Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: In Haditha Killings, Details Came Slowly: Official Version is at Odds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 05:19 AM
Original message
WP: In Haditha Killings, Details Came Slowly: Official Version is at Odds
Edited on Sun Jun-04-06 05:28 AM by pnwmom
With Evidence.

Washington Post says that the Haditha scandal may be worse than Abu Ghraib. And that the Marines blew the whistle.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/03/AR2006060300710.html

"At 5 p.m. Nov. 19, near the end of one of the most violent days the Marine Corps had experienced in the Upper Euphrates Valley, a call went out for trucks to collect the bodies of 24 Iraqi civilians.

SNIP

"Despite what Marine witnesses saw when they arrived, that official version has been allowed to stand for six months. Who lied about the killings, who knew the truth and what, if anything, they did about it are at the core of one of the potentially most embarrassing and damaging events of the Iraq war, one that some say may surpass the detainee abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib prison."

SNIP

"At the Marine Corps headquarters, there was "genuine surprise at high levels," said an Army officer who has been working with the Marine Corps on the case. "It caught a lot of people off guard."

"That weekend, almost four months after the incident, "we went to general quarters," recalled one Marine general, using the naval expression for the call to arms. The following Monday, March 13, Marine officers began briefing key members of Congress on defense-related committees. Their message was succinct: Something highly disturbing had happened in Haditha, and its repercussions could be serious. The alacrity of the Marine response surprised some of Rumsfeld's aides in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. OSD, as it is called at the Pentagon, told the Marine Corps a few days later not to say anything to anyone about the investigation, recalled the general. Too late, the Marines responded, we've already briefed Capitol Hill."

SNIP

TOO LATE, RUMMY. THE MARINES GOT THERE FIRST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. the last paragraph speaks volumes:
The Marine Corps still has not corrected its misleading Nov. 20 statement asserting that the Iraqi civilians were killed in a bomb blast. A Marine Corps spokesman didn't return calls on Friday asking why it had not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Most "EMBARASSING" and "damaging" "EVENTS".
Yeah - that's it AGAIN - it's all about EMBARASSING the repukes - "it's all about MEEEEEEEE"!

How 'bout it's DISGUSTING or DISPICABLE or INEXCUSABLE or HORRIFIC or FASCIST?!

And they wonder why WE'RE still ANGRY at these WAR CRIMINAL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evilkumquat Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not to Divert from the Atrocity Itself...
...but what the hell is up with the language the reporter used in describing Murtha's press conference?

Then, on May 17, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) let the news slip out. In the middle of a rambling statement at the outset of a news conference on Capitol Hill, he said -- almost as an aside -- that what happened in Haditha was "much worse than reported in Time magazine." He asserted that the investigations would reveal that "our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood." (Emphasis mine)

Remove the words in boldface above, and the meaning of the paragraph remains the same, but the tone would not make one think that Murtha is prone to "rambling" or tossing off an atrocity as a mere "aside".

Once again, another example of a reporter forgetting her job is to REPORT, not to inject personal bias into the work.

Evil Kumquat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I heard Murtha and he was not rambling or asiding.
dang librul media and all. Murtha was sternly commanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Welcome Evilkumquat!
Thanks for bringing that up. I noticed it, too, and didn't know what to make of it. No one's ever said Murtha was a fantastic speaker.

Maybe he was trying to excuse the reporters for not jumping on the story though -- by saying that Murtha didn't highlight it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "Rambling" is often a journalist code word for drunk or senile
So, I think it was an attempt to de-legitimize Murtha a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolies32fouettes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. After all this, look at what this person posted Here...
http://www.progressiveu.org/172900-what-is-the-real-situation-in-iraq

Please help me by posting to him too.

(the more the merrier)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC