Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Democratic) Senators Voice Concern Over Ports Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:05 PM
Original message
(Democratic) Senators Voice Concern Over Ports Deal
WASHINGTON - Two Senate Armed Services Committee Democrats lashed out Thursday at permitting a state-owned company in the United Arab Emirates to take over half a dozen major U.S. seaports, suggesting that it could open a window of opportunity for a terrorist attack.

Brushing aside President Bush's assurances that security concerns have been addressed by his administration, Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record) of Michigan, the panel's ranking Democrat, said the UAE backed the Taliban and allowed financial support for al-Qaida.

Levin also charged that the UAE has an "uneven history" as "one of only a handful of countries in the world to recognize the Taliban regime in Afghanistan." He added that millions of dollars in al-Qaida funds went through UAE financial institutions.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., also was critical, calling the approval process "a failure of judgment" because officials "did not alert the president, the secretary of the treasury and the secretary of defense" that several of our critical ports would be turned over to a foreign country.

Earlier Thursday, Bush sought to calm the uproar over the ports deal, saying "people don't need to worry about security."

AP via Yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democratic Senators and Congressmen should be in an Up Roar
not just voicing concern.
This is the one topic they can gain the ear of a vast majority of Americans.

They can finally be tough on Security while pointing out that bu$h and the republican congress has failed miserable.

Why do I say the republican congress has failed?, they have been a rubber stamp all along and this deal slipped past them as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some copy editor wrote that headline
"in an uproar" characterizes their reaction just as well, if not better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Watching the hearings
is like watching a car accident, gruesome but you can't look away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. yes, i watched also:--but this was the WH briefing to Congress --not a
'hearing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. AP -Senator Challenges Ports Deal Procedure (should be plural!!)




http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060223/ap_on_go_co/ports_security&printer=1;_ylt=AohH2BSBYit2e57ABrCxGvmMwfIE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-
Senator Challenges Ports Deal Procedure

By TED BRIDIS, Associated Press Writer 16 minutes ago

The senior Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee angrily accused the Bush administration Thursday of ignoring the law by refusing to extend an investigation of a United Arab Emirates company's takeover of significant U.S. port operations.

(Bush comments omitted)

Clashing with a Treasury Department official on a mission to calm a political uproar, Sen. Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record) said the law has language specifically requiring a longer review than the one that an interagency committee conducted, if a business deal could affect national security.

"Is there not one agency in this government that believes this takeover could affect the national security of the United States?" the Michigan Democrat asked at a committee briefing. Chairman John Warner, R-Va., in a very unusual procedure on Capitol Hill, allowed reporters to question the administration witnesses.

The Treasury official, Deputy Secretary Robert Kimmitt, and officials from other agencies said a multiagency group spent three months reviewing the port deal and said that all concerns about security were satisfied.
.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. If you want the law changed, come to Congress and change it but don't igno


.....Levin insisted that the law that established the multiagency panel specifically said that any such review should be lengthened by 45 days if it could have an impact on national security.

Levin, raising his voice at the briefing, told Kimmitt, "If you want the law changed, come to Congress and change it but don't ignore it."

Kimmitt responded, "We didn't ignore the law. Concerns were raised. They were resolved."

Warner then jumped in to assure Levin that he would ask Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to prepare a memorandum on the administration's interpretation of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only Repug to show up was Warner (Chair)--and he took WH position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. nominate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC