Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSA tested privacy-friendly system (late '90's, shelved after 9/11)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 09:09 AM
Original message
NSA tested privacy-friendly system (late '90's, shelved after 9/11)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0605180150may18,1,7360684.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed

NSA tested privacy-friendly system
Late '90s pilot could collect, analyze data but without intrusion

WASHINGTON -- The National Security Agency developed a pilot program in the late 1990s that would have enabled it to gather and analyze massive amounts of communications data without running afoul of privacy laws. But after the Sept. 11 attacks, it shelved the project--not because it failed to work--but because of bureaucratic infighting and a sudden expansion in the agency's surveillance powers that was granted by the White House, according to several intelligence officials.

The agency opted instead to adopt only one component of the program, which produced a far less capable and rigorous program. It remains the backbone of the NSA's warrantless surveillance efforts, tracking domestic and overseas communications from a vast databank of information, and monitoring selected calls.

...

The program the NSA rejected, called ThinThread, was developed to handle greater volumes of information, partly in expectation of threats surrounding the millennium celebrations. Sources say it bundled together four cutting-edge surveillance tools. ThinThread would have:

- Used more sophisticated methods of sorting through massive phone and e-mail data to identify suspect communications.

- Identified U.S. phone numbers and other communications data and encrypted them to ensure caller privacy.

- Employed an automated auditing system to monitor how analysts handled the information, in order to prevent misuse and improve efficiency.

- Analyzed the data to identify relationships between callers and chronicle their contacts. Only when evidence of a potential threat had been developed would analysts be able to request decryption of the records.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. self kick, cause it appears to be important
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Solid info I assume - I wonder if Evening News will pick it up -n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tribune is reporting on it, but haven't seen any other references...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Trib is rock solid conservative - so that should help - but the
WP/CBS/ABC/GE-NBC folks will self censor anything that hurts GOP credibility - not to say that the media is controlled by the RW GOP, they just act that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. looks like the UPI (moonie) picked it up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Herein lies the difference.
Clinton's policies - Protecting the country while protecting liberties by adhering to law.

Bush's policies - "Protecting" the country while doing whatever the hell he wants.



(I expect to see this article twisted on NewsHacks to fit the 'CDIT' defense within 24 hours)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
too bad I can't vote 2x.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let your congresscritters know about this IMMEDIATELY!
And your local papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC