Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IAEA chief: no broad Iran report for February meeting (refuses US request)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:03 PM
Original message
IAEA chief: no broad Iran report for February meeting (refuses US request)
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-01-23T173039Z_01_L23122543_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-IAEA.xml

VIENNA (Reuters) - The International Atomic Energy Agency chief on Monday refused EU and U.S. requests for a broad report on Iran's disputed atomic work in time for a February 2 IAEA crisis meeting, saying he needed more time to prepare one.

Mohamed ElBaradei's response, whose text was obtained by Reuters, said he had given Iran until a regularly scheduled March 6 board session to answer questions about its nuclear program, which the West suspects aims to make nuclear bombs.

"Due process, therefore, must take its course before (we) are able to submit a detailed report," ElBaradei wrote.

Western leaders want a broad accounting of Iran's activities for the February 2 meeting to help them persuade skeptical Russia, China and developing states on the 35-nation board to agree to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions.

After ElBaradei turned down verbal requests from European Union powers and Washington to move up a full report, the U.S., British, French as well as Australian ambassadors to the IAEA pressed their case in letters sent to him at the weekend.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. El Baradei's been down this road before
fortunately it looks like he won't be fooled twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. HAHAHAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can hear bolton's hissy fit already....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Due process? Evidence?
Doesn't El Baradei know that the rule of law for the corrupt Bush administration is "verdict first, then trial"? Unless, of course, we're talking about GOP malfeasance, in which case you can't even call a GOP convict a felon because it might upset his little girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Saddam gave a 12,000 page report which the Bushbots dismissed
out of hand. In Saddams report was all kinds of info giving evidence of no WMDs or the destruction of WMDs. Instead of using that report to avert conflict, the Bushbots censored 8,000 pages and dismissed the rest as propaganda. So who thinks a report from Iran would make any difference? Have people forgotten recent history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC