Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missing wall key to Alma mine accident that killed two

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:24 PM
Original message
Missing wall key to Alma mine accident that killed two
Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 01:25 PM by RamboLiberal
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06082/675154.stm

MELVILLE, W.Va. -- Mine safety officials investigating a fire that killed two men inside the Aracoma Coal Co.'s Alma No. 1 mine believe a crucial section of wall that separates a coal conveyor belt from an air intake was not in place as required at the time of the blaze.

The conveyor belt ignited on the morning of Jan. 19, pouring smoke through the gaps in the wall and into the fresh air passageway that the miners were supposed to use for their escape, obscuring their vision and ultimately leading to the death of two of them.

"It seems like there were some blatant things wrong," said one mine safety official who, along with two others, spoke to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on the condition of anonymity. "It's going to turn out that these guys ultimately couldn't escape for that reason -- there were stoppings out that should have been in place."

If they'd been in place, the wall sections would have prevented any exchange of air between the conveyor belt and the fresh air intake, the primary source of air for workers inside the mine. Instead, investigators now believe, smoke flooded into the air intake, which also serves as an escape route, disorienting two of the miners, who became lost and died in the fire.

<snip>

According to the MSHA Web site, the Aracoma mine has been cited for 172 violations since the Jan. 19 fire, 115 of them considered "significant and substantial." That compares with 105 violations for all of 2005 and the days leading up to the Jan. 19 fire. Only 54 of those were considered "significant."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Only" 54 considered significant?
Only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC