Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRW: Trial of Former Afghan Intelligence Chief Flawed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:35 PM
Original message
HRW: Trial of Former Afghan Intelligence Chief Flawed
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HRW/eae779f103c393de92335fc6d06be600.htm

New York, March 2, 2006) – The trial of Assadullah Sarwari, who was sentenced to death on Sunday for his role in heading Afghanistan's brutal intelligence agency during the Communist government of the late 1970s, violated basic fair trial and due process standards, Human Rights Watch said today. Sarwari was convicted by a special National Security tribunal and has the right to appeal his sentence within 20 days. Human Rights Watch said that the case highlights the need for urgent judicial reform in Afghanistan and the establishment of a proper system of accountability for all those who committed human rights abuses over the past 25 years.

"A notorious human rights abuser has been convicted but his trial was so flawed that it actually represents a setback for the cause of justice in Afghanistan," said Sam Zarifi, research director of Human Rights Watch's Asia division. "The court of appeals should throw out this conviction and show that in today's Afghanistan, the rule of law applies, even to the most notorious former leaders."

Sarwari did not have legal counsel at his trial because he could not afford a lawyer and the court could not find any lawyers willing to represent him. The trial was summary in nature, taking only one day for the prosecution and defense to present their cases. Because the proceedings were conducted so quickly, Sarwari did not have adequate time to question witnesses or challenge the evidence against him. While Sarwari challenged the authenticity of a document he allegedly signed ordering illegal executions, no evidence was offered to show it was authentic and the court turned down his request for a forensic test. The National Security Court that conducted the trial is a special branch established by the Supreme Court, but its exact mandate and procedures are unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC