Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court quashes Britain's anti-terrorism orders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:39 AM
Original message
Court quashes Britain's anti-terrorism orders
Court quashes Britain's anti-terrorism orders

By Peter Graff
Reuters
Wednesday, June 28, 2006; 10:50 AM

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's High Court ruled on Wednesday that "control orders"
confining six terrorism suspects to partial house arrest breached their human rights,
throwing out a key plank of Prime Minister Tony Blair's security policy.

Under the orders, terrorism suspects who have not been charged with a crime have
been electronically tagged, confined to their houses for most of the day and banned
from using computers and phones or meeting people without permission.

"The six control orders are incompatible with the respondents' right to liberty under
article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights," said Justice Jeremy Sullivan.
<snip>
Blair rushed the new powers through parliament last year after courts rejected post-
September 11, 2001 emergency measures that had allowed police to confine foreign
suspected terrorists to high security prison indefinitely without trial.
<snip>

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/28/AR2006062800827.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sad thats its left to the House of Lords and the High Court
to fight President Tony's fascism :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. At least they have a high court, we have nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSun Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wondered why Tony pushed to shut down House of Lords
Shortly after he took power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, to be fair
It was an old standing Labour policy to create an elected upper chamber. Of course, President Tony only wants it now because the Lords will stand up to him where the spineless New Labour ideologues in the Commons will not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not from Blair's point of view ...
Blair doesn't want an *elected* upper chamber, he wants a hand-picked
one (i.e., hand-picked by him). It is interesting to see that it's
mainly the "out-dated, anachronistic" hereditary members than have the
guts to stand up against him ... I know it's an unpopular view but there
is still something to be said for the continuity provided by them ...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Noblesse oblige" actually works in Britain. Nelson's famous
order to his sailors--"I expect every man to do his duty"--led to one of the greatest victories in naval history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC