Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Challengers target (Hillary) Clinton on Iraq issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 12:27 PM
Original message
Challengers target (Hillary) Clinton on Iraq issue

http://www.wnyt.com/x6244.xml?ag=x995&sb=x183

Challengers target Clinton on Iraq issue
War opponents seek nomination to U.S. Senate

By The Associated Press

Former Green Party member Steve Greenfield is formally announcing his candidacy for the Democratic Party's U.S. Senate nomination at an event today at Columbia University in New York City.

There's one big hurdle facing Greenfield. The seat is already held by a Democrat -- Hillary Rodham Clinton. And she's running for re-election.

Greenfield is an anti-Iraq war candidate who says the former first lady has been too supportive of the war.

Last week, another Democratic anti-war candidate announced his candidacy to unseat Clinton. Jonathan Tasini, a labor advocate and former president of the National Writers' Union, said Clinton's 2002 vote to authorize the war in Iraq proves she is out of step with New Yorkers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. She brought this on herself. She deserves the competition.
Uh, oh! Looks like Senator Hillary Clinton's recent gratuitious undermining of Congressman John Murtha brave speech on Iraq has resulted in a competitor now for her Senate seat.

Oops, Hillary, you went just a tad too far and now you may have cooked your own goose.

Anyone who takes this challenge lightly is foolish to do so.

Hillary brought this on herself.

Moreover, if the Democrats do not quickly organize a serious primary challenger to Joe Lieberman, they are inviting another credible Green challenger in Connecticut during the general election there, too.

Don't blame the Greens for this. Hillary and Bill just got a little too smart for their own good.

Hillary's undermining of John Murtha was reprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. These Two Combined, Sir
Will not get more than a sixth of the primary vote....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You are most likely correct.
I don't doubt that the good people of New York would turn a seat in the U.S. Senate to a Republican again after Al "Whitewater" Al D'Amato proved himself to be such a corporate whoring jerk.

Still, should Hillary keep up her latest antics, she could see more than 1/6th of the General Election vote going Green. The Green Party is growing every year and in the most liberal places in the country. Matt Gonzalez nearly won the Mayoral race in San Francisco against a very liberal Democrat.

Hillary's continued cozyiness up with George Bush's war policies in Iraq insults and infuriates a lot of great progressives in New York and beyond the Empire State.

John Murtha is correct about the War. Hillary is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "undermining of John Murtha" - what action by Hill gets this definition?
She said she was not signing on to his program as stated in his speech (Dean and Pelosi have signed on to Murtha's position). Indeed she said a decision on withdrawing from Iraq should be deferred until after national elections there next month -"I don't think realistically we know how prepared they are until we get a government on December 15," she is quoted as saying, in remarks to an audience in New York, by the Washington Post 11/22. "My approach is we tell them we expect you to meet these certain benchmarks and that means getting troops and police officers trained, equipped and ready to defend their people," Clinton said in widely-reported remarks.

She did nothing to advance the Murtha position - so this is undermining?

Only the right wing blogs and sites like NewsMax called her statements "undermining" -

Has some liberal site now come on board with the GOP and called her statement an "undermining"?

Has any site not dedicated to her not running for President called her statement "undermining"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Please. She threw a bucket of water on his fire when she didn't need to.
Are you actually insinutating that I'm a rightwinger?

Actually, I was being gracious. Her uncalled for statement right after Murtha's was far worse than undermining, it was treacherous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No I am not saying you are a rightwinger - of course not - but a different
opinion is not underminning - at least IMHO.

I grant you the bucket of water on his fire when she didn't need to - and I wish she had signed on as Dean and Pelosi have signed on - and I do not understand why she has not signed on.

But she is a contrast to our Illinois hero Rahm E who has undermined - or come damned close to doing so

and I was a cheerleader for him for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, then we agree.
And Rahm really made my jaw drop. I still am left dazed and confused by his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Oh yeah
the Dems blew a huge opportunity after the WAR HERO MUrtha stuck his neck out when no one else would. The usual hemming, hawing, and Smirk-enabling ensued. If every Dem in Congress had just jumped aboard the bandwagon, it would have had enough momentum to trample * on his next attempt at a dodge. If they'd all praised Murtha and fired on Smirk, Limpballs wouldn't have known where to point his next lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prog dude Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Best Hope for Victory (Right Now)
If you look at the electoral map, She has the best hope of tipping the scales, particularly if the Reps run a Northeasterner like Romney or Rudy.

She'll run from the center... that's all she's doing with all this.

Bill did the same thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Talk about DINO's!
There bozos have been Democrats for what, 20 minutes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great news for Hillary
With two of these guys in the race, she doesn't even have to get a majority fo the vote to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hillary getting the nomination is the problem that a worries alot of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But probably not enough NY Democratic voters
to cause her not to be reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oops! Sorry! I meant the Democatic nomination for President! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. All Right!!! An anti-war candidate!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh I'll bet Hillary is just shuddering in her boots!
Greenfelt will be mincemeat pie.

Next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prog dude Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. She'll Win
The nomination is hers to lose. Being moderate on national security doesn't make her a DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC