Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: 'We Have a Port Security System That Is Full of Holes'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:14 PM
Original message
Pelosi: 'We Have a Port Security System That Is Full of Holes'
U.S. Newswire (press release)
Pelosi: 'We Have a Port Security System That Is Full of Holes'
3/2/2006

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=61778

To: National Desk

Contact: Brendan Daly or Jennifer Crider, 202-226-7616, both of the Office of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, Web: http://democraticleader.house.gov

WASHINGTON, March 2 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi spoke on the House floor today in support of allowing the House to consider legislation on the Dubai port deal. By a vote of 216-197, the Republican House rejected the opportunity to debate a measure that would require a 45-day investigation into the Bush Administration's backroom port deal with Dubai and require the House to vote on approval of the deal. Below are Pelosi's remarks:

"Mr. Speaker, yesterday marked the third anniversary of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Yet today, three years later, our country is not as safe as it should be. We have a port security system that is full of holes.

"The ports are our first line of defense in protecting our country. Yet the backroom port deal shines a bright light on the failure of the President and this Republican Congress to secure our ports.

"The biggest threat to our security is the fissile materials that are still out there, the nuclear materials of the post- Soviet Union world. They were formally weapons of the Soviet Union and now they are not secured adequately and available to terrorists.

"The single biggest threat is those weapons in a container coming into our country. I really can't understand why this Administration has refused to do what is necessary to protect our ports from that threat. And, it's not only our ports; when these containers come from overseas to our country, they are unloaded onto a truck, onto a train, drive right through your city, your town, perhaps past your home. So the danger goes well beyond our ports.

"Here at home, only 6 percent of containers entering our ports are screened. Yet at two of the busiest terminals in the world - - in Hong Kong -- 100 percent of containers are screened. If Hong Kong terminals can do it, why can't America?

"That is why Democrats are proposing that 100 percent of the containers that comes to our ports are screened, at the port of origin -- long before they reach our shores and our waterways.

"Today, as we debate and vote on another issue of security, Democrats demand that attention be given to our ports. We will call for a vote on a bipartisan bill that is identical to the one introduced by the senior Republican and Democrat on the Homeland Security Committee, Mr. King and Mr. Thompson. It will require a 45-day investigation of the Dubai deal. In addition, we require both Houses of Congress to have an up or down vote on whether or not to approve this agreement.

"Congress must assert itself. Congress must take responsibility. We take an oath of office to protect the American people and we take that oath seriously.

"Today is the day that the Dubai deal will be finalized, and this is our best chance to require a congressional vote on whether or not that backroom deal should go through. I urge my colleagues to assert Congress's responsibility to the American people, to assert Congress's role in checks and balances in our Constitution. I urge our colleagues to vote against the previous question."

http://www.usnewswire.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC