Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby Defense May Highlight Infighting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:20 AM
Original message
Libby Defense May Highlight Infighting
Libby Defense May Highlight Infighting

By PETE YOST
The Associated Press
Saturday, March 18, 2006; 10:26 AM

WASHINGTON -- Lawyers for Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide are suggesting they may delve deeply at his criminal trial into infighting among the White House, the CIA and the State Department over pre-Iraq war intelligence failures.

New legal documents raise the potential that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's trial could turn into a political embarrassment for the Bush administration by focusing on whether the White House manipulated intelligence to justify the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

In a court filing late Friday night, Libby's legal team said that in June and July 2003, the status of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame was at most a peripheral issue to "the finger-pointing that went on within the executive branch about who was to blame" for the failure to find weapons of mass destruction.

"If the jury learns this background information" about finger-pointing, "and also understands Mr. Libby's additional focus on urgent national security matters, the jury will more easily appreciate how Mr. Libby may have forgotten or misremembered ... snippets of conversation" about Plame's status, the defense lawyers said.
(snip/...)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/18/AR2006031800587.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. this only points the finger more at Cheney, IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. It actually sounds like they are sending a message to Rove.
KNR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. it's no wonder
they came up with a photo-op called Operation Swarmer. The Libby defense team coming from one direction and a squealing Abramoff coming from the other one. All that on top of the Katrina tapes and the port deal disclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. LIbby's lawyers sure like to talk, don't they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GardeningGal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Libby Trial May Be Embarrassment for Bush
WASHINGTON - Lawyers for Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide are signaling they may delve deeply at his criminal trial into infighting among the White House, the CIA and the State Department over pre-Iraq war intelligence failures.

In a prelude to a possible defense, the lawyers for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby also are suggesting that the State Department — not Libby — may be to blame for leaking the identity of covert CIA officer Valerie Plame to the media.

Court papers filed late Friday raise the possibility a trial could become politically embarrassing for the Bush administration by focusing on the debate about whether the White House manipulated intelligence to justify the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cia_leak;_ylt=AtL_FyZtFxG89FEnuC3YeK6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Implicating the State Dept...
hmm..wasn't it Colin Powell back then..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. well, em =BARE-ASS away,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Bush Embarrasses Himself Everyday
and until recently, nobody cared. Incompetent, Idiot, Liar....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. neo-cons versus the establishment - ohh sounds like fun n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Let's remember..just where John Bolton worked at the time. Eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I've always thought that vindictive little creep was involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Libby's lawyers are trying to throw a little scare into the bush** admin.
as a warning that they better get their boy outta trouble or he might do some talking 'bout things they don't want talked about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. all these articles keep yapping about who leaked what
as if Libby is on trial for leaking, when of course he is not.

How does the state department leaking defend Libby for lying? I'm way past sick and tired of all the propaganda and water-muddying going on.

That being said, anything that embarrasses Bush is ok by me. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. You are correct, of course.
Frustrating in a way, but also fascinating to watch unfold.

It seems clear from the language of the Libby indictment that the OSC believes Libby is the original leaker. They claim he leaked the Plame/Wilson info to Judith Miller two weeks before "Offical A" (Rove?) leaked it to Novak. So presumably, Fitzgerald is holding some cards he hasn't played yet, for what purpose we can only speculate, which I am happy to do:

Although Libby was technically the first to leak the classified information (and then lied about it), someone else put him up to it, and that person might have been asking others (in the State Department?) to leak it too. Fitz may be looking for a few more bricks for the foundation he is building for a bigger case. After all, a criminal prosecution of the Vice President is profound!

And who knows, it may also be possible that he will delay any further prosecutions until his target (and his boss) is out of office, giving the case a better chance of being meaningful.

Another possibility is that some in the State Department really was the first to leak, and Fitz is playing his cards very close to the vest in order to draw that info out.


I'd be willing to bet that Fitz is perfectly willing to let the various protagonists have these semi-public arguments in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. my thoughts exactly
the charges are perjury and obstruction (at this point)so what does "who did the leaking" have to do with the current charges?

ennywhoo - it does present more questions -- did Libby lie to protect himself from being fingered as the leaker, or did he lie to protect others -- or both?

it's not inconceivable that there's more than one leaker

also not inconceivable that some of the leakers may have been unaware of Plame's security status -- consider this:

Leaker-One knows about Plame and CIA status. Leaker-One tells Leaker-Two about Plame working for CIA and being married to Wilson but does mention security status. Leaker-Two, unaware of security status, tells Leaker-Three and reporter(s)...Leaker-Three, Four... does the same



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. May???
I imagine it's a certainty that this will embarrass Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Embarassment Is Too Good For Bush
He deserves life in jail and stripping of assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. won't happen. he'll grab his crayola and pardon him first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. no one's ratted on Cheney and lived, yet

I suspect Libby will get Whittingtoned.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. hell of a way of giving people a warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Candidate for this month's "You Call This NEWS?" award
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 05:51 PM by rocknation
Court papers filed late Friday raise the possibility a trial could become politically embarrassing for the Bush administration by focusing on the debate about whether the White House manipulated intelligence to justify the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

The nerve of those investigators--don't they know how terribly unfair they're being to Georgie? It isn't as though the leak was done for HIS benefit!

:eyes:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Looks like Team Libby has resolved internal disputes...
..about whether they actually defend their client or protect the administration. Things could get very interesting!

Ol' Scooter has finally realized that his buds aren't gonna extend a helping hand...they're all too busy shredding stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. AP's potential witness list:
http://asia.news.yahoo.com/060318/ap/d8ge6c603.html

Potential witnesses in the upcoming criminal trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, as referenced in court papers by Libby's lawyers. The trial is scheduled for January:

_Richard Armitage, former deputy secretary of state.

_Ari Fleischer, former White House press secretary.

_Marc Grossman, former undersecretary of state for political affairs.

_Colin Powell, the former secretary of state.

_Karl Rove, the deputy White House chief of staff. ADVERTISEMENT

_George Tenet, the former CIA director.

_Joseph Wilson, a former U.S. ambassador.

_Valerie Plame Wilson.

more:http://asia.news.yahoo.com/060318/ap/d8ge6c603.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! This trial is NOT about WMDs!!!
It's about Libby's lying and obstructing justice!!!! What a tactic by the defense to divert attention away from the REAL crime Libby is being accused of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOP Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Be a man Scooter..........
come clean, don't protect them, let us know what's really going on in this administration. You owe it to this country. We know some of it but not all of it. They're not going to protect you anymore. They're not your friends anymore. Do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. That's No Excuse
If he's looking for mitigating circumstances, he's going to have to do better than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC