Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak on "Meet the Press" Claims He Didn't Out Plame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:29 PM
Original message
Novak on "Meet the Press" Claims He Didn't Out Plame

http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002840060

Novak on "Meet the Press" Claims He Didn't Out Plame

NEW YORK Columnist Robert Novak, after submitting to a pair of interviews on his friendly home turf -- Fox News -- traveled to an away field on Sunday, appearing with Tim Russert on NBC's "Meet the Press," where he found himself on the hot seat at times.

There, among other things, he reversed course in his dispute with "Newsday," now saying that the paper did not not misquote him on a key point but rather that he misspoke. He continued to claim that he did not really "out" covert CIA agent Valerie Plame. And he defended not only talking about sources with the prosecutor, but also refusing until now to confirm he had testified.

Yet, asked if he'd do it all again, he said he wasn't sure. But he clearly did not regret outing Plame, in fact, arguing, with little evidence, "I don’t think I outed her. I think she was outed by Aldridge Aimes before. I don’t think she was a -- a covert operative."

The main part of the transcipt follows.

<snip>

MR. RUSSERT: Now, Newsday interviewed you a few weeks after your column ran, back in 2003, and quotes you as saying this, “I didn’t dig it out, it was given to me. They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it.”

MR. NOVAK: That was a misstatement on my part. I—I’m—I’ve found I’m much better—I hope I’m not screwing up on this interview because I’m much better interviewing than I am giving interviews. They didn’t give me the name. And of course it was not a “they,” it was one person, which I later checked out with Mr. Rove. They, they—the Newsday article also paraphrased me as saying they came to me, I never said they came to me, because obviously I initiated the interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Three years to think of an excuse, and that's the best he can do?
He's turned himself into little more than comic relief on the public stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. 1 lie 2 Deny 3 return to 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hope a couple retired spooks dog him just enough to keep him tense
and tossing up whatever the hell he drinks too much of.

Sumabitch deserves to worry himself to death wondering when the ice pick is gonna come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, Yeah, But...
Public stage?
More like the right wing stage.
FOX, Matthews, Hannity & Russert
are giving him a chance to re-drink
the hemlock on-air and "redeem"
himself in their eyes.
He's always been a hack and a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Big Lie About Valerie Plame
By Larry Johnson | bio

... Valerie Plame was a classmate of mine from the day she started with the CIA. I entered on duty at the CIA in September 1985. All of my classmates were undercover--in other words, we told our family and friends that we were working for other overt U.S. Government agencies. We had official cover. That means we had a black passport--i.e., a diplomatic passport. If we were caught overseas engaged in espionage activity the black passport was a get out of jail free card.

A few of my classmates, and Valerie was one of these, became a non-official cover officer. That meant she agreed to operate overseas without the protection of a diplomatic passport. If caught in that status she would have been executed.

The lies by people like Victoria Toensing, Representative Peter King, and P. J. O'Rourke insist that Valerie was nothing, just a desk jockey. Yet, until Robert Novak betrayed her she was still undercover and the company that was her front was still a secret to the world. When Novak outed Valerie he also compromised her company and every individual overseas who had been in contact with that company and with her.
The Republicans now want to hide behind the legalism that "no laws were broken". I don't know if a man made law was broken but an ethical and moral code was breached. For the first time a group of partisan political operatives publically identified a CIA NOC. They have set a precendent that the next group of political hacks may feel free to violate ...

http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/13/04720/9340

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well he is entitled to his opinion
and so am I. Which would include a trial for treason, followed by a guilty sentence and either a chain gang in the Deep South were it is hot and humid or perhaps some quality time working on his tan at a lovely Federal Facility in the charming Caribbean Sea on the Island of Cuba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is a serial liar
and this latest outburst from him is so full of shit it stinks to high heaven.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. People seem to forget that outing of covert operatives
is an on-going habit of this stupid bunch. Remember when chumpy the chimp gave orders, in 2004, in an effort to resuscitate his flagging poll numbers, to out a computer geek/budget handler that had been infiltrated into or had been turned in al-Qaeda?

As I recall, they were pulling the fellow out, anyway, by way of a faux arrest, I think, when the shitheads chose to reveal his ID. Nearly got him killed, as well as several others, and brought down enormous criticism and justified anger from several governments.

These hateful bastards rely on lies and the forgetfulness of most Americans. They are despicable!

This was, I think, maybe April 2004 and was related to their attempt to portray six year old intelligence into an urgent threat to blow up some buildings (stock exchange, maybe?) in New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh Geez, Aldrich Ames, he brings Ames into it now....
"I don’t think I outed her. I think she was outed by Aldridge Aimes before."

A pathetic, truly pathetic insignificant piece of slime is what Novak is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He also said--------
'she was outed by the * traitor*, Aldrich Ames'

Am I the only one who heard that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. LOL, good catch!
I guess if Ames didn't out Plame, which he didn't, and it was Novak, which it was, he will admit to being a traitor then eh, NOT. The man is a typical neocon, can't see how ironic his own statement is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. He just screwed himself when he said this....
NOVAK: "I believe that, as far as making his name public on NBC, in my column, on any—for any—on any other means is a violation of the tacit arrangement in which I interviewed him when he gave me the name, when he gave me the fact of Mrs. Wilson’s involvement in this case."

"When he gave me the name" is the money part of that quote. He's been saying he got the name from Who's Who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. he's a traitorous liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I bet Novak hears hissing whenever out in public.
He knows he's been damned a traitor and will rot in Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsRBetterLovers Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. There is a difference between...
being covert and being undercover? -Novak Hmmm, lets see...
according to dictionary.com

covert: Not openly practiced, avowed, engaged in, accumulated, or shown: covert military operations; covert funding for the rebels.

undercover: Performed or occurring in secret: an undercover investigation.
Engaged or employed in spying or secret investigation: undercover FBI agents.

I'll let you decide.

Well, technically they are different. But that doesnt change teh fact hes a little troll, a traitorous one at that. I'm so glad that his career is ruined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC