Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Says Man Too Small for Prison

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:50 PM
Original message
Judge Says Man Too Small for Prison
A judge said a 5-foot-1 man convicted of sexually assaulting a child was too small to survive in prison, and gave him 10 years of probation instead.

His crimes deserved a long sentence, District Judge Kristine Cecava said, but she worried that Richard W. Thompson, 50, would be especially imperiled by prison dangers.


<...>

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PRISON_TOO_SHORT?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. PEDO FRENZY!
(Sometimes I feel like a certain Senator Blutarsky.)

:popcorn:

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF??? How tall is KKKarl?
Hopefully tall enough to qualify for a prison sentence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't quite understand
Don't they have provisions to keep guys like this out of general pop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two counts against the same 12 yr old child
And from his pic, I'd say he looks almost 5'2". What is the cutoff for jail, btw?

Link with more info about the case:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/unusual-tales/too-short-for-jail-sex-offender-gets-probation/2006/05/26/1148524854545.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. He probably would die in prison.
A lot of people just don't care.

I'm sure a lot of people - not me, but a lot of people - will simply say, that's not a valid sentencing consideration. For the purpose of sentencing, the prisons are 100% safe. So the decision must not stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Judge is crazy
This is the part that gets me

"Thompson will be electronically monitored the first four months of his probation,"

WHY NOT ALL TEN YEARS...... shiiiit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ITA- if he's to be kept safe, let him be incarcerated SOMEWHERE
so that people are safe from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. I agree!
Martha Stewart was incarcerated in her home...Why not this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. safe from HIM
exactly! he deserves more compassion than his victim?? what an asshole decision. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. That didn't stop michigan from putting the disabled into prisons.
Edited on Thu May-25-06 10:42 PM by mrcheerful
In fact they stuck handi cap stickers on 30 cell doors in each prison then denied a prisoner that didn't come into prison in a wheel chair a single man cell. In other words, until prison doctors declare a person handi- capped many are put into cells with non handi-cap prisoners. It takes at least a year to see a doctor on handi-caps, then 3 to 4 months after the doctor prescribes a single cell that said prisoner gets it. I have a cousin that is a MDOC guard and he was saying how the majority of handi capped prisoners were mis-treated in the system.

He said it was amazing that paraplegics can find the strength to pull themselves out of a wheel chair and walk up to 100 yards to molest a child. One of the prisons he worked for had 3 people in wheel chairs who were paralyzed from the waist down that got out of their chairs to chase kids down. :crazy:

Edited to add......Handi cap prisoners allow the state to charge the feds twice the amount to house handi cap prisoners then non handi capped prisoners. Noy yhat handi capped prisoners get any better treatment or any special considerations, they are treated the same as any other prisoner, except for handi cap stickers and another prisoner to help get the person to chow, make beds or clean the cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pedophiles are especially mistreated in prison - in part because
Edited on Thu May-25-06 10:45 PM by lindisfarne
there are enough people in there who were abused as children.

But I disagree with the judge - being short doesn't absolve you of a crime. (We're putting minors in adult prisons, for gods sake).

"Thompson will be electronically monitored the first four months of his probation, and he was told to never be alone with someone under age 18 or date or live with a woman whose children were under 18. Cecava also ordered Thompson to get rid of his pornography.
He faces 30 days of jail each year of his probation unless he follows its conditions closely.
"I want control of you until I know you have integrated change into your life," the judge told Thompson. "I truly hope that my bet on you being OK out in society is not misplaced.""

At the very least, he should be monitored for the entire term of what his prison sentence would have been. What in the world is this judge thinking? The recidivism rate for child molesters is high - it's unlikely he won't offend again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Myth. The only ones that care are guards and inmates, convicts don't care
Edited on Thu May-25-06 10:57 PM by mrcheerful
what someone else did to get into prison, all they care about is getting through the day, alive. Short time inmates are the ones who cause trouble, not just for sex offenders but for everyone because they try to play at being a tough con, they usually end up with new cases of assult and get more time added to their sentences. Most of the lifers and long time convicts avoid conflict for the simple fact of getting put into a higher security level with less perks. You really need to take what you see on TV about prisons with a grain of salt, prison life is not any more different then living in the bad side of town, you follow the rules and your left alone. BTW, theres only one set of rules to follow, the convicts rules of conduct. :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: for everyone watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Fact
My brother was a "counselor" (the real guards called them "pervert babysitters") at McNeil Island. In Washington, sex criminals considered at risk of reoffending would be locked away, long after their terms were served. They called this "special committment". Because of the political risks, no one was ever released from this program, and the "patients" (they weren't really inmates) knew that in reality they were lifers.

The general population of the prison frequently attacked the residents. Unfortunately, since my brother was only a counselor (non-inmate residents at the prison don't have "guards" per se), his only defensive tool was a radio. Even more unfortunately, if he radioed that one of the residents was being attacked, the guards were always less than prompt about responding.

More than once, the guards "accidentally" set up the conditions where the two populations mixed - with predictable, and to the guards, apparently amusing results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Gee, thanks. But perhaps you can elaborate?
Or perhaps not.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Yeah I been inside of michigan prisons helping set up AA meetings
I've seen conditions inside of the prisons as well as having first hand accounts from both convicts and guards.

BTW, for your information if you'd bother to check you'd find out that convicts can and do have legal contacts outside of prisons where they can stop the kind of abuses your talking about. After all, why do you think GW didn't house detainees in american prisons, its a no brainer because convicts do have rights to humane treatment. Which is why no male guards are allowed in any female prisons where female convicts dress and undress in the state of michigan. The conditions you say are happening in would be a direct violation of prisoner rights and convicts can and will sue prison officials over such gross violations.

Another fact about prisons, most sex that goes on in prisons involve convicts and guards. Theres a lot of myths about prisons 99% of them are put out there to scare people from going to prison. Number one problem with prison is boredom. Which is why I say BS, because of guard/convict fraternization guards are rotated every 3 to 4 weeks from unit to yard to fence patrol to guard tower duty. Every 5 to 10 years guards are rotated from prison to prison.

BTW the top 3 things that get convicts harmed is 1) snitching 2)lying about what your in prison for 3) gang activities. The major 2 problems dealing with prison violence is 1) gangs and 2) short timers, short timer = less then 5 years.

Most of what you hear about prisons are stories blown out of whack. Another fact about cons, once outside of prison con's brag about how tough they were, which is part of why prison myths abound. Also don't forget guards will also brag about how tough they were to work in a prison. Then there our friends MSM who try to scare all of the good law abiding citizens how dangerous prisons are.

But again it depends on what level prison one is in. The most dangerous one is level 5, max security. Then level 4, level 4's are allowed a radio, 2 hours yard time twice a day, the rest of their time is spent in lock down. Level 3, thats where they send the mentally insane. Level 2, cons are allowed a radio, a 12" TV, And a keyboard type writer as well as street clothes, they also get 4 hours of yard time twice a day. Level 1, same as level 2 except you get a work pass to work outside of the prison. Every level is earned, not given, which means 2 trips to isolation your level goes up by one, assault charges against other cons or prison staff the level can go up as far as the prison staff deems necessary for the protection of other cons and staff members.

Again, prisons do not provide street clothes, radios, TV's or cable, those things come out of the prisoners account $0 means you don't get a thing. So don't get on the that isn't fair kick, tax payers do not pay for a prisoners cable or any other goods prisoners can buy from the prison store or a store catalog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. 1) the people in question were not inmates
They were in special committment, theoretically under the protection of DSHS. I know nothing about Michigan's jail system, but I do know that there was major animosity toward "the rapos" from both the guards and the prisoners.

2) They did sue, and the state was enjoined to provide more than just a head fake toward treatment. (These are people who have served their sentences)

http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/hrsa/scc/default.htm

Short of abu ghraib style abuses, it was about as bad as it could get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Actually one of cali's prisons did something worse, they were pitting
Edited on Fri May-26-06 01:30 PM by mrcheerful
rivel gang members ( human dog fights )They would take a member from each one of the gangs and put them in a cell with a rivel gang member, then bet on who'd win. Everyone from warden to every guard were fired and got time for their involvment.

Edited to add a story one of my AA cons told me about.

There was a guy in cell block d in housing unit 4 who was in prison for CSC 2nd degree. One of the other prisoners took it upon himself to torment the CSC guy. After 6 months of daily harrassment, one of the jail cell lawyers, ( a con with a working knowledge of law )Dug up the tormenters record. He found out the tormenter was doing life without parole for the murder of an 7 yo and 8 yo. He was doing a drive by shooting on a revil gang and mistook the two kids sitting on their porch for gang members, both kids were shot in the face with a 12 gauge shot gun. When confronted with his crime all he said was "well, at least I didn't leave them alive to suffer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Not myth
I've been told by countless inmates that pedophiles get, er, "special" attention from the other inmates -- it's why they don't put child molesters in GP (General Population) but place them in PC (Protective Custody). The reason is not only that many of the people who are in prison were molested but most have children themselves and feel the ped could just as well be molesting THEIR kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. They lied, See post 27. They wouldn't risk good time or level increase
for what someone else did to get put into prison. I'm not saying they wouldn't avoid sex offenders or bad mouth them, but anything outside of that puts them at risk. An assault charge against another prisoner is an automatic 5 year sentence added to the one they are already serving time for, plus all of your good behavior time will be taken away. Plus an assault charge could land them in a max security prison. You forget in todays age theres cameras watching every move a prisoner makes 24/7 which means guards no longer have to wittiness an attack. BTW did these cons tell you that if a female guard walks by their cell and catches them masturbating the prisoner is brought up on CSC charges after the second time they are caught?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. So the 100's of them that told me that
are ALL lying. Not to mention the correctional officers and parole agents who told me the same thing. Uh huh. I believe you over them. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Not the way I heard it from a friend's father who did time in San Quentin
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. ... and The Smoking Gun is there with pics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CATagious Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. this man is obviously...
Edited on Thu May-25-06 11:20 PM by CATagious
below the Law!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. JUST IN CASE NO ONE ELSE HAS SAID IT YET...
Edited on Thu May-25-06 11:21 PM by pepperbear
"YOU MUST BE THIS TALL TO SERVE"

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. the judge needs to be dethroned
she obviously has no concept of what effect a sex offender has on a child--and the long term/lifetime effects that result

when this man acquires another child victim can the child's parents go after the judge in a civil/criminal suit?

what are the parents of this current child doing about this sentence??

too short? too bad! let the prison deal with it--put him in the extra short wing or some crap--but he needs to be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoDaThunk Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree
It really makes my blood boil to see this judge characterize that child molestor as 'not fitting the category of a hunter.' Wha???? She doesn't see something predatorial and dangerous about someone convicted of TWO counts of molesting a 12 year old?

My liberal knee will only jerk so far. I have sympathy for marginalized segments of the population, but enough's enough. He's short. Tough shit. I'm short, too. Just a hair taller than the pervert in question, as a matter of fact. That man is big enough to inflict damage on a hell of a lot of people-- namely children. He belongs in jail.

I agree that future victims should be able to face the judge in court. I also think the man should get to live next door to the judge for the duration of his 10 year probation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Does anyone have the recipe for tar and feathers?
The judge must go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. This may be the most outrageous thing I've ever heard.
Based on the headline when I clicked the link I expected to see that the man was 3 feet or something. Even then, if you're tall enough to do the crime you're tall enough to do the time.

But 5'1? This judge is protecting poor shorty by sending him BACK into society without him having been punished AND putting children into harms way.

Sick sick sick sick sick.

I wish they would throw this judge in jail, because she's a threat to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. He's tall enough for everything at Disneyland
I say give him an 'E' ticket and send him to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. LOL! My thought exactly...
Are we going to start erecting signs outside of our prisons that read, "If you are not this tall (show a line), then you cannot come in here."

On a lighter note: aren't you dating yourself with the reference to the "E" ticket? (Ahhh, the coveted "E" ticket--the most prize possession of many 10-year-olds at D-Land). Didn't D-Land do away with those tickets in the 1960s and go with a "one admission price for all rides?" I remember coming home from D-Land many times during those years with a whole pocket full of "A," "B," and "C" tickets, having redeemed the "D" and "E" tickets early in the visit. Thanks for the nostalgic memories...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. This is sure to set off a "little people" crime wave
any day now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. God dammit, wtf was this gal thinking?
Edited on Fri May-26-06 06:24 AM by Bassic
I just can't believe this. "It's wrong to commit crimes, unless you're short. Then we'll let you off." Jesus Christ, this is unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. beware of rampaging midgets!!!
Edited on Fri May-26-06 12:08 PM by QuestionAll
they were all just given a "get out of jail free" card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. How about at least a mental hospital for the rest of his life.
He's a sick bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. WOW...Let's hire midgets to 'off' Congress...LOL
This is really wild!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. and that says what to that little girl? She was too small too..
Who protects her from the dangers of the sickos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. If we're afraid to put criminals behind bars
because they aren't safe enough places to be, and they do deserve safety, then the answer is not to keep them out of jail but to make prisons safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeStl Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Exactly.
I do agree with him that it may very well be too dangerous for him in prison. I think it is too dangerous for everyone. If he is not being sentenced to death then he should not be given a death sentence. Prisons need to be made safer. I think the reason they aren't is becuase people don't care for some reason. People suck at times though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. His arms are too short to box with God
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
41. Another success story for the vertically impaired! Yeeehaah!
Who says being a runty little pervert doesn't have its benefits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
42. prison, the universal solution to dissent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC