Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel (Saddam-Qaeda Link)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:42 PM
Original message
Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel (Saddam-Qaeda Link)
By Murray Waas, special to National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2005

Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter.

The information was provided to Bush on September 21, 2001 during the "President's Daily Brief," a 30- to 45-minute early-morning national security briefing. Information for PDBs has routinely been derived from electronic intercepts, human agents, and reports from foreign intelligence services, as well as more mundane sources such as news reports and public statements by foreign leaders.

One of the more intriguing things that Bush was told during the briefing was that the few credible reports of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda involved attempts by Saddam Hussein to monitor the terrorist group. Saddam viewed Al Qaeda as well as other theocratic radical Islamist organizations as a potential threat to his secular regime. At one point, analysts believed, Saddam considered infiltrating the ranks of Al Qaeda with Iraqi nationals or even Iraqi intelligence operatives to learn more about its inner workings, according to records and sources.

(...)

The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked the White House for the CIA assessment, the PDB of September 21, 2001, and dozens of other PDBs as part of the committee's ongoing investigation into whether the Bush administration misrepresented intelligence information in the run-up to war with Iraq. The Bush administration has refused to turn over these documents.

http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1122nj1.htm

(Bush lied, soldiers died -- IMPEACH!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. we need to have a special Democratic Oversight Committee specifically
for this misadministration. we need a coup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Conyers has tried (like with the dsm)--but as we see, nothing happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
63. I wouldn't say nothing happens.
It just doesn't happen as much as we would like or as fast as we would like. But I guess it's like turning a big ship- you gotta think way in advance. Things we do today may not show a reaction until 6 months from now.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
72. "Nothing happens"??? That and several other items that have been...
...made public over the last couple of years have gotten us to the current point in time where the NeoCons are in full retreat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennisnyc Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. We need to work our asses off to take back the House in '06!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. (whistling)
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just a microcosm, just the tip of the proverbial iceberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. More outrage! And yet as of yesterday
Cheney was still trying to tie Al Qaeda to Iraq. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Catapulting the propaganda
Doesn't matter if it's true, just that it's repeated over and over and over.

Many Americans have the reasoning skill of a turnip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
79. just one among many to have the clear....release order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakeguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. the truth is out there but bushco keeps lyin and the corporate media
and most americans just lap it up. it's like half of the country believes they only have one arm even though they can see both of them. "but the president on the tv SAYS i only have one arm so it must be true."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. But, but.....
it's irresponsible to say that the pResident deliberately misled us into war....BS....the reason he's hiding the info is because there's something to hide. The Dems better not let this go until the misadministration is FORCED to turn it all over. Repukes investigating repukes is the blind leading the blind into a ditch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. they actually had this on the screen on CNN today!
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 07:05 PM by leftchick
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Better than DSM IMHO. Smoking gun. LIAR LIAR LIAR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 04:57 AM
Original message
Dupe
Edited on Wed Nov-23-05 05:03 AM by Botany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
73. Just change the DSM to Sept 22 PDB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ok, Conyers! Light the candle of impeachment!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
83. I feel that flame coming.
I do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank god there wasn't a blow job though!
What would we tell the children? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Nope, just a complete screwing over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. This is so Checkmate
Game set match!

"Cheney continued to make the charge, even after he was briefed, according to government records and officials, that both the CIA and the FBI discounted the possibility of such a meeting. "

That's what we never had before. Records proving knowingly lying. They can't defend themselves with the "I just got bad intelligence" routine. No they got good intelligence and they chose to believe, and more importantly, said to the Nation what they wanted to be true.

Smoking Gun and I bet there's more where that came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I head this claim just today from a repug--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
74. good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kerry was right again wasn't he?
Why the hell wasn't that great man elected into office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is it! This is big!
Whoa!

Bush is a criminally psychopathic liar and manipulator. He's gotta go.. now.

Impeach the bastard.

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. has this hit the MSM yet? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. MSNBC mentioned it
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 06:47 PM by wookie294
for about 8 seconds.

Then they went back to discussing the hot Florida teacher having sex with a 14 year old student. (I'm not kidding.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. 8 seconds of enlightenment. whow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
85. This IS big.
Very very big. You can bet your ass that congress is going to see that PDB when they continue the "investigation" into pre-war intel.

This is gonna be good. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. It must have slipped his "mind"
Just like the Aug 8th PDB that slipped Condi's "mind" until she was reminded of the name of the briefing:
"Al-Queda determined to attack inside of USA"

Hmpf. Can't you people give the *ies a break ?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Someone will "inadvertantly" shred these documents....no doubt.
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 06:47 PM by BrklynLiberal
Is there a "Rose Mary Woods" anywhere on the Bush payroll these days?
Didn't they manage to shred all the documents from the FAA interviews right after 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Richard Clarke pretty much said this, too
If I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. I won't allow myself get excited...
Every single day I come across an article and say to myself, "This is it! This is gonna bring the Bush administration down!!" and then nothing happens. Besides tanking poll numbers, these bastards are getting away with all this shit and nothing is being done about it. I won't allow myself to get excited over this...although I do agree, this is HUGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Chris Mathews just mentioned this on Hardball...
Said he would talk about it later on the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
80. refusing to turn over the documents -- co-equal branches of govt????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Feith is mentioned.




.....Earlier this month, on November 14, the Pentagon's inspector general announced an investigation into whether Feith and others associated with the covert intelligence unit engaged in "unauthorized, unlawful, or inappropriate intelligence activities." In a statement, Feith said he is "confident" that investigators will conclude that his "office worked properly and in fact improved the intelligence product by asking good questions."

The Senate Intelligence Committee has also been conducting its own probe of the Pentagon unit. But as was first disclosed by The American Prospect in an article by reporter Laura Rozen, that probe had been hampered by a lack of cooperation from Feith and the Pentagon.

Internal Pentagon records show not only that the small Pentagon unit had the ear of the highest officials in the government, but also that Rumsfeld and others considered the unit as a virtual alternative to intelligence analyses provided by the CIA.

On July 22, 2002, as the run-up to war with Iraq was underway, one of the Naval Reserve officers detailed to the unit sent Feith an e-mail saying that he had just heard that then-Deputy Defense Secretary Wolfowitz wanted "the Iraqi intelligence cell … to prepare an intel briefing on Iraq and links to al-Qaida for the SecDef" and that he was not to tell anyone about it. .......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. The last paragraph says it all! Feith and OSP stovepiped intel to the WH
and bypassed the CIA vetting process so that the WHIG could get the "intel" they needed to justify an invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
54. Isn't this exactly what Sy Hersh wrote in The New Yorker a year ago?
Maybe more, maybe less than a year ago. Same terminology, too, "stovepiped."

No one on DU is surprised by this. No one. I think the only reason we're hearing more about it is because people now think it's "safe" to release this info because polls show that the U.S.S. bush-cheney is sinking into very deep, deep water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Was back in 2003. Yeah, that's where I got the term.
I linked to it on a page I'd put together before the election last year.

http://www.conjur.com/politics/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
59. Not Needed but WANTED. Cooked from Day One! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
60. Yeah the intel they got was wrong, because they 'manufactured' it
that way !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
75. here's hoping that Wolfowitz doesn't escape unscathed
He was as responsible as any for the carnage in Iraq.

That big Norway rat prolly thinks he jumped ship in the nick of time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. Spin this Cheney
You MF-in' POS!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. oh he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charles19 Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. All that "they saw the same intell we did" was pure LIES !!!!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. I can't believe this came out on the same day as the Al Jazeera
bombing convogate?! Unbelievable monsters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. kicked, recommended and forwarded to my entire email list.
Sam Seder is talking about this right now!! on AAR Majority Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. any discussion of this on the talk shows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. The chickens are roosting...
The current climate must have emboldened some of those people who have been afraid to speak up until now. Somebody's leaking like a rusty bucket of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
34. Wasse has been doing good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. Time for Cheney to give another "I am not a crook" speech n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. But "the dems looked at the same intelligence"
Isn't that what they keep saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. Keith's talking about it now!!
Oh, how I love him!:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. yes, he gave good overview of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. saying Sen. Intel Com. requested this PBD but WH has refused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. KO saying R.Clarke said the same thing-and O'Neil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Fineman saying that Repugs are getting tired of defending the Pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Fineman saying that this Iraqi debate is NOT going to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. back to Jean Smitht again--saying DeLay materialized out of nowhere
right after she said it and all repugs said she had to apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
58. Well, let them put his ass to the wall! Bush the GOP!
DAMN!

When will they wake the f*** up?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
57. John O'Neill. R.I.P.
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 09:22 PM by Roland99
:(


Or was that Paul O'Neill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. you rock, rodeodance
Thanks for the synopsis!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
52. There's an article about it on the MSNBC website - here's the link:
Hooray for Keith Olberman!!!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10164478 /
<snip>
Report: 9/11-Iraq link refuted days after attack
Magazine says administration refused to give key docs to Senate committee

MSNBC
Updated: 7:09 p.m. ET Nov. 22, 2005

Ten days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President Bush was advised that U.S. intelligence found no credible connection linking the attacks to the regime of Saddam Hussein, or evidence suggesting linkage between Saddam and the al-Qaida terrorist network, according to a published report.

The report, published Tuesday in The National Journal, cites government records, as well as present and former officials with knowledge of the issue. The information in the story, written by National Journal contributor Murray Waas, points to an abiding administration concern for secrecy that extended to keeping information from the Senate committee charged with investigating the matter.

In one of the Journal report's more compelling disclosures, Saddam is said to have viewed al-Qaida as a threat, rather than a potential ally.

“Indeed,” the Journal story reported, citing congressional sources, “the existence of the September 21 PDB was not disclosed to the Intelligence Committee until the summer of 2004.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maggie_May Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. Bush is so busted
this is it guys. We just need to keep up the pressure to finish phase 2 of the investigation into the intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. And once again, there you have it! That freak! IMPEACH HIM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. Bush never read PDBs anyway, we all know that from 9/11......
he'd have someone give him a synopsis of the information. Of course if that "someone" didn't mention those facts bush would never be intellectually curious enough to find out himself.

Of course Bush knew this all along anyway. He's had his Oedipal hard-on for Saddam since the first Gulf War. He was going to have Saddam's ass on a plate come hell or high water. This moron has never let facts get in the way of anything he's wanted to do. And just like everything else in his life, he's fucked it up beyond all recognition.

After 2008, when you look in Webster's American Dictionary under the word "loser", there will be a picture of George W. Bush.
Other words with his picture will be, "asshole", "liar", "failure" and "idiot".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
48. Goodness gracious!
What does it take for people to realize that this guy and his cronies, PNAC, fundies are all criminals hell-bent on destroying the US just for their own ego-driven agendas? Is this now impeacheable? What is it going to take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennisnyc Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. Waas interview on the Majority Report
www.majorityreportradio.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
53. K&R...ANOTHER nail in the coffin. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funnymanpants Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
55. Story obviously wrong
This story is obviously part of the liberal elite propaganda machine. It is more than 2 years after the war. We know what Bush told us before the war, that there were links between Iraq and Al Quaida. After he attacked, he certainly expected document after document to come out proving those links, thus leaving egg on the face of the anti war wrong.

Now the opposite has happened. Not only have no WMDs been found, but now, just when the good news should be coming out--the documents proving the links--the opposite is happening, proving there were no links.

So this obviously has to be wrong and part of the liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
61. The Bush administration has refused to turn over these documents.
To the Senate Intelligence Committee..

It's obvious the thieving sick-ass criminal republicans have lied like the dickins about this war.

May they burn in hell for destroying soo many families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
62. I thought M. Moore broke this story (to a degree) in F. 9/11. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
64. Although this comes as no real shock to us here,
The content of the document, if it's ever released, may indeed provide a legally binding, impeachable smoking gun.

This article gives a great overview of the whole nasty situation and the ususal suspects, and it's perfect for passing along to explain the whole convoluted thing to family and friends who don't sit on DU all day.

Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
65. Somebody with juice is leaking :)
Not even the Senate Intel committee has been able to get this.

snip>
Indeed, the existence of the September 21 PDB was not disclosed to the Intelligence Committee until the summer of 2004, according to congressional sources. Both Republicans and Democrats requested then that it be turned over. The administration has refused to provide it, even on a classified basis, and won't say anything more about it other than to acknowledge that it exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
66. Report: 9/11-Iraq link refuted days after attack (more proof Bush LIED)
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 08:24 PM by Wordie
Keith Olberman just ran a segment on this story...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10164478/
<snip>
Report: 9/11-Iraq link refuted days after attack
Magazine says administration refused to give key docs to Senate committee

MSNBC
Updated: 7:09 p.m. ET Nov. 22, 2005

Ten days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, President Bush was advised that U.S. intelligence found no credible connection linking the attacks to the regime of Saddam Hussein, or evidence suggesting linkage between Saddam and the al-Qaida terrorist network, according to a published report.

The report, published Tuesday in The National Journal, cites government records, as well as present and former officials with knowledge of the issue. The information in the story, written by National Journal contributor Murray Waas, points to an abiding administration concern for secrecy that extended to keeping information from the Senate committee charged with investigating the matter.

In one of the Journal report's more compelling disclosures, Saddam is said to have viewed al-Qaida as a threat, rather than a potential ally.

“Indeed,” the Journal story reported, citing congressional sources, “the existence of the September 21 PDB was not disclosed to the Intelligence Committee until the summer of 2004.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Well yes, Saddam was a secular Muslum. Osama doesn't want
Uncle Saddy in his business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #67
68.  Saddam and Osama just weren't interested in the same things.
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 08:29 PM by Wordie
Osama wants to establish a huge theocracy in the ME, with sharia law. The LAST thing Saddam wanted was to encourage Islamic fundamentalism, which would have been a threat to his power. So, why on earth would anyone suppose they would become allies?

Even I, with my relatively limited knowledge of the ME could figure that out. Why couldn't the Bush admin??? Jeez.

I'm happy this is all coming to light now, though. This is a potentially really BIG story. If it is accurate, Bush looks even MORE incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Oil got in their eyes..... sorta clouded their vision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. Now if the ostriches would just see
the light. Bush & Buddies should be made to fess' up to using this lie without refuting it instead of using it as one of their prime pieces of propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. This thread should be locked; it is a dupe. Here is link to earlier thread
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 08:38 PM by Wordie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #70
76. NO IT SHOULDN'T ..MANY DIDN'T AND WON'T SEE THE OTHER
thread ..this thread has many posters and needs to stay open!

thanks mods, and please keep this thread open...
fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. My apologies. I was referring to my own thread that has now been
incorporated into this one. This thread surely SHOULD remain open. Sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
78. 11/21/01 PDB +PNAC= Conspiracy to carry out unjustified war
Edited on Wed Nov-23-05 10:17 AM by melissinha
Now this is the final piece we have the means in which the WHIG with their years of planning of the PNAC which allowed them to carry out their evil plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveColorado Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
81. CHIMPEACH!!!
We've got those bastards now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
82. Gee more proof that the intelligence was NOT bad.
Huh, imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
84. bushco again thwarts an investigating comm like it did w/ 9-11 commission
These criminals should be brought up on obstruction of justice charges.


"The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked the White House for the CIA assessment, the PDB of September 21, 2001, and dozens of other PDBs as part of the committee's ongoing investigation into whether the Bush administration misrepresented intelligence information in the run-up to war with Iraq. The Bush administration has refused to turn over these documents."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC