WP,pg1: U.S. and Russia to Enter Civilian Nuclear Pact: Reverses Policy

[DeepModem Mom]

U.S. and Russia to Enter Civilian Nuclear Pact
Bush Reverses Long-Standing Policy, Allows Agreement That May Provide Leverage on Iran
By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 8, 2006; Page A01

President Bush has decided to permit extensive U.S. civilian nuclear cooperation with Russia for the first time, administration officials said yesterday, reversing decades of bipartisan policy in a move that would be worth billions of dollars to Moscow but could provoke an uproar in Congress.

Bush resisted such a move for years, insisting that Russia first stop building a nuclear power station for Iran near the Persian Gulf. But U.S. officials have shifted their view of Russia's collaboration with Iran and concluded that President Vladimir Putin has become a more constructive partner in trying to pressure Tehran to give up any aspirations for nuclear weapons.

The president plans to announce his decision at a meeting with Putin in St. Petersburg next Saturday before the annual summit of leaders from the Group of Eight major industrialized nations, officials said. The statement to be released by the two presidents would agree to start negotiations for the formal agreement required under U.S. law before the United States can engage in civilian nuclear cooperation.

In the administration's view, both sides would benefit. A nuclear cooperation agreement would clear the way for Russia to import and store thousands of tons of spent nuclear fuel from U.S.-supplied reactors around the world, a lucrative business so far blocked by Washington. It could be used as an incentive to win more Russian cooperation on Iran. And it would be critical to Bush's plan to spread civilian nuclear energy to power-hungry countries because Russia would provide a place to send the used radioactive material.

At the same time, it could draw significant opposition from across the ideological spectrum, according to analysts who follow the issue. Critics wary of Putin's authoritarian course view it as rewarding Russia even though Moscow refuses to support sanctions against Iran. Others fearful of Russia's record of handling nuclear material see it as a reckless move that endangers the environment....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/07/AR2006070701588.html

[ladjf]

1. How could this be happening? Russia is just a step away from

becoming a full dictatorship under the former leader of the KGB.

We need Congress, and the Supreme Court to protect us from this lunacy but they are the inmates. Where do we turn now?

[bananas]

Because we're one step ahead of them

we already have a full dictatorship.

[ladjf]

4. No argument on that point.

[Drum]

3. Maybe this is some of Condi's "expertise" at work? nt

[Maccagirl]

2. Wait till Lou Dobbs hears about this!

He'll go apeshit. At least I'll be surprised if he's supportive of this.

[DeepModem Mom]

5. Lou will set the studio on fire! nt

[Skink]

6. This is a good time to plug Ludlums "The Moscow Vector"

great read. Cold war two.

[w4rma]

7. Looks like the GOP leadership is still as nutty as ever. (nt)

[Celefin]

8. Brilliant solution

What a convenient way to address the problem of spent
nuclear fuel rods. Brilliant.

This stuff WILL come back to bite.

Just imagine hundreds of tons of highly radioactive waste
being shipped around half the world and then
disappearing somewhere in Russia.
A country with such a good record concerning
environmental and security standards.

It's almost as if they're trying to force
a dirty bomb incident to happen.
Which, of course, makes some sense.
*shakes head*

[DeepModem Mom]

9. daytime kick --

[lanlady]

10. Prezident Flipov-Flopski...

...must have looked into Putin's soul again and seen a kindred spirit.