Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy resolution demands Bush wiretap probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:40 PM
Original message
Kennedy resolution demands Bush wiretap probe
Article Launched: 01/21/2006 06:39:21 AM

By EVAN LEHMANN, Sun Washington Bureau


WASHINGTON -- ... Kennedy's resolution rejects the administration's claim that a congressional resolution passed days after Sept. 11 attacks, authorizing the use of military force against terrorists inherently permits the White House to listen in on American phone conversations without a warrant ...

Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee and a cosponsor of the resolution said: "Spying on Americans without first obtaining the requisite warrants is illegal, unnecessary and wrong. No president can simply declare when he wishes to follow the law and when he chooses not to."

Kennedy said the "exclusive" authority to wiretap American phones is possessed by secret courts created under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Those courts can issue warrants for domestic wiretaps ...

Kennedy's non-binding resolution could not force an end to the program. But Leahy said it would "set the record straight." ...

http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_3424691



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about an impeachment resolution in the House?
Pelosi, where are you??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be intersting to see if any of our "leadership" has ANY balls to
actually do such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Correct me if I'm wrong
But Articles of Impeachment have to come from the Judiciary Committee, and they can't even hold a meeting unless this pig Sensenbrenner calls it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't know, but Republicans were certainly calling for an impeachment
of Clinton very loudly in the public media long before a formal resolution was introduced. Publicity and offense, two things that unsettle the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. But Kennedy's bill "makes the case." n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cheney says it is NOT a domestic surveillance program.


....Cheney omitted any mention of the 2001 resolution authorizing force as a justification for the program in comments yesterday. Instead, Cheney emphasized that he and the president have "all the authority we need" under Article II of the Constitution. He also said "previous actions of the Congress" justify the program.

"This is not a domestic surveillance program, as it's been referred to frequently by the press or some of our critics," Cheney said, according to a White House transcript. "At least one end of the communications involve al Qaeda and a connection outside the U.S."

Kennedy's non-binding resolution could not force an end to the program. But Leahy said it would "set the record straight."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Let's hear Cheney said that under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. yeah, it's a government surveillance program
targeting US civilians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go for it Ted...
let's turn up the heat and shed light on all these gop coackroaches hiding under their protective rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. I admire the Senator for working to keep the issue in focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good old Ted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. A long time ago, all Democrats were like Ted Kennedy
except for the Southern segregationists. Democrats had the White House and both houses of Congress. Today, there are only a handful of Democrats like Ted Kennedy. Democrats do not have the White House or Congress. Most of today's Democrats sound and act more like Republicans used to before the Christian Jihadist takeover of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. there SHOULD be a CHORUS of democrat voices calling for this stuff
every damn day too, and calls for impeachment. resolutions introduced every day, press conferences, speeches...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. This should intensify the Alito debate. I do not want Alito on the court
that decides this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. It will pass like b*** will resign after the state of the union speech;
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good for Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Letitbeme Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush's Unauthorized Wiretaps is An Impeachable Offense!
Bush's Illegal, Unauthorized, Wiretaps of Free Innocent American Citizens is certainly without any doubt whatsoever a Highly Impeachable Offense!
Call your Congressmen and get the Process started, once it's started, the evidence will flow in like a stream of water!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. The wiretaps are also a felony, punishable by up to 5 years in jail.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. keep it front and center
Do not let this regime get away with this impeachable offense. bu$h broke the law!!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Currently Bush is investigating himself on this one...(Gonzalez)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Oh, be still, my heart!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC