Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Musharraf asks Rice for N-deal similar to India

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 06:49 AM
Original message
Musharraf asks Rice for N-deal similar to India
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7598_1730372,000500020000.htm

Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf has urged visiting US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to consider inking a civilian nuclear deal with Islamabad similar to the one signed with New Delhi during Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visit to the United States in July 2005.

Emphasising that such a pact was essential to maintain a strategic balance in South Asia, Musharraf told Rice in a Tuesday evening meeting that Pakistan requires such technology to fulfil its growing energy needs.

According to The Nation, Musharraf also reiterated Islamabad's commitment to continue the ongoing war against terrorism, but cited the repeated violations by allied forces in Afghanistan as a source of growing concern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am sure that the good Dr. Rice handled that 'diplomatically'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Will she ask him to turn Mahmood Ahmed over to The Hague in return?
I'm not holding my breath.


October 7, 2001: ISI Director Replaced at US Urging; Role in Funding 9/11 Plot Is One Explanation

ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed is replaced in the face of US pressure after links are discovered between him, Saeed Sheikh, and the funding of the 9/11 attacks. Mahmood instructed Saeed to transfer $100,000 into hijacker Mohamed Atta’s bank account prior to 9/11. This is according to Indian intelligence, which claims the FBI has privately confirmed the story. (Press Trust of India, 10/8/2001; Times of India, 10/9/2001; India Today, 10/15/2001; Daily Excelsior (Jammu), 10/18/2001) The story is not widely reported in Western countries, though it makes the Wall Street Journal. (Australian, 10/10/2001; Agence France-Presse, 10/10/2001; Wall Street Journal, 10/10/2001) It is reported in Pakistan as well. (Dawn (Karachi), 10/8/2001) The Northern Alliance also repeats the claim in late October. (Federal News Service, 10/31/2001) In Western countries, the usual explanation is that Mahmood is fired for being too close to the Taliban. (London Times, 10/9/2001; Guardian, 10/9/2001) The Times of India reports that Indian intelligence helped the FBI discover the link, and says, “A direct link between the ISI and the WTC attack could have enormous repercussions. The US cannot but suspect whether or not there were other senior Pakistani Army commanders who were in the know of things. Evidence of a larger conspiracy could shake US confidence in Pakistan’s ability to participate in the anti-terrorism coalition.” (Times of India, 10/9/2001) There is evidence some ISI officers may have known of a plan to destroy the WTC as early as July 1999. Two other ISI leaders, Lt. Gen. Mohammed Aziz Khan and Lt. Gen. Muzaffar Usmani, are sidelined on the same day as Mahmood. (Fox News, 10/8/2001) Saeed had been working under Khan. The firings are said to have purged the ISI of its fundamentalists. However, according to one diplomat, “To remove the top two or three doesn’t matter at all. The philosophy remains. ... (The ISI is) a parallel government of its own. If you go through the officer list, almost all of the ISI regulars would say, of the Taliban, ‘They are my boys.’” (New Yorker, 10/29/2001) It is believed Mahmood has been living under virtual house arrest in Pakistan (which would seem to imply more than just a difference of opinion over the Taliban), but no charges have been brought against him, and there is no evidence the US has asked to question him. (Asia Times, 1/5/2002) He also has refused to speak to reporters since being fired (Associated Press, 2/21/2002) , and outside India and Pakistan, the story has only been mentioned infrequently in the media since. (Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 2/24/2002; London Times, 4/21/2002) He will reemerge as a businessman in 2003, but still will not speak to the media (see July 2003).

People and organizations involved: Mahmood Ahmed, Saeed Sheikh, Mohammed Aziz Khan, Muzaffar Usmani, Mohamed Atta, Federal Bureau of Investigation, India, Northern Alliance, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, World Trade Center, Taliban


http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&the_isi:_a_more_detailed_look=mahmoodAhmed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC