhoods, the new people moving in are white, and don't earn a living or shop in the area, so business goes down, until eventually the older businesses sell out to Starbucks, and soon it's a different neighborhood. Historic houses and businesses are sold, people are forced to sell family homes. The increase in property values doesn't bring an increase in wages the way a regular economic boom would.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. new york city has rent control
so it doesn't drive up rent for those who are actually living there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Not every place in NYC has rent control
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. I've heard that, but how does it work? Does it lock in prices based on
region, or rental history, or per lease, or what? I mean, an apartment in Harlem will be far lower than one in Manhattan, so if the cap is based on Manhattan prices, the apartment in Harlem can go way up before hitting the cap. If it's based on leases, then when a new apartment is leased, it will go up. I just don't know how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. These people aren't property owners, they're renters
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. what do you think about the story?
about gentrification?

Any thoughts on the subject matter you posted, or was it just about Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. A moderate rise in rent is of course the Clenis' fault.
:sarcasm:

From the article, which is filled with stupidity and RW talking points--or are they the same thing?
A one-bedroom flat which used to rent six years ago for $800 a month now costs $1,400, according to Valerie Orridge, president of the Savoy Park Tenants Association.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DYouth Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hey is supporting the poor a RW talking point?
I misseed that one at the Young Republicans meeting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. You didn't miss that one because you were too busy going over your notes
on how to infiltrate Democratic websites. Last week's get-together was on how to quickly come up with pathetic reasons to explain away Young Republicans' refusing to enlist in the war in Iraq.

("Hillary is also ruining NY" gave you away immediately, Chuckles.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. On what planet is a nearly 100% increase 'moderate'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. If 75% is "nearly 100%", then I guess you have a point.
But 75% over 6 years is 12.5% per year. Sure, faster than inflation, but there has been a dramatic increase in the cost of housing everywhere.

And if we want to protect those on fixed or low income from property tax increases, then we should do that, but we don't have to stifle real estate values to do it. We have homestead exemptions here in Georgia for the retired/elderly/fixed income. Does New York not have that? Fer' cryin' out loud, there's rent control in NYC, isn't there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. And those poor scumbuckets are just ungrateful pigs
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I bet those who already owned homes there are happy.
Few "renters" in "Central Park East". If you own a place there, it'll finally be worth as much as the rest of the property in Manhatten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lithiumbomb Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. property taxes increase
Assuming NYC has property tax, and the taxes are aligned with your property value - if the area you're in has property values rise 100%, that's exactly what happens to your taxes. It doesn't matter if you own your home. Pretty much a standard side effect of gentrification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary gets high marks as senator. How you figure she's ruining NYC?
The main complaints I hear about her are from people who mistakenly believe she's a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Or shudder at the possibility of Hillary/Biden etc. ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, I'd shudder at the Biden half, but
now that you mention it... That's an interesting ticket. As long as Hillary is healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DYouth Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I'd shudder at the warmonger 100% nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. HEY..............IT'S GOING TO RAIN HERE TOMORROW
NIGHT. And it's all the CLINTON'S fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. That's what I said. But the Clinton half would be beautiful.
Unless you're one of those people who believes the smears against Clinton, and think she's a warmonger. You're not, are you? You're smarter than those people, aren't you? I mean, we Democrats have to be. We've watched them do it Bill Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Dean, now Hillary Clinton. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me... let's see... five times, shame on me. Well, I won't get fooled again, I look at records and listen to entire speeches instead of Republican-edited sound-blurbs, so I know Hillary's a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FastHorizon Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. Different Clinton
check out the link..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Read last line of the OP
And welcome to DU!! :hi: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a stupid thing to argue over.
Of course Clinton's decision to establish offices in Harlem would lead to it's gentrification. That's why he did it in the first place. And of course, left to their own devices, landlords are going to raise prices for apartments when the area becomes nicer. That's just the way of capitalism without safeguards. Does the author of this piece want Clinton to move out and have Harlem descend back into slums and unsafe streets? Is that really what he's wanting?

It's very strange to me that someone who supposedly cares about Harlem would want that. Why isn't he instead calling Clinton's move a success but railing against greedy landlords? Better yet, why isn't he attacking the lack of regulations that allows rents to skyrocket in neighborhoods, disenfranchising large groups of poor people and leaving them without homes? I guess it's just easier to blame Clinton for using his fame to help bring an area out of blight. Shame on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. You'd never see this description in the mainstream white media:
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 10:04 PM by Barkley
"Mr Clinton's empathy with black Americans is well known. His humble family circumstances, as a penniless white boy raised among poor blacks in rural Arkansas, gave him a rare insight into the African-American community. It led to his being dubbed "Bubba", a term of affection among impoverished Southerners, and, without irony, "America's first black President."

You might see the story but not written this manner.

I like the British approach.

But I think laying the gentrification on Clinton alone is
an exaggeration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. they have rent control, don't they?
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 10:09 PM by pitohui
i don't believe this for a minute, as the nyc area is famous for having rent control for long term residents and homeowners are surely DELIGHTED at a 100 percent increase in the value of their homes

i would look into who paid these 40 old folks to march

this story smells of day old fish!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, it's Clinton's fault.
Bullshit. Has anyone been around NY lately? Real estate is out of hand. People are moving to neighborhoods they can afford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Her name is HILLARY,not Hilary
and is this a Clinton bashing thread? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Clinton's first choice for his office was in midtown
but the wingnuts all went batshit over that, saying it was too expensive, and he decided on Harlem. Do you suppose rents would have increased if he'd decided on midtown? Where would you suggest President Clinton maintain his offices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. I don't think there are any large corporations based in Harlem
so why should Hilary care about Harlem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm sorry but their protesting someone living in their neighborhood is BS.
I'm absolutely appalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is absurd.
The price rise in Harlem is also happening all over New York City. What a ridiculous excuse for a story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
37. right wing spin on something happening all over the country
or at least the larger populated areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. locking
Not Latest Breaking news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC