Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Panel to Propose Exceptions to Governance Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 12:06 AM
Original message
NYT: Panel to Propose Exceptions to Governance Rules
An influential advisory committee appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission is about to formally propose that thousands of smaller companies be exempted from significant parts of the four-year-old law that imposed significant new auditing rules on corporate America.

But the advisory committee's leader, Herbert S. Wander, has had his own recent experience with audit problems. He has served for many years on the board and on the audit committee of a publicly traded company that in recent months has disclosed a steady stream of significant accounting lapses.

Emboldened by what they hope is a changing climate in Washington, businesses have embarked on a multifront assault on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was adopted in 2002 after the scandals at Enron, WorldCom and other companies. They have sued the government to have the law stricken, challenged various provisions and lobbied lawmakers and the commission to water down others.

The most controversial recommendation by the advisory committee would exempt four out of five public companies from the provision that requires companies to review their financial reporting procedures and fix any problems that could lead to mistakes or fraud.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/business/19secure.html?hp&ex=1145505600&en=942cc70561344c78&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. so, they actually resist and make public that they don't want to fix
any problems? geesh. I give up.


...The most controversial recommendation by the advisory committee would exempt four out of five public companies from the provision that requires companies to review their financial reporting procedures and fix any problems that could lead to mistakes or fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. because we all know that preventing fraud in publically traded
companies is such an evil and awful thing.

Watch the specifics.. will be touted as helping 'small firms' for which the rules are to onerous - but the definition will probably allow very, very big companies to fit the bill for exemption.

What the heck, we all know that all of the corporations have voluntarily self-corrected any and all problems since the major corporate implosions of 2002... (if needed: :sarcasm: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC