Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Florida) State Supreme Court throws out redistricting amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 04:22 PM
Original message
(Florida) State Supreme Court throws out redistricting amendment
BY GARY FINEOUTgfineout@MiamiHerald.comTALLAHASSEE - A push by Common Cause and former Florida politicians to take the power of redistricting out of the hands of the Legislature was knocked off the November ballot by the Florida Supreme Court today.

The court ruled 6-1 that a proposed constitutional amendment to create an indepedent commission to draw districts for the Legislature and for Congress violate the state's single-subject requirements for citizen sponsored initiatives and would mislead voters. Justice
Harry Lee Anstead was the lone justice to oppose the ruling.

''We had hoped that the people of Florida would have an opportunity to speak on this question, whether they want self-interested politicians drawing their own districts,'' said Ben Wilcox, executive director of Common Cause of Florida and chairman of the Committee for Fair Elections.

Wilcox said his group may try to revamp its amendment and gather the 600,000-plus signatures to place it back on the ballot by 2008.

more: http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/14169612.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is bs
they broke this issue down into three amendments because of the single issue problem. IMHO there was no problem with the three. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Apperently the SC also held that the amendment was misleading
In a 6-1 ruling, the justices ruled the amendment would have misled voters into believing they were supporting a ''nonpartisan'' plan.

<snip>

Echoing the opponents of the plan, the Supreme Court noted that 12 of the 15 redistricting commissioners would have been appointed by partisans -- the governor, the House speaker and the Senate president -- and therefore would have been partisan.

more: http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/14173426.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC