Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers say security worries impaired Libby's memory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:36 AM
Original message
Lawyers say security worries impaired Libby's memory

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060223/REPOSITORY/602230330/1013/NEWS03

Lawyers say security worries impaired Libby's memory
They argue details of CIA leak forgotten


By CAROL D. LEONNIG
The Washington Post

Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff was so consumed with pressing national security concerns in 2003 and 2004 that he undoubtedly forgot details of conversations he had about undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame, his defense lawyers argue in new court filings.

Attorneys for I. Lewis "Scooter"Libby insist they need hundreds of pages of classified daily briefings prepared for President Bush to show that Libby did not intentionally lie about discussing Plame with reporters, as prosecutors allege. They contend that he was preoccupied with more serious matters when the conversations took place and when investigators questioned him months later.

Libby, 55, faces charges of committing perjury, making false statements and obstructing justice in the investigation of whether administration officials broke the law by disclosing Plame's identity to the media.

"One of the central themes of Mr. Libby's defense at trial will be that any misstatements he made during his FBI interviews or grand jury testimony were not intentional, but rather the result of confusion, mistake or faulty memory,"the attorneys wrote in a court document filed late Tuesday. "Given the urgent national security issues that commanded Mr. Libby's attention, it is understandable that he may have forgotten or misremembered relatively less significant events (such as) alleged snippets of conversations about Valerie Plame Wilson's employment status."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. AH HA HA HA HA HA HA!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:



I see this as a Jeopardy category in the near future:


"Uh, yes, I'll take 'Lamest Damn Excuses in History' for $1000, Alex"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twaddler01 Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. That was my first response
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. this was his story a few days after he was indited--if he repeats it often
enough people will believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just shorten that headline to.... "Libby impaired Security"
Keep it simple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. he should have taken some Focus Factor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. if they keep downplaying her "employment status", they're sunk
the average joe and jury member knows damn well that whether or not someone is an UNDERCOVER SPY is not at all a trivial matter and if libby was in fact focused on national security, he would damn well remember that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry, Scooter ....
Mr. Fitzgerald will be able to document for the jury the extensive amount of time and energy you invested in the effort to discredit Wilson and expose Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Security worries for him and his buddies? Worried that we would find out
that they have been illegally spying on us? Stealing from us? Certainly Libby's worries could not be about the ordinary folks that actually keep America moving along. If I was on that jury I would not be accepting that premise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. had to check link, make sure it wasn't from The Onion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ridiculous! Ludicrous, even...
Most definitely one of the lamest excuses eve. Who in their right mind would believe that Libby didn't review his own notes & call records before he went and spoke to the FBI and Grand Jury?


Oppsss.... sorry, I forgot... most of "middle america" doesn't think, they just accept whatever they see in print as the gospel Truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Good point.
More, while it is possible, in theory, for any person to forget things, it is not possible for people to remember things that never happened. Early in the investigation of the leak, before Fitzgerald was brought in, and at a time when the WHIG thought there was no threat posed by the DoJ's questions, Libby "remembered" a conversation with Russert that never happened. And he told the FBI investigators a detailed story about that conversation. Later, he would testify under oath to the grand jury about this conversation that never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. This is rich!
I had completely forgotten about the concocted Russert conversation. Thank for the reminder... I'd wished I had this info on the tip of my tongue when I was having a heated e-mail exchange with someone last week about the "I was so busy that I merely forgot" defense. Hmmm... do I really want to restart that conversation with this little gem? Pondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Twinkie Defense
Don't blame me; it's....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Haha...nice try. If this were true, then it could be argued Libby was
was not to be trusted to handle classified materials properly. If he "misremembered" got "confused" or had a "faulty memory" about sensitive classified material and accidentally leaked it because of this, it indicates incompetency.

Hope that made sense...I haven't had enough coffee yet this morning to write clear sentences.

:hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. what a friggin joke these repukes are, now getting what they deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. I tried doing that....
Trying to forget the names of my co-workers in case I was captured.....had to stop when I began forgetting my own name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. Security caused lack of security?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Scooter's a busy guy!
He can't remember each and every felony he committed, there were so gosh darn many. I'll bet you don't remember every beat your heart pumped in 2003 either, do you, you bunch of smarty-pantses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. 10 to 25 year in prison
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 10:15 AM by 4dsc
would also impair his memory!! LMAO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. But your honor, Rush said anthrax and I forgot that I couldn't take a gun
into the bank - I swear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. Wow. The bullshit comes full circle.
He was so busy creating pressing national security concerns that he forgot about conversations that he had that created pressing national security concerns.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Please! Worry of spending his life in prison with a name like "Scooter"
...is what "impaired" his memory.

Of course if he is convicted, he'd end up in a "Camp Cupcake"-type prison, so he wuldn't be "roughed up"...much.

Lucky for "Scooter" he has lots of rich friends who are stepping-up to pay for his Defense. Isn't nice how predictably un-imprisonable they usually are. And now with the courts more "stacked"...this will happen even more, no dobut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
23. Incompetence is no defense nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buford Pusser Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. The GOP evidently digs "frivolous" litigation. Laughable defense. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC