Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exclusive: Senator says Frist will try to bring federal gay marriage ban..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:44 PM
Original message
Exclusive: Senator says Frist will try to bring federal gay marriage ban..
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 01:03 PM by samhsarah
Exclusive: Senator says Frist will try to bring federal gay
marriage ban to vote; Eyed for 06 elections: Developing...

From Raw Story. No link to full article yet....Still developing....http://www.rawstory.com/

UPDATE: Republicans will try to bring Federal Marriage Amendment to a vote in 2006

Melissa McEwan

A Republican effort to ban gay marriage nationwide will be returned to the Senate floor in 2006, RAW STORY has learned.

The Marriage Protection Amendment was originally introduced by Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO) in 2003, and leveraged as a wedge issue by the GOP during the 2004 election cycle as a way of mobilizing its base to vote against same-sex marriage.

Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO), a co-sponsor of the 2005 joint resolution, has confirmed that Senate Majority leader Bill Frist (R- TN) will attempt to bring the controversial legislation to the floor this year for a full vote.

"Senator Bill Frist has indicated he will try to bring the Marriage Protection Amendment to a full vote again this year," Allard spokeswoman Angela de Rocha told RAW STORY. "Senator Allard believes that a constitutional amendment is the best way to make it crystal clear that marriage is between a man and a woman."

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Republicans_will_try_to_bring_Federal_0127.html

Guns, Gawd, and Gays - The GoOP MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure SC Justice Alito will have no problem with it
We need to keep fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. What exactly would Alito have to say about it anyway?
How is he relevant here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. That's the problem
If the Repkues get it into the Constitution as an amendment, even SCOTUS can't do anything about it. The good news (apart from my saving a ton of money on my car insurance...)is that the founders made it VERY difficult to amend the Constitution. And a long process. Of course, Prohibition proves it can be done, and for a stupid cause. But it's not gonna happen overnight.

Still, we need to start fighting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oooohhhh, diversion, diversion...
... like no one will notice that Frist the cat-cadaver-lover is trying to evade his role as a shill for his family's company and his stock shenanigans with same. Not.

Indictments soon. Film at 11. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Yeah, you're correct on that one.
Quick! Get me a wedge issue! Yeah, gay marriage! That's the ticket!.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. seems to me the Dems should fight this cat-killer with
a state's-rights argument.

How can the Repugs argue with that??? Aren't they supposed to be states-rights champions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. By applying logic to a Republican issue, you are being very
unfair to them. They can't deal with it on that level. It puts the brakes on their spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigjohn16 Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Do you support a states right to ban gay marriage? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I do not think they (the repugs) should be able to
legislate their morality at a federal level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigjohn16 Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But the Republicans at the state level should?
We'd have a very different country if we allowed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Once Roe is overturned what's to stop them from a ban on all abortions?
They could do that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. If this happens, I will stop paying taxes to this joke of a government.
Taxation without representation.

If they want to make me a non-entity, then I'll keep my $10K+ a year in taxes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Copperred Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. ....


An organized methodical tax revolt in general would be a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well how fabulous
he must have received the following email too and thought it was a call to action:

10 Reasons Why Gay Marriage is Wrong

1. Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject
unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.
2. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way
that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
3. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of
crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a
dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
4. Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't
changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry
whites, and divorce is still illegal.
5. Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage
were allowed; the sanctity of Britney Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun
marriage would be destroyed.
6. Straight marriages are valid because they produce children.
Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed
to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs
more children.
7. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight
parents only raise straight children.
8. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy
like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire
country. That's why we have only one religion in America.
9. Children can never succeed without a male and a female role
model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single
parents to raise children.
10. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could
never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to
cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

* Re-post this if you believe love makes a marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. that's great
thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ah hahahahahah! Number 7 cracks me up!
7. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight
parents only raise straight children.


Don't forget that forbidding gay marriage also means that many liberals will not be allowed to marry, as there is no such thing as a gay Republican. Just ask Ken Mehlman. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ally McLesbian Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. hmmm...
what about those faggots, like Jeff Gannon and Mann Coulter?

I fully support beheading these scums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Ugh.
"Faggots"? Where did that come from?

Anyway, Ann Coulter is a banshee, but she's straight. She is quite promiscuous, by her own accounts, though.

"Beheading"? Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ally McLesbian Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Well
Jeff Gannon = gay.

Ann Coulter = tranny.

nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. fabulous. simply fabulous. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. That's cool
Nice to have a nice left-wing email to spread around :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Guns, God, and gays - the GOP trifecta for winning elections...
Er, it's more like the GOP trifecta for scaring the shit out of the voting base, many of who are too stupid to realize what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, our dem "leadership" will probably point to a few ineffective
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 04:19 PM by VegasWolf
NO votes like they did with Alito and claim a moral victory. Yeah right! Time for a change! Alito changes everything about my perspective on this group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. ok, fine. now if only the democrats would be smart
and frame this for what it is, a CIVIL RIGHTS issue, we'd be laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. More diversion and division from the GOP
Just in time for the midterm elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. And how come frist isn't in jail yet for insider trading??
They whip martha in there in a heart beat but drag their asses on frist. Funny how that works.

so according to their bizarro logic, if it's 50k or under you go right to jail, but if it's over, it will take time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick and Nom #4, the NAZIS are at it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's not about getting the law passed...
... they just need a wedge issue to keep the drones in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nothing could be more important!
Soldiers dying in Iraq for want of armor? We'll get back to you on that.

Elections hijacked by rigged voting machines? Wadarya, some kinda conspiracy theorist?

Our alleged "President"** trashing the Constitution and breaking the law at will? He's just fulfilling his Oath of Office.

Multibillion $$$ octocorps plundering the economy wholesale, while paying less and less in taxes? That's the free market in action.

American jobs being outsourced to Asian sweatshops, while future American workers can't even afford a decent education? Globalization is the future, deal with it.

The basic fabric of society threatened by ... men kissing ?

---> GOLDEN GLOBE AWARD <--

NOT THAT!! LOOKY OVER THERE! It's O'Saddam, uh, Osama! 9/11! Everything's changed! You're witless or against us! Unitary Executive! I don't know either! You're helping the terrorists (assuming they like to watch men kissing)! More cowbell!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. MORALITY to them
only applies to SEX. Don't you get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Great post.
I wish I could nominate it for the front page. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Gee, it must be 2006....elections
More Gawd, Guns and Gays to bash the dems with amongst the idiot population
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Instant GOP voter turnout tool...
turn out the red staters otherwise disgusted with the Party's shenanigans of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. That's what it's all about... just like in '04. Foment fear and loathing.
They just ought to be ashamed... unscrupulous power-hunger at the expense of innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. I hope he does. It'll be his swan song.
The Rethugs are going down, and the gay-bashing will mobilize OUR base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is typical election year politics
I doubt they will get it through on a national level.

They are pushing a state ammendment here in Minnesota to try to influence the Senate and Governor races this fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. here we go again
the same religious right wingers indulging in nonsense while this country goes down the tubes. this is tres boring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. Oh yes, it's such a popular idea. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC