Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Future charges possible, Dems warn White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:10 PM
Original message
Future charges possible, Dems warn White House
Statute of limitations extends past 2008, congressman says

Washington -- House Democrats warned President Bush, top leaders of his administration and officials of the National Security Agency on Friday that if the political climate changes they could face criminal prosecution for ordering and carrying out warrantless domestic eavesdropping.

"These are clearly crimes and the statute of limitations extends beyond this president's term,'' which will end in January 2009, said Rep. Jerry Nadler D-N.Y., at an ad hoc hearing called by House Judiciary Committee's Democrats to assail Bush's contention that his order for warrantless domestic wiretaps on American citizens is legal.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/01/21/MNGNEGQPIR1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hear, hear!! I second that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for Nadler.
I'm tired of Bush committing crimes against the People of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. The Iraq War Joint resolution was unconstitutional !
and Gore's case against Bush, as WaPost's David Broder shows, is clear "...Gore has done a service by laying out the case as clearly and copiously as he has done. His overall charge is that Bush has systematically broken the laws and bent the Constitution by his actions in the areas of national security and domestic anti-terrorism."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/18/AR2006011801874.html

The War Powers Act of 1973 is what limits the imperial president's powers, but as yet, despite being embedded within the 'Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq'

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2382761&mesg_id=2382761

The fact is that Congress vested Bush with powers 'as he determines' unconstitutionally, since the War Powers Act of 1973 shows that the facts of the US involvment must be clear and the circumstances and situations prompting the measure must by face value be TRUTHFUL !

In the case of the resolution, Congress allows Bush to determine what is truthful, 'as he determines', not passing the common law's "rational man" test !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Congress should have known better than to assume * would be truthful
"The fact is that Congress vested Bush with powers 'as he determines' unconstitutionally, since the War Powers Act of 1973 shows that the facts of the US involvment must be clear and the circumstances and situations prompting the measure must by face value be TRUTHFUL !

In the case of the resolution, Congress allows Bush to determine what is truthful, 'as he determines', not passing the common law's "rational man" test ! "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. The truth is out there...
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is in prison

Henry David Thoreau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. Yeah, Mulder know's what he's talking about
He'll unveil these crooks what they are if it takes him several beyond series movies to do so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
58. very little passes the "rational man" test ! " in the bushie team
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
63. Should have? They DID.
I STILL don't forgive those who voted for this war crime. Never will, unless they become truly repentant and do something to make up for it.

Then I MIGHT consider forgiving them for failing in their basic duty of representing their constituents, the majority of whom did not want this war at any point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, great! Let's take back the gov't in this year's elections, and
crucify the anti-American bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_MUST_Go Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What good is this "threat" IF the neocons are still counting the votes? em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. ... and if "the loyal opposition" won't question the fraudulent results n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. THIS time, if the votes are close, we had better be ready with our legal
international observers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. Hi BMG & welcome...........
The good news is that when ALL ('06 elections) house seats are up for grabs, vote count fraud will be a very hard to pull off (I hope).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Nope. Vote count fraud is VERY easy to pull off....just a few keystrokes.
This issue is very deep, very hackable, and very serious. There are no good-news loopholes for Dems when republicans program the cards and the central tabulators. That's why getting rid of these monstrosities is imperative...we can't have black boxes running this country any longer. Paper ballots and open code are the ONLY way to go.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go get the bushbot, neocons and fundies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, you KNOW the Puggies don't believe in climate change.
Including political climate change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't think they have much belief in relaity either of late though
I mean, listen to them talk about morality and personal responsability...

then listen to them shift blame, attack their critics, defend torture and invading a soverign country and everything else they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAA! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now we have to be sure to defeat Alito. This weekend is crucial.
Send more faxes and e-mails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rule of law !
The republican criminals WILL be brought to justice for their crimes against the People.

How they howled "rule of law" when Clinton got a blowjob!

They will taste the rule of law when the People retake this Nation from the robber barons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerceptionManagement Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. The administration seems fearless in it's destruction of Democracy.
Anything to help these guys squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. yeah, they keep acting as if it's "business as usual"-how weird is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. OHHHHH YEAH!
I love it. If we can vote a Dem in in 2K8 (if they don't fix the election that is) then ol' Bushy doesn't have the comfort of a pardon on his side.

It gives me chills thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pretty amazing how most repukes will let their emperor...
get away with anything and everything.

Anything asshole does can be simply explained away and justified in their little minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Any sign of change in "political climate" = pardons for everyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not sure pre-prosecution pardons would withstand challenge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I think it does
I seem to recall Ford's pardons using the phrase, "have or may have committed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Still unsure whether it would survive a challenge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. They would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. nominate this (one of few articles in the press)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. be sure to thank the reporter--email address below.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/01/21/MNGNEGQPIR1.DTL&feed=rss.news

E-mail Edward Epstein at eepstein@sfchronicle.com.

San Francisco Chronicle
Future charges possible, Dems warn White House

Statute of limitations extends past 2008, congressman says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "the White House has begun a campaign to woo public opinion."


.....In preparation for that testimony, the White House has begun a campaign to woo public opinion.

On Wednesday, Bush will visit the top-secret National Security Agency headquarters at Ford Meade, Md., just outside Washington.

Gonzales is scheduled to give a speech about the program Tuesday. Deputy national intelligence director Mike Hayden, who headed the security agency when Bush started the program in October 2001, is scheduled to speak Monday at the National Press Club.

"We are stepping up our efforts to educate the American people," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "We are stepping up our efforts to educate the American people," Scott.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
64. I think he meant 'indoctrinate'.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL.
Oh, I'm sure having Gonzalez and Hayden speak on the subject will help.

More outrageous lies coming down the pike.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. I think this is like their last stand. "Come and get me, I'll be ready"
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 05:46 PM by wordpix2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes, and Rove & Co. are preparing the Rex84, Ops GardenPlot/Cablesplicer
detention camps for the 1/2 of the country that doesn't support der uber leader.

"The law is whatever Bush says it is" is their mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Riiiiight. Them and what army? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Dare to speak out and you get the Quaker treatment.
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 04:43 PM by EVDebs
As the man testified to in yesterday's testimony with Rep Conyers.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/camps.html

The proper authorities will suspend the Constitution, as Ollie North set out. BTW, Justice Roberts worked under the Reagan administration passing on the constitutionality of executive orders which Rex84 is based upon; Samuel Alito worked in the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel providing the same service to those who wished to extend presidential powers to imprison dissenters.

Enjoy.

BTW, read this from Oct 2004

Walter Cronkite Suspects Karl Rove is Behind Bin Laden Tape
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/008522.html

As with the current Chris Matthews smear campaign, the WhiteHouse is now out "...to equate opposition to George Bush with subversiveness, treason, and support for Al Qaeda."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
53. Should read
We are stepping up our efforts to lie to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yep. The statutue tolls until January 2009
By that time, Bush is going to be extremely unpopular- as are his various minions.

For once in his pathetic life, the man might actually be held accountable for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. I want to ask BushCorp why many US contractors in Iraq have KBR ties,
KBR being a Halliburton subsidiary. And many of the contracts can't be traced to anyone who is accountable for the contract.

Dickhead and Chimpy, do you care to comment on this lack of accountability re: US contractors in Iraq, the outsourcing of our armed forces to private companies who do not coordinate with US military, and the KBR connection re: contracts in Iraq?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. FINALLY, some are speaking truth to power
and its about damned time too. if they don't HAMMER them on this, this is gonna faaaade away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
57. Empty Threat
Otherwise, I doubt he'd be making it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. But then, suddenly, Rep. Nadler remembered that Bush will have
stacked the Supreme Court with judges that support his "Unitary Executive" authority to do whatever the fuck he wants, and said, "Oh... Never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. thank you, Rep. Nadler, another rep with balls!! Let them know they can't
get off so easily. They are forewarned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. Damn shame we have to wait for a political climate change to do
the right thing.

Those House Democrats are basically saying the "climate" now is so corrupt they can't do anything about the crimes of the President.

That some in Congress are so corrupt, so criminal - they refuse to do their job.

So we have to wait...

and to think there are people who are not bothered by that...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I see the Dems getting bolder. The key is stopping Scalito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Alito worked in Reagan WH and may have intimate knowledge of Rex84
Operations Garden Plot and Cable Splicer, all related to arresting and detaining dissenters under a 'suspension of the Constitution' !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. are these arrest/detain disenter ops current or under Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #44
54. The Executive Orders are current
Edited on Sun Jan-22-06 11:35 AM by EVDebs
""Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:


EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a "new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis." FEMA's powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate: the National Security Act of 1947, which allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities; the 1950 Defense Production Act, which gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy; the Act of August 29, 1916, which authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency; and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979."

from http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/fema.html

(scroll down and you'll see the list above as I've posted it) Please take the time to read up and futher investigate Rex 84, Operations Garden Plot and Cable Splicer, and the current SCOTUS nominees biographies as listed on the WhiteHouse.gov website, just google 'whitehouse.gov john roberts' for example and you see he was passing on these executive orders during his WH years; same with Samuel Alito during his DOJ Office of Legal Counsel to the WH days, passing on constitutionality issues.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. I think the Rex 84 thing was discredited, but I could be wrong on that
I'll see what I can find
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
66. Rex 84
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 06:26 PM by IanDB1
Rex 84
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a plan by the United States federal government to test their ability to detain large numbers of American citizens in case of massive civil unrest or national emergency. Exercises similar to Rex 84 happen periodically. From 1967 to 1971 the FBI kept a list of persons to be rounded up as subversive, dubbed the "ADEX" list. (Donner, Age p. 166.)

According to scholar Diana Reynolds:

The Rex-84 Alpha Explan (Readiness Exercise 1984, Exercise Plan), indicates that FEMA in association with 34 other federal civil departments and agencies conducted a civil readiness exercise during April 5-13, 1984. It was conducted in coordination and simultaneously with a Joint Chiefs exercise, Night Train 84, a worldwide military command post exercise (including Continental U.S. Forces or CONUS) based on multi-emergency scenarios operating both abroad and at home. In the combined exercise, Rex-84 Bravo, FEMA and DOD led the other federal agencies and departments, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Secret Service, the Treasury, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Veterans Administration through a gaming exercise to test military assistance in civil defense.

The exercise anticipated civil disturbances, major demonstrations and strikes that would affect continuity of government and/or resource mobilization. To fight subversive activities, there was authorization for the military to implement government ordered movements of civilian populations at state and regional levels, the arrest of certain unidentified segments of the population, and the imposition of martial rule. <1>

Existence of similar earlier exercises, "Garden Plot" and "Lantern Spike" were originally revealed by alternative journalist Ron Ridenhour, who summarized his findings in "Garden Plot and the New Action Army", (CounterSpy, 1975). Rex 84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987, and subsequently reported on by the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987. As news of the exercise spread, it was amplified by networks of people pursuing more elaborate conspiracy theories. <2>

More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

Okay... so:

1) Rex 84 is real
2) Rex 84 is bad

But, is Rex 84 as bad as AboveTopSecret says it is?

Inquiring minds want to know.

I'll see what else I can find.

Input from anyone else?


See also: The discussion of the article on Wikipedia.

The facts are bad enough. The feds regularly stage exercises to test their capacity to fulfill assigned tasks. The potential of a round up of targeted persons during a declared "national emergency" is a civil liberties nightmare, and we all should be aware of the potential. But these types of readiness exercises take place all the time. The fetish of Rex 84 is misplaced. What we can prove is happening now is bad enough. Conspiracism takes real problems and disempowers people trying to organize to confront them.--Cberlet 18:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rex_84
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Galatians 6:7 Be not deceived, God is not mocked...
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he
also reap" Galatians 6:7.

This pit of vipers has a rude awakening coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
60. From your lips to God's ears.
The republicans are sowing dark forces.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. We also need to address the whole presidential pardon issue if we ever get
Edited on Sat Jan-21-06 06:01 PM by SoCalDem
control back.. presidents should NOT be able to pardon anyone IN their own administration. I think it should not be allowed for anyone convicted within the past 5 years, which would preclude them pardoning one of their own.\

Pardons should stand on their own merit and should not be political "passes".

If a crooked politician screws up that bad, he/she should not walk just because their pal signs a piece of paper.. That is too "kingly"..

Goes for all "flavors" ..repubes or dems..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. wonder why * is visiting the NSA soon? I hope someone's got a wire on
snip:
Bush will visit the top-secret National Security Agency headquarters at Ford Meade, Md., just outside Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. In order to strike fear in any/all potential whistleblowers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. Way to go Nadler! Best news I've heard in awhile.
Maybe there IS a chance for justice after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. good for nadler!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-21-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. It is on record now.
Keep fucking up Repukes...you won't see office for 100 years after this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
52. Compared to the hell
the repugs put President Clinton through and all they got was an admission of fellatio. Bush on the other hand has in my opinion been given a free ride by the media and not brought about any true investigated reporting.

What I think the Dems should do is first.....Make sure they take control of at least one house of congress this fall. Two if possible. It is there for the taking and have got to put forth something the people can grasp on to and make them aware that by voting in a congress controlled by Democrats would be in their and the nations best interest.

What I do not want the Dems to do is start calling for impeachment. Whatever the message will be for folks to vote for a Democrat in their district or statewide for Senator will be lost and the message will be, all the dems want to do if they take control is impeach Bush....Keep the powder dry for now. Concentrate on winning the Congress back with a true Democratic message.....Impeachment and charges brought later is the best approach....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. Rigged '06 & '08 elections to keep Republicans in power?
Order up! If the GOP's smoke & mirrors brigade is looking for a compelling reason to repeat their contemptible election day and pre-election day tactics, they certainly have one now. Grabbing and retaining absolute power by any means at their disposal has always been motivation enough, but the potential for criminal prosecution if Democrats regain power? We ain't seen nothing yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. That's what I'm worried about, too, Zambero.
But the Dems still haven't figured out that the election machines are what's causing all the losses. I don't know what it would take to make the "get it".

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
62. Damn straight.
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Now THAT'S an opposition party - willing to talk about the punishment that fits this administration's many, many crimes.

One of which was the war. Let's not forget that, and prep some cells at the Hague!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
67. I would be really curious to know EXACTLY what the statute of limitations
is on this particular crime.

Seems like Nadler is giving up the ghost on prosecuting this before King George's term ends. I'm not sure how to take this statement. A little sad that Nadler feels it's possible these crimes will go unprosecuted until idiot is out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Staute of limitations for FISa violations should be well after 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Nice plank for the Democratic platform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC