Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice says time for talking with Iran is over

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:06 PM
Original message
Rice says time for talking with Iran is over
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Monday there was strong international consensus against Iran's nuclear plans and time had run out for talking to Tehran.

With Italy's foreign minister at her side, Rice said the next step must be to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council. The United States believes Iran is building a nuclear bomb but Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful, energy purposes.

"The referral absolutely has to be made," Rice told reporters.

"Iran must know that there is a firm international consensus against the activities that Iran is currently engaged in. We would all like to solve this diplomatically and we are all committed to doing so but Iran must recognize the concerns of the international community and has not done so."

more: http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-01-23T190752Z_01_N23312815_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-RICE.xml&rpc=22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck you, Neocondi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umass1993 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. I second that.
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 04:15 PM by umass1993
Saying anything more is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. I third that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umass1993 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Can you imagine
putting together a letter like this:

Dear Sec. State Condoleeza Rice:

Fuck you! Beeeeotch.

Sincerely,
Everyone at DU


It would be great with thousands of signatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. I'll sign it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakeguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
59. ROFLMAO!
HA, all caps for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Oh, and they don't want to
try and be friends with Chavez because .."we just don't like him".

I'll sign that letter that says.."Fuck you, neocondi".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. the time has run out for this woman
playacting at Secretary of State.

The fact that it ever even got this far is related to this administration's political and diplomatic incompetence, and she who hold shit last smell strongest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Pull out the Nukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
75. war is almost here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't someone point this Idiot ...
... in the direction of the nearest shoe store? Spending thousands on Ferragamos is the ONLY thing she's suited for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone ever ask this warhawk piece of shit why...
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 03:10 PM by pinniped
she's got such a hard-on for Iran?

Anyone?

This is * diplomacy in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I heard it was because Iran is scheduled to convert
from dollars to euros in the sale of petrol in February or March of this year.

I gotta admit, I don't understand the whys, wherefores or pitfalls of this conversion of currency......but supposedly, Iraq also planned to convert from dollars to euros, and that's the real reason we invaded Iraq. Cheney making a boatload of money through Halliburton didn't hurt either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Yeah, Randi Rhodes talked about this awhile ago on her show.
She said that if Iraq was going to convert dollars to Euros, oil would cost MORE. That's the scoop on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. U.S. Bankers won't make money on dollar conversions
I think that's a good part of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
64. and iraq wanted to convert dollars to euros.
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 09:21 PM by orleans
lucky we bombed the shit out of them just in time.

think we'll blow up iran in time?

and on edit: in all seriousness i really believe that had a TON to do with why we went after iraq. it wasn't to free anybody. it was to free the dollar from being taken over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
47. It will keep the defense contractors working
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 05:16 PM by superconnected
The way they work is immediately build what ever company they need by hiring contractors to do the job. They get the bulk of the money for the job. Haliburtop, Bechtel and the Carlyle group have been doing this all along. They've been forming adn disolving companies like crazy as US contracts come up and get satified.

If we pull out of iraq do to public demand, they will need iran for the contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
72. Since the '30s, FDR/Saudis Oil has been paid for only in Dollars
This whole episode could result in $105 barrel oil

"A research report issued by Goldman Sachs, the biggest trader of energy derivatives, forecast that oil prices could range from $50 to $105 per barrel, due to thin spare capacity in the energy supply chain and long response times for bringing on supply additions."
http://www.news.ops.gov.ph/archives2005/apr20.htm

Global recession could result, due to one-third of world's GDP being US's $12 trillion vs. World GDP of around $36 trillion.

Iran doesn't really care about the rest of the world it seems; it just wants to take a swing at the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. Here's your answer...
Rove: It's the (eternal) war, stupid!

In his first speech in two months, "Bush's brain" laid out his plan for GOP victory: War, war and more war.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/01/21/rove/

:argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's a bad bad nasty piece of garbage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another Nut Case that Should Be Locked Up for Life!
Fucking sickos are starting WWIII!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Iran could reach Israel, Iraq, the green zone, Kuwait and elsewhere
(correct me if I am wrong) with their missiles, howcomes they haven't done so? I'm just sayin'. We as a nation have not been able to keep our noses out of ANYBODY's business since the beginning of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
86. Because they are not terrorists and they don't want war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. We've never talked DIRECTLY to them....as Clark says, "before
you bomb someone, you should at least talk to them..."

This reminds me of the N. Korea situation. Bushco comes in and stops all contacts with N. Korea, which Clinton had going.

A few years later, as China steps into the fray, we go skulking back and are now talking to N. Korea again.

So, why can't we talk to Iran? Oh, that's right...we need more chaos in the Middle East...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. Bush & Company entered his stolen pResidency threatening Iran,
and never opened the door to diplomacy. They went so far immediately real dialogue was almost impossible. They are too proud of their stolen power to lower themselves to communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Forney05 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Looks
like $100 dollar oil here we come! Way to go Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Welcome to the DU Blue_Forney05
:hi: and welcome to the DU!! :hi:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. deju va of 2003 all over again
Iraq and now Iran!!!!! :grr: :grr:

Find a new job Condosleezza!!

WE THE PEOPLE MUST STOP THIS MADNESS!!!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dream on, beeeeeotch!
As if Russia or China are going to vote to refer?


"Iran must know that there is a firm international consensus..."

The RW keeps harping on this piece of BULLSHIT, as well...nothing could be farther from the truth. Europe and China and Russia ALL want to negotiate a deal via the IAEA, Iran wants to renegotiate and the IAEA itself (ElBaradei) want to follow through and revisit the issue on March 3...

Only France and the US seem to have said ANYTHING about the UNSC referral...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Forney05 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Whats the old saying,
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it". Geez, after only 2 or 3 years and our "leaders" want to invade an even more powerful country? What are they smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh Joy.
More Fucking War.:woohoo:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think "I've seen this part of the show before." These thugs are crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here we go again
They sure use funny clocks up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. yeah lets just bomb the shit out them condi...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Isn't Rice supposed to be a diplomat?
Sounds like she is starting another War Dance for the admin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rice Says time for talking to Iran is over
cont'd at:

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-01-23T190752Z_01_N23312815_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-RICE.xml&rpc=22


Rice says time for talking with Iran is over
Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:08 PM ET

By Sue Pleming
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Monday there was strong international consensus against Iran's nuclear plans and time had run out for talking to Tehran.

With Italy's foreign minister at her side, Rice said the next step must be to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council. The United States believes Iran is building a nuclear bomb but Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful, energy purposes.

"The referral absolutely has to be made," Rice told reporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Oh holy fuck.
Goody; let's fight

THREE

wars!

It's not like the military's already stretched thin enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Gosh, I'm so amazed? More of the PNAC agenda being carried forward.
Imagine that?

Now who woulda thunk?

And, of course the MSM is mum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I say the time for tolerating Republicans is OVER.
We need to throw the bastards out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. hear! hear! indeed! way over due
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Oh, clearly.
Clearly, clearly, clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Last week called: it want's its news back...
(this is directed at condi, not the op)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. wow, what a great diplomat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. They are just waiting for the Alito appointment to be finalized

Then, Bush can declare war without Congressional authorization with no fear. He will own courts.

Watch.

IF Alito gets in...it is a death knell.

It is sooooooooo frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Has Lindsey Graham said during the hearing
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 04:10 PM by DoYouEverWonder
"And I hope you'll understand if any us come before a court and we can't remember Abramoff, you will tend to believe us."

Alito is their ace in the hole. They need him desperately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. I agree.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umass1993 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. WW III
This could be a first step towards World War III. Will the world stand by and watch us consolidate the oil resources in the Middle East?

Note that Saudi's signed a deal with China yesterday. They know that we would turn on them in second, and a good relationship with China would be a strong deterrent.

Russia and China have strong strategic interests in Iran. If we attempt to colonize Iran, will they watch, or will they act?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Start a pool now: How soon before the MSM starts beating the war drums?
Willing propagandists for the invasion of Iraq, how soon will CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN start in on Iran? (FOX is a foregone conclusion.) I remember being quite impressed with the special graphics, theme music, and slogans they all came up with in the months leading up to the invasion. Think they've learned ANYthing?

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
53. Cue ominous music: "Showdown with Iran"
Brought to you by these fine foods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #53
70. And by Hummer
And Applebee's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Name ONE LAW Iran is breaking. Name ONE SANCTION Iran is breaking.
Correct answer? NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. So, they gonna start the draft? Gonna snag a few of these keyboard
warriors?

They are going to have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. kick & recommend. n/t
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 04:24 PM by phusion
I echo the thought: What a diplomat!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. In other words "if they go ahead and switch from dollars to Euros, it's
bombs away"!


:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryxyouth Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. Don't worry, it will be a short war.
Shock and Aw strategy. Oil sales will pay for the whole reconstruction thing.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #42
87. My generation always figured WW III would be short. Very short.
:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke:

Hekate
who believe some Bushites are clinically insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
43. The beginning of the end
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 04:41 PM by realpolitik
We cannot prosecute this war with conventional forces.

When we withdraw our forces to frontal positions resembling Saddam's in the first war with Iran, the Shia fifth column action will create unacceptable losses and command structure havoc for our conventional troop.

There are a limited number of ways we could prosecute an Iranian adventure, and all of them require a WWI-WWII level of totalitarianism. I.E. there would be a total war effort from the economy. There will be full employment, and gas rationing...

Oh yes, did I mention that Iran will fight a forward front war too?

1. Iranian cells in non-aligned countries with scant export inspection will launch bio-attacks (you can't call it terrorism if it is a state-sponsored counter attack to a war they did not start) on major port cities/air hubs. Weaponized Anthrax, Smallpox, and probably Ebola will be dispersed on Airliners heading for America and Britain.

2. All western oil x-fer facilities in the gulf will be sabotaged simultaineously.

3. This will further radicalize the Sunni Wahabbists, and Saudi Arabia will fall to Islamists.

4. 5th column actions in the EU will further cleve our support.

5. Russia and China will not only offer weapons support, but will start funnelling deniable units of 'Lincoln Brigades' into Iran with sophisticated weapons like the hypersonic cruise missle. American air superiority will melt under the collective strain of massive theater operations.

6. Then we use nukes, probably tactically, as if that *means* anything. Because once that happens, a second Cuban Missle Embargo will occur, with us in the role of the Soviets.

7. Then we either start Armageddon, or admit defeat. And I mean crushing, Versailles treaty kinda defeat. Wherein we face economic sanctions for a decade or so.


8. And then Caligula's propaganda minster will start the anti liberal pogroms aka the final solution to the liberal traitors who cost us the war... And most of us will end our lives in a camp in Texas or Oklahoma.

But if we manage to survive that, we will spend the rest of the century hunting down every neo-con bastard, and hanging them with piano wire from light poles.

Just a cheery thought, brought to you by someone who has paid attention to the 20th Century.


PS-- this will not happen without a draft. And frankly, despite the announcement of the SOTU topic, ** will probably 'divert' the topic to the 'impending emergency.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umass1993 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Great Post.
You've read history books. Normal people don't use the term "forward front war."

I wonder how much the Islamic warriors have learned from the North Vietnamese war strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Let me put it this way...
Yes, I have read quite a lot of 20th C history.

I also spent a lot of evenings talking to a miltary historian who wrote a couple of the histories the Army War College uses. When you war game with these boys, you better get good.

I was a co-founder of what is arguably the most successful army in the SCA.

I think the Islamists will go straight to the Tet offensive, skipping the prelude, or rather, they have already politicized the populace by letting us willy pete and Abu Ghraib the locals, and they have a complete playbook on how to destroy 21st century economies using the vital materiels and paradigms of 21st century economy.

The uprising that will occur when we start striking air defenses in Iran will make the Mau Mau look like an ice cream social. In the midst of that, we will supposedly be running the logistics for fighting Iran, who is decidedly *not* a paper tiger.

This has SNAFU written all over it in letters larger than the 20th Century Fox logo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. Thanks for the insight
This obviously is madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. If the PNAC controlled
government starts WWIII, may awful, painful fates befall the lot of them. They will deserve no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. Complete this sentence: Condi Rice is to International Diplomacy as...
...Charles Manson is to _______________.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Your neighborhood block party.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
50. Key point: no way China is gonna let us cut off their oil for no reason
Empty talk from Condi. Iran is a case in point of the real new world order, which has as part of the picture a weakened, no-credibility, distrusted, hated pariah (us), with an economically strong Europe and ever-rising China to be reckoned with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. We don't have the ability to go after Iran.
What army would we use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
76. Ditto Russia.
Referring this to the UN Security Council is a joke. They're going to do whatever the hell they want anyway regardless of the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why Should We Believe Condolezza "Mushroom Cloud" Rice?
She said Iraq had nukes. Not even close. Not even "nuclear-weapons-related-programs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
66. those words you said...mushroom ... and rice....
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 09:26 PM by orleans
seem to go very nicely together



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
57. tic-toc
I almost hope the US does get into a pissing match with Iran. It'll end up being the straw that broke the US camel's back- and at this point, that's exactly what America needs. Better sooner than later, while there's still the opportunity to maybe oust the far right lunatics and start putting responsible policies in place for the future.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. Bomb first, talk later.
It is the itchy-trigger-finger syndrome. War-mongering assholes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u4ic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
62. Did they ever START talking?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
67. The Whore busily lies us into another nonsense war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
68. Well, that was quick!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
69. Some real diplomacy there ho
I hope the adults take over soon!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
71. Kick and Nom #6 for WWIII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
73. Rice; "I believe the PDB said, UBL determined to strike within the US.
using aircraft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
74. Oil companies will love this - watch those gas prices go up as Bush says
he's doing it to protect us - this is turning into our worst nightmare with this administration.
They don't know what the fuck they're or do they? -- Our prices go up as Condi sjops for shoes and Cheney shops for estates as Halliburton laughs their asses off, the US. people are being made fools of!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
77. who is she trying to fool? they've already LOST this fight!
and she bloody well knows it too, why are they pretending this is still ongoing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
78. Rice says time for talking with Iran is over
or it will be by March.

Geez, could we be any more transparent Condisleeza?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
79. Someone should make a comparison of rethoric used now
and rethoric used before attacking Iraq.

I did this in my blog in Norway, but don't have any links to articles in English.

The methods are identical; first escalate the rethoric, then refer to the UN to give it a sheen of legality, and then...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
80. Yep, that thar's the "diplomatic" approach
Talk is cheap, but it takes cruise missiles to keep the "defense" industry humming along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
81. The THUGS won't give up will they? No matter the cost!
This has become THE NIGHTMARE....that....NEVER ENDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
82. Ready the War Drums, Fire up the Fox News Machine, Condi smells blood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
83. I still say let the Israelis take out their nuclear program
They are the ones most directly threatened by it. They also are really good at this type of operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. This is about the Oil Bourse, not the nonexistent nuclear weapons.
The Likud/AIPAC bunch wants the invasion to start soon
but they have no intention of doing their own dirty work.
Not with a fool like Bush in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
84. I think Condyloma needs to go shoe-shopping. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
88. Time for listening to Rice is over. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC