Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland security group to meet away from public eye

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:59 AM
Original message
Homeland security group to meet away from public eye
(snip)
update A new advisory committee in the Homeland Security Department is free to disregard a law designed to keep meetings open and proceedings public, according to a departmental notice.

The newly created Critical Infrastructure Partnership Advisory Council is charged with sharing information aimed at protecting the nation's infrastructure, cybercomponents included. Michael Chertoff, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary, cited security reasons when he signed off on exempting the council from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, or FACA.

The decision, which many private-sector players had strongly recommended, was released in a departmental notice published Friday.

The council, which plans to meet at least quarterly, will bring together various federal agency employees and private-sector representatives to discuss the Department of Homeland Security's infrastructure protection plan, which remains in draft form. The fields represented range from agriculture and energy to information technology and telecommunications. Participants include the U.S. Telecom Association, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and Internet infrastructure services provider VeriSign.
(snip)


http://news.com.com/Homeland+security+group+to+meet+away+from+public+eye/2100-7348_3-6053795.html?tag=nefd.top

Ever get the feeling you've slipped into life inside a science fiction story?
This is getting to be not just scary but redundant folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. The corrupt cronies make their plan to slice the pie, secretly.
Then no one can complain about the violations of federal contracting regulations or other illegal plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Free to disregard a law...." This sounds all too familiar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. What world was I living in when I was taught that government
was to serve the people and not the other way around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. They are serving the people. Just a very very few people. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. So how many folks on this panel will pull a Richard Perle
and simultaneously sell themselves as consultants, or investment advisors (or in his case form an investment group and solicit investments) using their "expertise" as the hook, and their inside information as a means for wealth generation/profiteering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. isn't that what John AsssKKKrap is doing now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Also Tommy Thompson eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. reminds me of Darth Cheney's secret meetings on energy policy
IMPEACH THE LYING CRIMINALS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes, this reminds me too, of Secret Energy Policy Meetings, version 2.
This is all one bad-A nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't the dimwit make a speech
once about transparancy in government? Something like "Democracies are transparant" in the run-up to the Iraqnam quagmire. We have become the most secretive government ever, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just sent following email to my Senators and Congressmen:
re: A new advisory committee in the Homeland Security Department is free to disregard a law designed to keep meetings open and proceedings public, according to a departmental notice.

The newly created Critical Infrastructure Partnership Advisory Council is charged with sharing information aimed at protecting the nation's infrastructure, cybercomponents included. Michael Chertoff, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary, cited security reasons when he signed off on exempting the council from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, or FACA.

What the hell is going on now? How come anyone in this Administration can simply decide to "exempt" themselves from a law? Laws should be just that - laws. No exemptions. No signing stipulations.

Why do you guys keep passing these laws and then let anyone who feels like it just "exempt" themselves in some fashion? Congress is becoming a joke. And each of you is allowing it to happen.

Start working for the American people, have the guts to stand up to these criminals and DO YOUR JOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. The decision, which many private-sector players had strongly recommended
that really says it all. what are they REALLY hiding from public view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC